人文奥运遗产与“人文北京”建设

北京奥运会所产生的人文奥运遗产,主要表现在奥运教育、体育健身、志愿精神、文明礼仪、形象标识、民族精神等方面.在北京由中等发达城市向发达城市迈进的新发展阶段中,努力继承人文奥运遗产,加强体育文化建设,发展体育产业,促进中外体育交流,继续开展奥林匹克教育,推动"人文北京"建设,对打造北京国际体育中心城市,把北京建设成为亚太地区乃至全球最有影响力的国际化城市,并促使中国由体育大国转为体育强国,具有重要意义.     

培智学校“特奥引领计划”体育育人体系构建

以某培智学校为例,旨在探索体育育人体系构建路径。“特奥引领计划”体育育人体系强调“重在参与”“包容融合”“激励成长”“综合素质”,以特殊奥林匹克运动为依托,将以体育人、以体益智、以体育德、以体健美以及以体促劳作为核心目标,构建“特奥引领计划”体育育人体系,包括“三三三”教学模式、四梯队育人团队、赋权增能评价方式和融合指向的育人机制。     

Constructing a city,building a life: Brazilian construction workers’ continuous mobility as a permanent life strategy

This article provides an ethnographic analysis of domestic labor mobility among Brazilian construction workers in the context of the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro. We start from the premise that mobile laborers are crucial for the physical development and expansion of cities. However, the importance of domestic migrants in this process is insufficiently addressed in mobility studies. Building on existing research on domestic population movements in Brazil, we argue that the current generation of mobile construction workers draws on the intangible and material infrastructure generated by previous generations of migrants to enable novel kinds of (permanent) labor mobilities.     

市场经济与2008年奥运会

本文分析了在举办2 0 0 8年奥运会过程中,政府应在其中发挥的作用。奥运会的举办,应有利于推动北京乃至中国市场化进程和市场经济体制的成熟,政府应是只承担相应责任的政府。文章还对一些有关奥运会的热点问题如节俭办奥运与办一届出色奥运会等,进行了探讨。     

机遇与挑战——2008年北京奥运会对高校体育教育的影响

奥运会是青年的盛会,青年关注奥运最热情,青年参与奥运最直接,奥运因青年而活力四射,青春因奥运而绚丽多彩。2008年北京奥运为北京乃至全国的发展增添了强大的动力,也为高校体育教育创造了新的历史机遇,构建了新的实践舞台,提供了新的发展空间,提出了更高的历史责任和要求。本文探讨了2008年北京奥运会给高校体育教育带来的机遇与挑战。     

奥运间接影响研究

本文选取二十世纪六十年代以来,奥运会举办国和地区的资料作为样本,对奥运引致性需求相关数据和资料进行了整理、分析和挖掘。总结了奥运引致性需求的一般特征。在此基础之上,对北京市奥运引致性需求做了分析与预测。     

奥运会与我国体育市场的开发

1984年尤伯罗斯第一次将商业化运作成功应用于洛杉矾奥运会中，使得奥运会有史以来第一次实现了盈利。从此，体育的商业化运作和体育市场的开发，就逐步成为各个国家提高体育运动水平的一股不可忽视的力量。重点分析了奥运前后体育市场开发的方法和应该注意的问题。     

人文奥运与档案工作互动研究

主要对人文奥运的概念、人文奥运与档案工作的互动关系、互动现状予以了论述,以期为2008年奥运会的成功举办略尽绵薄之力,同时,借此机遇,为我国档案工作的发展提供有益的理论参考和实践依据。     

Global sport mega‐events and the politics of mobility: the case of the London 2012 Olympics

This paper examines the politics of mobility which surrounded the London 2012 Olympics. We provide a critical discussion of the mobility conflicts, problems and criticisms which emerged from our research with local people in the Stratford and wider Newham areas of London, where most Olympic events were located. The paper is divided into four broad parts. First, we identify and discuss the relevant components of the ‘mobilities paradigm’ in social science which underpin our analysis. Second, we briefly outline our research methods, centring particularly on fieldwork and interviews with different social groups. Third, we examine in detail the six main themes of mobility politics which were evident at London 2012, relating to social context, event construction, event mobility systems, commercial mobilities, the mobile politics of exclusion, and contested modes of mobility. In doing so, we seek to extend the mobilities paradigm by introducing various concepts and keywords – notably on the three‐speed city, entryability, mobility panics, instrumental mobility, and corporate kettling – which may be utilized by social scientists to examine mobility systems in other social contexts. We conclude by reaffirming the significance of mobility‐focused research at sport and other mega‐events, and by indicating future lines of inquiry for social scientists.     

Branding national images: The 2008 Beijing Summer Olympics, 2010 Shanghai World Expo,and 2010 Guangzhou Asian Games

International mega or hallmark events such as the Olympics and World Expo, are believed to help brand national and government images of the host country. Existing studies explain that mega-event images are transferrable to a host country and/or government. Yet, such an assumption has not been widely tested, or studied with country cases. Furthermore, while international mega events are assumed to target chiefly the international community for country branding purposes, there is reason to assert that they may just as much aim at domestic audiences for regime's political legitimization. By focusing on China's recently hosted three mega events – the 2008 Beijing Summer Olympics, the 2010 Shanghai World Expo, and 2010 Guangzhou Asian Games, this study addresses these issues.