西部民族地区旅游生态补偿政策实施的实践探索

The ethnic regions of Western Chi￣na are rich in ecological and cultural tourism re￣sources. At the same time, the regions are also ec￣ologically vulnerable areas with large populations of ethnic groups who have lived for a long time in poverty. Based on years’ investigation, it is obvi￣ous that tourism development, even though it can promote local economic development, has had a significant negative impact on the ecology, envi￣ronment and local communities. During the 18 th and 17 th National Congresses of the Communist Pary of China, a policy was announced to improve ecological compensation and accelerate the estab￣lishment of an ecological compensation mecha￣nism. So far, both government and academia have mainly focused on the effects and necessities of building a mechanism for ecological compensation. Of special concern, even if governments at all lev￣els sequentially enacted a series of policie with cer￣tain characteristics of ecological compensation, the public is still questioning the impartiality and legit￣imacy of the charges of such policy of ecological compensation. Thus, the task of implementing the ecological compensation policy faces many obsta￣cles. At present, the core research issue on eco￣logical compensation is no longer just the question of why it should be charged. This question was al￣ready clearly stated in official documents from cen￣tral government. Up to now, the core issues that need clarification are:in practice, how the charge be made; what amount of money should be charged;how will the revenue from the charge be used;how will the revenue derived from the charge be audited; and whether or not this charge can help to achieve government objectives in such a way.
Based on the unique background of the ethnic regions of Western China, this paper deeply analy￣ses issues of implementing policies such as ecologi￣cal compensation for tourism, including the illegi￣bility and legitimacy of who should pay, how much should be paid, and how to manage the funds im￣partially; and providing scientific and reasonable countermeasures to solve these practical problems. Compared with other industries, the tourism indus￣try became the pioneer for the practice of ecologi￣cal compensation as well as the research objective of ecological compensation studies. Some research￣ers defined ecological compensation for tourism as a system of regulating related ecological interests to protect the ecosystems of tourism destinations and promote sustainable development of the tourism in￣dustry ( Zhang Yiqun, Yang Guihua, 2012 ) . Al￣though such a definition is still fuzzy, at least it in￣dicates that the research of ecological compensation for tourism involves interdisciplinary fields inclu￣ding Economics, Sociology, Ecology and Tourism, etc. Currently, the research of ecological compen￣sation for tourism has insufficient first hand empiri￣cal research data. At the same time it has not yet had nationwide impact, either domestically or over￣seas. The research on implementing policies for the ecological compensation of tourism is at an early stage in China.
Obviously, it is hard to find sufficient re￣search results or research methods for reference, which brings certain limitations to this paper. To demonstrate the scope of this study, this paper de￣fined tourism ecological compensation as exploring the feasibility of spending fiscal revenue ( paid by tourism enterprises, tourists or other stakeholders) on protecting natural ecological environment. Based on this definition, this paper generated three actual issues with regard to implementing policies of ecological compensation for tourism, including the vagueness of the charge, the lack of unified, standard levies, and the non-tranparency of fund management. Combined with analyzing the current special background of implementing policies of ec￣ological compensation for tourism in the ethnic re￣gions of Western China, and by especially empha￣sizing the local communities of the ethnic groups who should be compensated, this paper tries to provide scientific and reasonable countermeasures consisting of implementing corresponding national policy, formulating correlated policy in accordance with local conditions and standardizing and institu￣tionalizing fund management. This paper not only attempts to support strongly implementing policies of ecological compensation for tourism at the insti￣tutional level, but also to coordinate the contradic￣tions between tourism development and ecological protection, and local community self - develop￣ment, hoping to achieve the win-win objectives of promoting an ecological compensation policy for tourism, tourism poverty alleviation and ecological civilization.     

西欧主要政党干部的培养与选拔探析

一个政党能不能不断培养和推出大批优秀的领导人才,在很大程度上影响着该党的政治能力。西欧政党在对干部的物色与发掘、提名与选举、监督与管理、干部的教育与培训等环节都形成了自己的突出特点,其干部培养选拔体现了突出的“选举导向”,干部选拔过程突出了公开性与竞争性原则,干部来源体现了一定的开放性与多元性,干部角色遵循了“非兼职”原则,保持了专业化、职业化。     

天主教会与西欧中世纪经济的复兴

因罗马帝国后期的内乱、日耳曼人大迁徙带来的长期战乱,致使西欧进入中世纪出现了土地荒芜、技术落后、经济发展长期停滞的局面,是天主教会组织带头进行农业垦殖、传播生产技术、建设公共设施,促进了经济的复兴。     

比较与融合:马克思主义哲学中国化的有效途径

与各种形式的哲学观点展开直接的对话交流,是当代中国马克思主义哲学发展过程中一个不可回避的现实境遇和路径选择。从我国改革开放和现代化建设的具体实践出发,着眼于世界历史变革和未来发展,以马克思主义哲学批判性思维为工具,分析比较中国哲学、西方哲学产生的不同文化背景、致思特点和理论旨趣,大胆地吸收借鉴其中所蕴藏的合理因素和思想营养,必将丰富充实马克思主义哲学的理论宝库,从而推进马克思主义哲学中国化的伟大历史进程。     

我国西部劳动力转移影响因素分析

目前,我国农村正处在社会主义市场经济的建立和向现代化农业的转变时期,由于东西部经济发展不平衡,西部农村劳动力的转移问题成为西部大开发和农民增收不容忽视的难题,同时也是其农村经济发展的突破口,只有顺利转移出农村的劳动力才能缓解人口过多对经济发展造成的压力.因此,探索影响西部地区实际需要的农村劳动力转移影响因素,是现实与发展的需要.     

贾谊和西汉政治、经济

贾谊提出众建诸侯的建议为文帝所采纳,并对后来晁错和主父偃很有启发。消除边患是贾谊治国方略之一。对于匈奴侵扰,文帝和景帝采取和、战结合,武帝则是先和后战,不同做法与贾谊方案是一致的。重视经济是贾谊思想的重要内容。由于这样思想主张得到实行,文景之治带来经济的发展。武帝时币制改革,事实上也是贾谊思想在政策方面的实现。     

时空的突破:文化折叠现象中的鲁迅

20世纪初以来,中西文化的交流碰撞,造就了中国现代文化意识多层次的沉积地带,产生了多种文化因素交融的折叠现象,造就了新的语境和文化态势,鲁迅的思想就体现了一种多元化文化意识因素相融合的结果,突破了传统文化的界线,为中国文化及其文学的发展拓展了空间。     

西部电影发展和中国现代性变奏

借助现代性视角来观照西部电影的转型,认为西方现代性主要是一种与过去断裂、向未来敞开、不断进步的时间意识,而由于多重的社会历史原因,中国现代性则体现为一种东方与西方、乡村与城市、封闭与开放对比的空间结构。中国西部电影作为中国现代性追求的生动隐喻和民族现代性体验的深刻写照,在其发展早期,主要从"城乡差别"的对比反差来现实主义地观照城市与农村、现代与传统、开放与保守等现代性反差及其对中国人造成的心灵震颤,而在后期,新世纪以来的"新西部电影"则回避现实,热衷于历史想象叙事,通过"朝野冲突"的戏剧冲突,浪漫地隐喻和象征了探索发展中的中国电影人既借鉴学习又力图对抗好莱坞产业强势的垄断、霸权的后现代矛盾与焦虑。     

论西学中译的文化杂合及非文化殖民性

通过明清以来的西学中译史,论证了西学中译的文化杂合及非文化殖民性,为防止后殖民翻译外延内涵无限扩大化提供了佐证。西学中译的主流不是后殖民翻译所能涵盖的,而是属于正常的文化交流和融合。中外文化和思想的交流从来都是双向的,不但来自西方的学说深刻地改变了中国人的思相和社会面貌．而且中国思想也在西方产生影响。     

中西人权观差异的历史文化反思

人权问题在很大程度上是一个文化问题。每个国家的人权观都是本国主流文化在人权领域的表现。中国和西方的人权观在诸多方面存在截然不同的价值定位和选择。中国人权观主张义务本位,西方人权观主张权利本位;中国人权观发生于礼治环境,西方人权观产生于法治环境;中国人权观侧重对超验人生价值的追问,而西方人权观侧重现实的功用;中国人权观重视群体的权利,而西方人权观重视个体的权利;中国人权观重视人际的和谐,而西方人权观侧重人际的界分;中国人权观侧重人生价值的完满,而西方人权观侧重人生日用的实现。西方人权观的致用性、个体性、务实性可以弥补东方人权观“有神无体”的制度性缺失;而中国人权精神的高远性、和谐性、完满性则可消除西方人权观“有体无神”的工具性僵硬。