关于贫困文化的思考

贫困文化是与贫困经济相互对应的一个范畴,贫困文化反映了贫困经济的精神实质;贫困经济则从根本上决定了贫困文化的物质表现形式。贫困文化是造成贫困经济的一个重要精神原因,改变贫困经济的状况,必须首先改造贫困文化的价值形态。     

Unmanaging public relations: Reclaiming complex practice in pursuit of global consent

Globalisation raises numerous problems for contemporary public relations theory. In a world where the geographic reach of organisations routinely spans cultures and nation states and where issues of culture, economics and politics are inseparably intertwined, the discipline of public relations has established a distance from the immediacy of the marketplace, failed to fully engage with discussions of culture. By taking a relentlessly managerialist approach, theorists have also failed to recognise the true complexity of public relations practice and this has marginalised aspects of practice that, though nebulous and intangible, are none the less real. This paper argues that attention needs to shift towards the complexities of practice, in order to recapture and theorise a distinctive occupational field with the aim of better understanding the relationship between universal humanising principles, on the one hand, and the purposive demands of capital, on the other; the attempt to theorise how public relations makes profitable sense in society. The paper was prompted by the author's reflections on auto-ethnographic research into the public relations field, part of an ongoing research project.     

Interfamily economic exchange: A function of culture or economics?

This study explores differences in inter-household exchange of goods and services in Anglo- and Mexican-American families controlling for income level and for ethnicity. The extent of such exchange, its perceived importance to the family's quality of life, satisfaction with the exchange, and the relation of persons in the exchange process are examined. Significant differences are found more often between higher income Anglo- and Mexican-Americans than between low-income families, both in the family providing goods and services for others and in the receipt of them. Higher income Mexican-American families are more likely than their Anglo- counterparts to exchange with relatives. Ethnic effects are more prevalent in higher income households than in low-income households. Economic effects are more predominant than ethnic effects.This study contributes to interregional Agricultural Experiment Station Research Project NC-128, Quality of Life as Influenced by Area of Residence. Cooperating states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio, Texas.Flora L. Williams' current research interests include income adequacy, financial problems, and indicators of change in economic well-being. She is an Associate Professor, Consumer Sciences and Retailing, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.     

启蒙者的非启蒙心态——五四新文化运动的历史性局限

新文化运动的最大不足在于启蒙不够充分.由于历史性的诸多原因,新文化提倡者带有浓厚的科举心态,缺乏对文化启蒙及其功能的深刻理解,将启蒙当做一种政治手段,让启蒙承担起其力不能及的过分沉重的民族国家的现代性使命.这种非启蒙心态在启蒙内部构成了一种颠覆,使启蒙丧失了其本身所具有的基本价值及功能.     

五四新文化运动与欧洲文艺复兴运动比较

五四新文化运动与欧洲文艺复兴运动生成于不同时期,植根于不同土壤,二者既有一些共同之处,又有不少差异。对其进行比较,有助于加深我们对两个运动各自特性的认识。其共同点是：（一）对传统的批判与重建;（二）倡导文学革命;（三）抨击封建权威思想;（四）呼唤人性的复苏,倡导个人的解放。其不同点是：（一）背景不同;（二）影响力不同;（三）带来的后果不同。     

大众文化背景下大学生影视审美娱乐化探析

大众文化迅猛发展的背景下,大学生的影视审美呈现出娱乐化倾向。这一倾向的出现,主要是源于大众文化的强势渗透、影视文化的直观感性诱惑和大学生的紧张心理释放需求。影视审美娱乐化对大学生的思想观念、社会化进程及心理产生了双重影响。因此,要大力营造健康向上的文化氛围,引导和促进大学生影视审美健康发展。     

双语教育与新疆各族群间的文化协同

文章结合新疆双语格局、双语教育和双语教学现状,阐明多民族社会语言协同和文化协同的重要性,提出双语教育能够从促进少数民族文化水平与素质提高,传统文化挖掘、继承与发展,教育事业发展,劳动就业,专业技术人员的培养,科学素质的提高等方面推动文化协同;从社会长治久安角度,指出文化协同在多民族社会共同基本价值观的形成、对于异族群文化所应秉持的态度、跨民族语言交际与民族团结、超族群文化对新疆文化的发展等方面的重要意义。     

全球化营销过程的跨文化分析

全球化已是经济发展的一种趋势 ,如何在全球市场上争得一席之地是企业正在面对和极需解决的问题 ,对全球化营销过程的跨文化分析就是为解决这一复杂的系统问题尽一点力。在全球化的市场中 ,文化的差异是普遍存在的。怎样利用好这些文化差异以有利于企业在海外拓展市场是全球化营销的关键 ,其解决的方法就是认识文化差异和理解文化差异 ;同时也为加入了WTO的中国企业提供了一条走出去的思路。     

先验主义:美国十九世纪的语文经验

本文探讨了19世纪先验主义思潮在美国民族文化独立运动中所起到的作用和贡献。通过对这个时期的语文经验讨论和研究,作者认为美利坚民族利用先验主义的思潮进一步推动了美利坚民族走向文化独立的步伐,从而使这个民族具有了不同于其它民族的识别特征。     

论“文革”对鲁迅的研究

文革时期对鲁迅的研究,与文革特性高度一致,一切从政治需要出发,远离对象本体,为我所用、削足适履,在研究内容上将鲁迅设计为"角斗士";在研究路径和研究队伍上呈现为一种非常态,完全抛弃学术立场、学理原则,丧失了文学研究的独立品格和主体精神.