《通典·边防典》"吐火罗"条史料来源与《西域图记》

本文对《通典·边防典》“吐火罗”条史料来源进行较详细的注释,并恢复了《西域图记》有关吐火罗国的一条佚文。在此基础上,进一步探讨了《隋书·西域传》与《西域图记》的关系及《通典·边防典》“西戎”门的编纂特点。     

一个多民族文学融合互动的范本——《述善集》文学文献价值考述

“Tangwu” is an alternative name for the descendants of the Xixia dynasty. In 1227 AD, a number of these Xixia descendants moved inland after the destruction of the Xixia Dynasty by the Mongolians. One group of them migrated to the area near Puyang, Henan Province. Tangwu Chongxi ( Yang Chongxi ) of the Yuan Dynasty compiled the Shu San Ji, which is divided into three volumes: Shansu, Yucai and Xingshi, and appended with the biography of Boyan Zongdao. It reflects the historical origins, social class, living conditions and the relations with the Han people of the descendants of the Dangxiangqiang minority af-ter they moved to Puyang. This book attracted a lot of attention in academic circles, and it was there-fore reorganized and published in 1985 after being treasured by the people for more than 600 years. It has high academic value for its comprehensive his-torical records. We can not only acquaint ourselves with the history of the make-up of the Chinese na-tion, but also research this diversity from multiple perspectives, such as history, nationality and folk-lore . That is why it has drawn so much attention a-mong academic researchers. The book contains po-ems, prose and biographies, which belong to dif-ferent celebrated scholars from different ethnic mi-norities, all of whom had relationships with Tang-wu Chongxi. It is also a typical model of Qiang-Han literature, which is very rare. This paper gives a preliminary exploration on the book, and shows a small part of its comprehensive value. Shu San Ji is not a merely personal collec-tion, but is also different from general literature collections. The compilation of the book took a long time. Shu San Ji Xuxie ( Continuation of Shu San Ji) , written by Zhang Yining, was finished in the 18 th year of the Zhizheng Period in the Yuan Dynasty (1358), which indicates that the Shu San Ji had already been finished by that time . Zeng wuwei chushi yangxiangxian xu ( Presented to Chu Shi Yang Xingxian·Preface ) , written by Wei Su and finished in the 24 th year of Zhizheng ( 1364 ) , suggests that the Shu San Ji had been compiled in-to a book by that time, and that it was compiled with the compositions of social celebrities of the time. However, the Shu San Ji, as it has been handed down to us today, includes the Song Yang-gong Xiangxian gui Tanyuan xu ( Preface of Send-ing Yanggong Xiangxian Back to Tanyuan) by Tao Kai, written in March in the 5 th year of Hongwu in the Ming Dynasty ( 1372 ) . It indicates that Yang Xiangxian kept on collecting articles even after the book was finished. The Xu yangshi yiji ( Preface of Yang’s Last Collection) by Wang Chongqing, writ-ten in the 6th year of Jiajing (1527), indicates that the Shu San Ji was still being written after Yang Chongxi’s death. At the end of the Shu San Ji , Boyang Zongdao zhuan ( Biography of Boyang Zongdao) and Weiti shi (Poems) were collected in the 16 th year of Zhengde in the Ming Dynasty (1529) and in the 16th year of Shunzhi in the Qing Dynasty (1629), respectively. It suggests that the
Shu San Ji had been supplemented and continually recompiled since Yang Chongxi firstly finished his book in 1358. After 271 years, in 1629, the Shu San Ji, as we read it today, was finally comple-ted. Through the basic components of the Shu San Ji,readers can understand that the Tangwu family was a harmonious, multi-ethnic family. A number of multi-ethnic writers spent long periods compos-ing works collected in the Shu San Ji and Tangwu Chongxi was also influenced by China’s diverse culture and traditional Confucian culture. The work is strongly connected with his study in Guozixue. In the late Yuan Dynasty, the restora-tion of the imperial examinations promoted Confucianism’s influence further. Pan Di, as Tang-wu Chongxi’s teacher in Guozixue, wrote most arti-cles in the Shu San Ji, which shows their close re-lationship and his influences on Tangwu Chongxi’s literature and Confucian studies. Tangwu Chongxi and others’ works reflected their sense of admira-tion for and deep feelings for their Dangxiang an-cestors, but more so helped to propagate the con-cepts of Confucian edification, diligence, thrifti-ness and benevolence, and some of them did so in a very polemic way. For example, Boyan Zongdao wrote the Jiefu xu ( preface of “Jiefu”) and Tang-wu Chongxi wrote the Jiefu houxu ( epilogue of“Jiefu”) , which reflect the social reality and ide-ology of all scholars with different ethnic back-grounds at that time. His work, “Tangwu gong-bei” fushi ( Poem inscribed on Tangwu Tablet ) , was written in a plain and authentic way and showed that he always remembered his origins and his ethnic desire to inherit the family’s heritage. Meanwhile , it was also mixed with the popular ide-as of upholding the honor of their ancestors from the central plains and Han areas, which shows the
editorial purpose of the Shu San Ji and also dem-onstrates the value of Chinese multi-ethnic litera-ture and cultural integration.     

楚风北渐与秦风东渐——论秦嘉､徐淑的文学地位

秦嘉、徐淑的诗歌既渊源于秦风,又超越秦风,融合了文人的才学灵感和不同地域文化精神而展示出崭新的精神创造,其创作上的成功标志着汉代陇右地区文化的长足进步.秦嘉、徐淑夫妇对书信体文学具有开拓之功,徐淑《答秦嘉诗》是楚风、秦韵相融合的艺术结晶,并对文人五言诗创作具有推动之功.     

“课归商办”：析论陶澍整饬两淮盐务的主张和实践

“课归场灶”与“课归商办”代表了清代处理盐法主体关系的两种相向立场。陶澍力主后者并努力践行,虽总体并不成功,但其意义主要在于对“课归商办”的确认,在于对清初以来盐法动荡的某种稳定。在这个意义上说,陶澍在两淮的盐法主张和实践具有“变法”和“改革”的内涵。     

略论巴渝文化与蜀文化、楚文化的关系

巴渝文化与蜀文化是既有联系又有区别的两种文化。不同的自然环境与社会环境导致了巴文化与蜀文化在其发展过程中显示出不同的特色。巴渝文化与楚文化有紧密的渊源关系 ,这主要是由地域的相接 ,族属的渊源 ,文化基底相同及历史上交融互渗这些因素造成     

《四库全书总目》“小说家类”序文发微

《四库全书总目》"子部""小说家类"序文虽然只有200余字,但涉及小说多个方面的问题,具有不可忽视的价值。四库馆臣在继承并理性辨析前人观点的基础上,追溯了小说的起源,表达了他们对小说虚构性质的认知理念,对小说流派的辨析,对小说价值功用的阐述,从中也可见出《四库全书》不收唐传奇与通俗小说的原因所在。     

罗蕙锡与凌淑华小说的女性意识比较研究

罗蕙锡和凌淑华分别是20世纪20年代韩中两国颇具影响力的女作家及画家.她们通过小说表现了对封建思想和男权社会制度的批判,对自由恋爱和婚姻自主的追求,对女性独立的自我意识等共同的女性意识.但罗蕙锡着重从启蒙性质的女性主义立场出发暴露女性受到的社会压迫,而凌淑华则从进步的资产阶级知识分子立场出发,揭示了男权社会制度下资产阶级女性生活以及她们的病态和渴求.在创作手法上,她们分别以中国传统绘画的余白之美和写意手法及西方绘画中的光线和色彩搭配描绘环境和背景,使作品审美价值倍增.     

"算经十书"数学思想简论

"算经十书"是中国传统数学的经典。探索和追求精益求精的计算方法和技巧,讲究明确的思想依据,着力于灵活和广泛的应用,是其数学思想的精粹。"算经十书"构成了具有中华民族自身特色的传统数学体系,其发展主线是沿着探索、完善和提高"推步"前进的;它把擅长计算的推算和证明的推类结合起来,形成独特的传统风格和手段。中国古代数学的思想传统,在现代科学发展中,还具有很强的生命力。     

论《经义述闻》的语法观

<经义述闻>因其恢宏博大,不仅完全涵容<经传释词>所表现出的语言学思想--诸如"声近义通"的原则、"因声求义"的方法、"依文作解"的语境观点,而且几乎随处可见到至今仍有重要价值的语言观.王引之天才的语言审析能力和敏锐的语言感受能力,贯穿整部<经义述闻>,从而形成王引之的语言学思想.而王引之的语法观,既反映在<经传释词>对虚词的考释上,又反映在<经义述闻>对句法的推敲上,而通过对<经传释词>和<经义述闻>的比较研究,更便于深入理解王引之语法学思想形成的过程.     

简论郭沫若与蜀学传统(上)

文章描述了蜀学发展的基本线索,自西汉始是指儒学在蜀地的传播,北宋以"苏学"为代表形成学术特色,晚清成为经学研究的中心,"重文史"和"崇实学"是两大鲜明特征。在此基础上,结合郭沫若的所受教育、性格养成、思维方式等,分析了蜀学文化传统对郭氏的深刻影响。