《搜神记》中的韵文研究

六朝志怪小说的代表作《搜神记》在写作上采用了韵散相间的叙述方式,其中的韵文可分为:谣谚;预言、卜辞和隐语;诗歌。分言之,谣谚的征引使小说既保留了民间传说固有的风调,又使作品的思想得以升华;预言、卜辞和隐语的使用,来源于国人原始信仰的积淀,在小说中作为推动故事发展的关键,反映了其时的社会文化心理;作品中还有一些赋诗、引诗的情况,这种承自上古文学传统的表达方式,提高了小说的文体地位,增强了小说的鉴赏性。概言之,韵散相间的写作方式具有深刻的文体意义,为后世小说的创作提供了借鉴。     

王阳明与冀元亨

介绍了王阳明与冀元亨结识的情况,并从思想史角度考察了王阳明、冀元亨和朱宸濠之间的交往,突出研讨了王阳明历史研究方面问题的重要性。通过本文的研究,我们可以得出下列结论:(1)冀元亨是最早将阳明心学运用到科举考试之中;(2)冀元亨实践了阳明良知之学;(3)阳明心学源于政治上的黑暗。     

王渔洋的《题辞》与余秋室的佳《序》——谈《聊斋志异》的“独创性原则”

渔洋老人为《聊斋志异》的《题词》,揭示了作品的"总体特征"。百年之后,余秋室之佳《序》,有如《题词》之注脚,全面而深刻的阐释、发挥了《题词》的思想,指出了《聊斋志异》何以"厌作人间语"爱听鬼唱时"。而这一点,作为《聊斋志异》的思想与艺术的"总体特征",正体现着文学的"独创性原则"。     

嵇康《声无哀乐论》的主体意识

嵇康《声无哀乐论》不但是音乐的,而且是哲学的,隐含了嵇康对生命哲学中人的主体性的觉醒与价值认同,代表了魏晋士人探索主体性价值的成就。其中所展现的生命意识和主体性认识的新的理论趣味,既奠定了嵇康音乐新解的历史价值,也建构起他所主张的个性自由和逍遥的理想"音乐"人格。     

唐代御史厅壁记写作的文学与文献学价值——以李华､柳宗元厅壁记写作为例

“厅壁记”是镌刻在古代衙门的墙壁上,记述历代职官沿革、制度得失、官员迁转等,具有警示教育意义的一种文体.唐代御史的厅壁记写作重视“法”的作用,有些甚至上升为国家意志,与粉饰太平的馆阁文学大不相同,是中国法制史上浓墨重彩的一笔.唐代御史的厅壁记写作有着独特的文学价值:(1)李华、柳宗元的诸多厅壁记均用散体文写就,简洁真切,议论精警,已开中唐古文运动的先声.(2)唐代御史在厅壁记创作中注入鲜明的主体意识,语言辛辣,发人深思.唐代御史厅壁记的文献学价值表现在:一是订补现存史志文献之阙,促进唐史研究的深入;二是有助于对唐代文学发生背景的了解.唐代御史厅壁记因观览人数较多,其公众宣传、社会传播、舆论导向之作用亦不可忽视.     

二十卷本《搜神记》的语料价值

作为“采访近世之事”的著作,《搜神记》（二十卷本）中有很多接近当时口语的成分,保存了晋代当时很多的常用语汇,为后世研究魏晋词汇面貌提供了材料;书中大量的新词新义,既可补充现有辞书的不足,又反映出这一时期汉语词汇的真实面貌。这些都说明《搜神记》在中古汉语词汇研究中具有很大的语料价值,我们在研究汉语词汇尤其是中古汉语词汇时应予以足够重视。     

一个多民族文学融合互动的范本——《述善集》文学文献价值考述

“Tangwu” is an alternative name for the descendants of the Xixia dynasty. In 1227 AD, a number of these Xixia descendants moved inland after the destruction of the Xixia Dynasty by the Mongolians. One group of them migrated to the area near Puyang, Henan Province. Tangwu Chongxi ( Yang Chongxi ) of the Yuan Dynasty compiled the Shu San Ji, which is divided into three volumes: Shansu, Yucai and Xingshi, and appended with the biography of Boyan Zongdao. It reflects the historical origins, social class, living conditions and the relations with the Han people of the descendants of the Dangxiangqiang minority af-ter they moved to Puyang. This book attracted a lot of attention in academic circles, and it was there-fore reorganized and published in 1985 after being treasured by the people for more than 600 years. It has high academic value for its comprehensive his-torical records. We can not only acquaint ourselves with the history of the make-up of the Chinese na-tion, but also research this diversity from multiple perspectives, such as history, nationality and folk-lore . That is why it has drawn so much attention a-mong academic researchers. The book contains po-ems, prose and biographies, which belong to dif-ferent celebrated scholars from different ethnic mi-norities, all of whom had relationships with Tang-wu Chongxi. It is also a typical model of Qiang-Han literature, which is very rare. This paper gives a preliminary exploration on the book, and shows a small part of its comprehensive value. Shu San Ji is not a merely personal collec-tion, but is also different from general literature collections. The compilation of the book took a long time. Shu San Ji Xuxie ( Continuation of Shu San Ji) , written by Zhang Yining, was finished in the 18 th year of the Zhizheng Period in the Yuan Dynasty (1358), which indicates that the Shu San Ji had already been finished by that time . Zeng wuwei chushi yangxiangxian xu ( Presented to Chu Shi Yang Xingxian·Preface ) , written by Wei Su and finished in the 24 th year of Zhizheng ( 1364 ) , suggests that the Shu San Ji had been compiled in-to a book by that time, and that it was compiled with the compositions of social celebrities of the time. However, the Shu San Ji, as it has been handed down to us today, includes the Song Yang-gong Xiangxian gui Tanyuan xu ( Preface of Send-ing Yanggong Xiangxian Back to Tanyuan) by Tao Kai, written in March in the 5 th year of Hongwu in the Ming Dynasty ( 1372 ) . It indicates that Yang Xiangxian kept on collecting articles even after the book was finished. The Xu yangshi yiji ( Preface of Yang’s Last Collection) by Wang Chongqing, writ-ten in the 6th year of Jiajing (1527), indicates that the Shu San Ji was still being written after Yang Chongxi’s death. At the end of the Shu San Ji , Boyang Zongdao zhuan ( Biography of Boyang Zongdao) and Weiti shi (Poems) were collected in the 16 th year of Zhengde in the Ming Dynasty (1529) and in the 16th year of Shunzhi in the Qing Dynasty (1629), respectively. It suggests that the
Shu San Ji had been supplemented and continually recompiled since Yang Chongxi firstly finished his book in 1358. After 271 years, in 1629, the Shu San Ji, as we read it today, was finally comple-ted. Through the basic components of the Shu San Ji,readers can understand that the Tangwu family was a harmonious, multi-ethnic family. A number of multi-ethnic writers spent long periods compos-ing works collected in the Shu San Ji and Tangwu Chongxi was also influenced by China’s diverse culture and traditional Confucian culture. The work is strongly connected with his study in Guozixue. In the late Yuan Dynasty, the restora-tion of the imperial examinations promoted Confucianism’s influence further. Pan Di, as Tang-wu Chongxi’s teacher in Guozixue, wrote most arti-cles in the Shu San Ji, which shows their close re-lationship and his influences on Tangwu Chongxi’s literature and Confucian studies. Tangwu Chongxi and others’ works reflected their sense of admira-tion for and deep feelings for their Dangxiang an-cestors, but more so helped to propagate the con-cepts of Confucian edification, diligence, thrifti-ness and benevolence, and some of them did so in a very polemic way. For example, Boyan Zongdao wrote the Jiefu xu ( preface of “Jiefu”) and Tang-wu Chongxi wrote the Jiefu houxu ( epilogue of“Jiefu”) , which reflect the social reality and ide-ology of all scholars with different ethnic back-grounds at that time. His work, “Tangwu gong-bei” fushi ( Poem inscribed on Tangwu Tablet ) , was written in a plain and authentic way and showed that he always remembered his origins and his ethnic desire to inherit the family’s heritage. Meanwhile , it was also mixed with the popular ide-as of upholding the honor of their ancestors from the central plains and Han areas, which shows the
editorial purpose of the Shu San Ji and also dem-onstrates the value of Chinese multi-ethnic litera-ture and cultural integration.     

周代籍礼“风土”考

《国语》所载周代"籍礼",是一种具有巫术特征的礼仪活动。其意义是疏导土壤中的阳气,使之顺利地播散。籍礼中,以瞽为首的乐官们所从事的"风土"活动,并不是韦昭注所以为的观察土壤中的气脉,而是通过乐舞鼓动风气,帮助土壤中的气脉顺利播散。它是这一土壤巫术中的重要组成部分。     

“无厚入有间”与“有厚入无间”辨——周济和蒋敦复词学思想比较研究

“无厚入有间”和“有厚入无间”分别为清代词学家周济和蒋敦复的论词之语，这种形象化的说法颇难领会。结合两家的其他词论，对二者的实质意义进行阐释，并揭示二者的区别。     

明代兼主唐宋派的韩愈古文与《史记》之比较批评

韩愈古文与《史记》之比较批评是韩文批评史中一个重要内容。早期关注点较分散,涉文气、文质、天才与穷而后工等议题,具体论较以文体、句法为主。明中期,兼主唐宋派针对独尊秦汉文法式,袭貌遗神之时弊,开始形成以《史记》为衡量,强调"神髓"、"本色"的比较自觉。这是接续古文统绪之举,是由唐宋以溯秦汉思潮的产物。既为其重要研究方法,所形成的侧重文统和师法的比较理论,又构成其古文理论的核心内容。