A Class of Multivariate Bilateral Selection t Distributions and Its Properties

This article proposes a class of multivariate bilateral selection t distributions useful for analyzing non-normal (skewed and/or bimodal) multivariate data. The class is associated with a bilateral selection mechanism, and it is obtained from a marginal distribution of the centrally truncated multivariate t. It is flexible enough to include the multivariate t and multivariate skew-t distributions and mathematically tractable enough to account for central truncation of a hidden t variable. The class, closed under linear transformation, marginal, and conditional operations, is studied from several aspects such as shape of the probability density function, conditioning of a distribution, scale mixtures of multivariate normal, and a probabilistic representation. The relationships among these aspects are given, and various properties of the class are also discussed. Necessary theories and two applications are provided.     

Asymptotic Results for Spatial ARMA Models

Causal quadrantal-type spatial ARMA(p, q) models with independent and identically distributed innovations are considered. In order to select the orders (p, q) of these models and estimate their autoregressive parameters, estimators of the autoregressive coefficients, derived from the extended Yule–Walker equations are defined. Consistency and asymptotic normality are obtained for these estimators. Then, spatial ARMA model identification is considered and simulation study is given.     

Estimating the order of moving average models: the max X2 method

The max X² technique for estimating rhe order of autoregressive processes (McClave (1976)) is extended to moving average models. The autöregressive-moving average duality is exploited by using the inverse autocorrelation function and the subset autoregression algorithm. The technique is demonstrated via simulations, and is applied to Box and Jenkins (1970) Series A.     

Univaiuate anu multivariate categorical data analysis for block designs

Analysis for univariate and multivariate categorical data in block designs is given and illustrated through examples. The univariate analysis compares the treatments on the basis of their pooled frequency distributions (pooled over blocks). The test statistic used is called Q after Cochran (1950). The large sample null distribution of Q is a chi-square. Analysis of p-variate categorical data (kth variable having ck classes, K=1,...,p) can be done by treating it as a univariate categorical problem with [d] classes. Very often [d] is large in relation to the size of the experiment. This makes the expected frequencies for some of the cells very small, making the univariate method inapplicable. In these circumstances it may be reasonable to compare the treatments on the basis of marginal distributions up to the mth dimension, 1[d] , which is given in this paper. This method is also illustrated for missing observations     

On Calculations Involving the Maximum Cell Frequency

We describe a method of computing the cumulative distribution function of the maximum and minimum cell frequencies in sampling distributions commonly encountered in the analysis of categorical data.The procedure is efficient for exact or approximate calculation in both homogeneous and non-homogeneous cases, is non-recursive, and does not require Dirichlet integrals.Some related statistical problems are also discussed.     

An extension of bayesian measure of information to regression

This paper extends Lindley's measure of average information to the linear model, E(Y∣ß) = Xß. An expression which quantifies the average amount of information provided by the nxl vector of observations Y about the pxl vector of coefficient parameters ß will be derived. The effect of the structure of the regressor matrix, X, on the information measure is discussed. An information theoretic optimal design is characterized. Some applications are suggested.     

Bootstrap method in ranking and slippage problems

In this paper, the bootstrap method of Efron (1979) is given for a ranking and a slippage problem, where the ranking (or slippage) is with respect to the mean of the distributions. The method is also applied to obtain a confidence interval for the largest mean.     

Least significant spacing for ‘one versus the rest’ normal populations

Consider sample means from k(≥2) normal populations where the variances and sample sizes are equal. The problem is to find the ‘least significant difference’ or ‘spacing’ (LSS) between the two largest means, so that if an observed spacing is larger we have confidence 1 - α that the population with largest sample mean also has the largest population mean.

When the variance is known it is shown that the maximum LSS occurs when k = 2, provided a < .2723. In other words, for any value of k we may use the usual (one-tailed) least significant difference to demonstrate that one population has a population mean greater than (or equal to) the rest.

When the variance is estimated bounds are obtained for the confidence which indicate that this last result is approximately correct.     

Estimating the mean of the selected uniform population

Let π_i(i=1,2,…K) be independent U(0,?_i) populations. Let Y_i denote the largest observation based on a random sample of size n from the i-th population. for selecting the best populaton, that is the one associated with the largest ?_i, we consider the natural selection rule, according to which the population corresponding to the largest Y_i is selected. In this paper, the estimation of M. the mean of the selected population is considered. The natural estimator is positively biased. The UMVUE (uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator) of M is derived using the (U,V)-method of Robbins (1987) and its asymptotic distribution is found. We obtain a minimax estimator of M for K≤4 and a class of admissible estimators among those of the form cY_max. For the case K = 2, the UMVUE is improved using the Brewster-Zidek (1974) Technique with respect to the squared error loss function L₁ and the scale-invariant loss function L₂. For the case K = 2, the MSE'S of all the estimators are compared for selected values of n and ρ=?₁/(?₁+?₂).     

Parametric Nonlinear Regression with Endogenous Switching

Based on the insightful work of Olsen (1980 Olsen , R. J. ( 1980 ). A least squares correction for selectivity bias . Econometrica 48 : 1815 – 1820 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) for the linear context, a generic and unifying framework is developed that affords a simple extension of the classical method of Heckman (1974 Heckman , J. ( 1974 ). Shadow prices, market wages, and labor supply . Econometrica 42 : 679 – 694 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], 1976 Heckman , J. ( 1976 ). The common structure of statistical models of truncation sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models . Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5 : 475 – 492 . [Google Scholar], 1978 Heckman , J. ( 1978 ). Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system . Econometrica 46 : 931 – 959 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], 1979 Heckman , J. ( 1979 ). Sample selection bias as a specification error . Econometrica 47 : 153 – 161 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) to a broad class of nonlinear regression models involving endogenous switching and its two most common incarnations, endogenous sample selection and endogenous treatment effects. The approach should be appealing to applied researchers for three reasons. First, econometric applications involving endogenous switching abound. Secondly, the approach requires neither linearity of the regression function nor full parametric specification of the model. It can, in fact, be applied under the minimal parametric assumptions—i.e., specification of only the conditional means of the outcome and switching variables. Finally, it is amenable to relatively straightforward estimation methods. Examples of applications of the method are discussed.