赛义德的《东方主义》为什么没有涉及远东

本文从赛义德的出身背景、研究方法和东方历史三个方面论述了为什么赛义德的《东方主义》没有涉及远东:一、限于阿拉伯出身背景和知识学力,深受中东中心主义或伊斯兰中心主义影响,赛义德突出近东、中东,忽略远东,将远东置于东方的边缘地带;二、赛义德东方主义的研究方法不适于东亚地区(特别是中国)的东方主义研究;三、西方殖民势力没有在远东(主要是中国)取得长期、绝对的殖民统治。故此,远东不具备东方主义发生的必要条件。     

批评家的“现世性”——解读赛义德

赛义德,已故美国哥伦比亚大学比较文学教授,世界闻名的文学、文化理论家和批评家,有着复杂而矛盾的特殊身份,其批评议题广泛,其中批评家的“现世性”强调批评家工作的定位以及批评家的作用,其特殊身份对该议题的选择有着深刻的影响.本文将在分析其身份的基础上解读其批评家的“现世性”这一议题。     

从东方学看电影《贫民窟的百万富翁》中的后殖民主义

认为电影《贫民窟的百万富翁》中关于印度的描写并非是真实的,而是西方国家在后殖民时代对东方文化的一种歪曲和控制,其目的是为了满足西方观众的猎奇心理,迎合西方东方主义者的欣赏品味,体现了殖民时期之后宗主国与殖民地之间不平等的文化话语权力关系。对新时期我国如何定位本土文化提出建议。     

一部将“死城”复活的小说——爱德华·鲍沃尔·李敦《庞贝城的末日》

英国作家爱德华·鲍沃尔·李敦的历史传奇小说《庞贝城的末日》，描绘了罗马鼎盛时期的庞贝城，通过城市物质空间及在这一空间中活动着的高贵的和卑贱的生命的故事，复活了一座埋葬了1700多年的古城，向现代人展现了这座城市的风俗习惯、宗教文化以及它所遭遇的一场巨大而可怕的灾难。     

从会话合作原则执行情况看《沙箱》的主题建构

从语用学角度切人,运用格莱斯的会话含义理论探讨美国荒诞派剧作家爱德华·阿尔比短剧《沙箱》的主题建构。通过分析主要角色对数量准则、质量准则、关联准则、方式准则的执行情况,认为剧中人对合作原则的遵守或违反所生成的特殊会话含义表达了现代社会家庭机能失调、亲情缺失、人性冷漠、人与人无法沟通、生不如死等主题。     

《太极图说解》的理学思想述略——兼论朱熹与周敦颐的思想渊源

朱熹推尊周敦颐《太极图说》,以理学立场对《太极图说》进行了诠释与发挥,并作有《太极图说解》一书。朱熹《太极图说解》明确把《太极图说》纳入理学思想体系,宗奉二程,以＂理＂、＂气＂释太极,辟佛、道归儒,勾勒出天道性命贯通为一的学说,由此推阐出理学体系的基本框架。     

赛义德与葛兰西文化革命思想之比较

赛义德和葛兰西都主张在文化领域发动一场非暴力性的软权力革命。葛兰西站在现代性的立场上对资产阶级的文化霸权进行了批判,鼓动无产阶级从资产阶级手中把文化领导权夺过来。赛义德从后现代性的立场出发,对西方文化中的霸权进行了揭露,主张把西方的文化领导权给彻底消解掉。     

The engineering of consent: A state-of-the-art review

This study systematically analyzes Engineering of Consent (EOC)-focused scholarly papers published between 1947 and 2018 using content analysis and text mining. It aims to shed light on the progress of EOC research and related disciplines as well as the methodologies, data collection methods, major perspectives, and most frequent words used within these writings. Additionally, this study considers publications by region and the affiliations of first authors. The results show that only a small number of EOC-focused papers have been published since 1947; this area of public relations research has suffered from a lack of scholarly attention despite its relevance to various disciplines, and this is a situation that we hope improves. Recent trends have shown some reasons for optimism. We found that at least one EOC-focused paper has been published annually in most years since 2000 (the exceptions are 2001, 2006, 2010, 2011, and 2015). Our research shows that scholars in the fields of public relations, media studies, and political science published more papers on EOC than scholars in other fields. Research articles usually utilize qualitative research methodologies. Interviews stand out as the most widely used data collection method. Our analysis of publications by region and first-author affiliation shows that the majority of EOC papers were written by faculty and students working or studying in the United States. Seven perspectives frequently discussed by scholars and the most frequently used words within EOC papers are highlighted in a follow-up qualitative review.