从组织到行动：行政改革的社会建构转向

行政改革是提振公共行政公共性的关键举措。改革开放以来,得益于以机构改革为牵引的行政改革持续推行,行政组织的功能和公共行政的有效性都得到了显著增强,有力夯实了公共行政的公共性。然而,随着改革的深入,机构改革逐渐显露与发展时空脱节和主体缺场的缺陷,而且面临改革边际收益下降和成本攀升的困境。因此,行政改革本身也亟需一场深刻变革。在工业社会转向数字社会的复杂场景中,公共行政的社会建构主义主张以社会场景和社会关系找回时空性和主体性,进而将行政改革的焦点从组织本身的优化转向合作行动的建构。社会建构主义视阈下的行政改革,力求将公共行政思维从回应性转向前瞻性,将目标从协作性转向合作性,将方法从自在性转向他在性,以公共行政的社会性确保公共行政公共性的持续高企。未来的行政改革,当根植数字时代,促进政府与社会之间的关系从单向调适到多维互构共变的历史性跨越,搭建多元主体合作行动的基本框架。     

我国刑事附带民事诉讼制度的反思与重构

我国由于司法理念偏差导致的刑事附带民事诉讼制度的缺陷使这项制度并没有发挥应有的作用,没有实现立法目的。本文从立法理念出发,对我国现行刑事附带民事诉讼制度进行反思,通过借鉴别国先进的立法技术,以期对现行制度的改革找到出路,逐渐由现行的附带式向平行式转变,以便更有利地打击犯罪和保护刑事被害人的利益。     

Intermediate Performance Impacts of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Systems: An Empirical Investigation*

A large-scale random sample is used to empirically examine the relationships between implementation of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (AMT) and three organization-level measures that have historically been attributed to AMT, but not fully tested along the AMT spectrum: market-oriented flexibility of the production process, organizational integration of production processes, and administrative intensity of the organization. Results indicate that as an organization moves along the technology scale from stand-alone AMT (e.g., CNC machines) through functionally oriented AMT (FMS and CAM) toward CIM, not only do its production processes become more integrated with each other, but those processes become more integrated with other functional systems of the organization, and the quality and timeliness of production information increase. Furthermore, this relationship becomes stronger as companies increase their level of implementation for the latter two technologies. Conversely, market-oriented flexibility decreases and administrative intensity is not observed to change as companies move along the technology spectrum. Future research should examine how organizational redesign and implementation strategies that accompany AMT implementation can concomitantly enhance organizational integration of the production process and market-oriented flexibility.     

论约翰·塞尔的“是-应当”推导

回顾了对约翰·塞尔的"是-应当"推导的有关批评,以及塞尔对这些批评的回应和对他的理论的发展.在此基础上,借助于对行为的概念分析,试图论证,塞尔在他的推导中,混淆了做出某种行为和某种行为获得成功之间的区分;由此,未能正确地解释制度与制度性事实的关联方式,以至于认为制度性事实的存在可以否定"是-应当"区分.