关于“哲学无定论”问题的探讨与陈修斋先生的阐释

哲学无定论是20世纪中国哲学家明确提出并反复探讨的一个重要哲学问题,其实质是立足于现代哲学对哲学本性所做的一种探讨。这个问题在20世纪中国哲学中被鲜明地提出并得到热烈地讨论,是人文主义与科学主义两大思潮环绕哲学与科学关系问题相激互融的结果。严复、王国维、张君劢、丁文江、熊十力、贺麟在20世纪上半叶对这个问题予以了逐渐深入的探讨。陈修斋于1988年发表的《关于哲学本性问题的思考》一文,从元哲学的高度,并结合马克思主义哲学,对这一问题予以了新的阐释,使这一问题在中国马克思主义哲学中鲜明地凸显出来。     

Inside the blogosphere: A taxonomy and framing analysis of abortion weblogs

This study analyses weblog abortion-related content sampled via a search and snowball method. When weblogs located inside of established media Web sites and other weblogs are compared, they are equivalent in the use of advocacy versus objectivist frames. Media weblog posts contain a political frame more frequently than non-media weblog posts do. In terms of diversity of frame, media weblogs employ more frames in their stories. Various explanations for these findings are offered in the context of current abortion-related content patterns.     

从"视域"到"共呈"

论述了从作为胡塞尔“第一哲学”最重要的概念的“视域”概念向作为胡塞尔“第二哲学”最重要的概念的“共呈”概念的理论过渡,以及这一过渡在胡塞尔哲学中的重要的意义,认为它标志着胡塞尔现象学中的主体性理论与主体间性理论的真正的统一,并且宣告了作为所谓的现代哲学的“哥白尼式的革命”的最高产物的一种“先验现象学’学说的最终的确立。     

理性的两难及出路

理性是哲学的最大特点,理性不断推动自己,外向地形成哲学的文化系统,内向则不断追问自己的合理性。现代西方哲学,尤其实证主义,虽然有其肯定经验和客观性的合理的一面,但从哲学之为人学的角度讲,这远远不够,忽视了人是作为道德与价值主体的存在。中国哲学的核心是"道",理性是"道"作为规律系统的应有之义。中国哲学强调理性与德性统一,理性为德性的基础并最终被德性所统摄,而这就是理性的出路。     

关于目前哲学形状的反思

哲学已经陷入了困境,这是从事哲学教学与研究的人必须要面对的现实。出现这种情况的根源简单的可以概括为：一是哲学缺少反思,批判性差,处于失职状态：二是充满假大空,粉饰太平,没有实现求真知,捍卫真理的历史使命：三是体系单一,内容陈旧,不能适应改革发展的需要;四是表述混乱,故弄玄虚,玩文字游戏,离现实越来越远。     

论马克思主义哲学基本问题的现代转向

哲学的突出特点,在于其基本问题的不断转向,即不断地自我否定、自我超越和自我创造.古代本体论哲学的基本问题是存在为何物的问题,近代认识论哲学的基本问题是思维把握存在的客观性问题,马克思主义哲学的基本问题是思维把握存在的方法论问题.哲学基本问题的现代转向,必须立足于实践,重视人与自然的和谐发展.     

人的自由而全面发展的思想宝库──马克思《1857─1858年经济学手稿》研究(总论)

人的自由而全面发展不但是马克思哲学所揭示的深刻的历史规律 ,也是马克思哲学的最高的价值理想。在《185 7─ 185 8年经济学手稿》中 ,马克思以人的自由而全面发展为主题 ,深入地论述了九个哲学观点 :社会发展的三形态说 ;资本对发展生产力、扩大交往范围、增加自由时间的伟大文明作用 ;劳动性质的演变 ;自由时间的意义 ;财富尺度的演变 ;科学是生产力 ;人既是目的又是手段 ;人的社会性质分析 ;人的需要的两种形式。     

网络媒体有资格吗？——“网络媒体”与三大传统媒体资质辨析

互联网出现以后 ,被许多人称为“网络媒体”或“第四媒体” ,并认为它将威胁三大传统媒体的生存 ,或与三大传统媒体长期竞争 ,共存共荣。本文认为 ,所谓的“网络媒体”目前尚没有发展成为与三大传统媒体相抗衡的强有力的大众传播媒体 ,尚不具备与三大传统媒体相互竞争的资质 ,并从“网络媒体”目前的普及水平、社会影响力、功能与角色及其存在的缺陷等方面对此进行了分析和说明     

Media use in long-distance friendships

New media such as email and mobile phones have made it easier to maintain relationships over distances. The present paper examines which media people use to maintain long-distance friendships. The main focus lies on the comparison of email and phone. Media choice theories like media richness theory assume that media can be classified according to their richness, and that people choose the medium which fits best to the affordances of a specific task. The phone as richer medium should be preferred over email in the case of maintenance of long-distance friendships because it is easier to express emotions and to give immediate feedback via phone than via email. Email is an asynchronous medium and communication via email is therefore independent of space and time. Therefore, it can also be argued that email is preferred over the phone because it makes it easier to communicate across different work schedules or even time-zones. In two studies (Study 1 conducted in the Netherlands, Study 2 conducted in Germany) media use in long-distance friendships was measured. Across both studies, email was the most frequently used medium. In Study 1, an interesting asymmetric influence of closeness of the friendship emerged. The closer the friendship, the more emails were written in total, but the less the relative use of email. Instead, the percentage of phone calls increased. Study 2 aimed to replicate and explain this finding and assessed also the content of the phone call or emails. Whereas the intimateness of the emails did not change with increased closeness of the friendship, the intimateness of the phone calls increased with increasing closeness of the friendship. This result indicates that people use email primarily for staying in touch, whereas important personal matters are still discussed on the phone.     

THE FUTURE OF PUBLIC MEDIA CULTURES

This paper seeks to tie in the arguments that can be connected to the development of a global media culture and concerns around cosmopolitan forms of democracy. This is done by considering arguments for: (i) a global human right initiative in respect of global media conglomerates; (ii) technological change in respect of digital cultures; and (iii) the arrival of what Castells'shas described as the culture of 'real virtuality'. These views and perspectives are assessed in terms of the contributions they are likely to make towards what I call a 'cautious cosmopolitanism'. Finally I seek to make some definite policy recommendations that might help foster conditions in which cosmopolitan democracy could flourish.