勇敢追问真理的反抗与无可奈何的妥协——卡夫卡小说中的“悖谬”问题之一

卡夫卡小说中的悖谬问题之一,就是勇敢追问真理的反抗与无可奈何的妥协。正是这种悖谬赋予了作品更复杂、更含蓄的暗示性,从而创造了振聋发聩的警世意义和通往真理的可能性。     

认识把握中国特色社会主义规律的基本原则和方法

党的十八大报告首次正式明确提出“中国特色社会主义规律”。这一概念的提出是中国共产党在解放思想、实事求是、与时俱进思想路线指引下,科学把握和运用唯物辩证法基本原理解决中国改革和建设实践中具体问题的产物,是对“共产党执政规律”、“社会主义建设规律”、“人类社会发展规律”凝练和升华的产物,它在中国特色社会主义理论体系中有着重要的地位,对中国特色社会主义实践具有重要的指导意义。     

Truth and Rhetoric: The Promise of John Dean's Memory to the Discipline of Psychology

The paper unpacks the far‐reaching theoretical and practical issues that underlay the classical debate between cognitive psychologist Ulric Neisser and discursive social psychologists Derek Edwards and Jonathan Potter on Watergate witness John Dean's memory. Accounting for their disagreements, Neisser claimed the mantle of the cognitive‐ecological approach to memory and emphasized the psychologist's ultimate priority of truth over discourse, while Edwards and Potter claimed that of discursive/rhetorical psychology and focused exclusively on discourse over truth. As such, the debate at the time ended in mutual misunderstanding and the shadow of theoretical incommensurability. However, a rhetorical analysis of the arguments suggests that Neisser was right about truth when he intuitively sensed the importance of discourse, and Edwards and Potter were right about discourse when they did not lose sight of truth. Therefore, beyond the impasse there has remained a promise inherent in the debate: it demonstrated an imaginative attempt to undermine the absolute dichotomy of truth and rhetoric and demonstrate their mutual inter‐dependence. As will be argued, such integration of traditional concerns of the psychologist entails the re‐conceptualization of the discipline as political and moral science.     

马克思主义在中国的伟大胜利(英文)

1921年,以马克思主义作为指导思想的中国共产党的诞生,是从根本上改变中国人民历史命运的重大事件。建党90年来,中国共产党始终坚持将马克思主义与中国实际相结合,不断在实践创新进程中推进理论创新,带领中国人民取得了社会主义在中国的伟大胜利,这是中国人民唯一历史选择的胜利,是中国共产党的胜利,是马克思主义在中国的伟大胜利。历史证明,只有马克思主义才能救中国,实现马克思主义的中国化,必须不断推进马克思主义中国化的理论创新,归根到底是党坚持实事求是的思想路线。     

改革开放以来认识论研究状况概述

“文化大革命”以后,我国学术界在总结以往的经验教训、进行理论反思时,就一直在思考这样一个问题：为什么我们天天在学习《实践论》、《人的正确思想是从哪里来的？》,但我们的认识却总不能和实践相一致、主观与客观相符合,在实践活动中总是不断地犯这样或那样的错误呢？是不是我们的认识理论还有某些缺失、不到位的地方？带着这个问题,不少理论工作者开始重新审视、研究和分析以往在认识论方面存在的问题。改革开放以来有关认识论问题研究的情况反映了学术界对这一问题理论反思的深度。     

An evaluative system for restructuring the literary history of modern China

当下的中国处于一个价值多元的时代,以往的建立于进化论、阶级论和启蒙主义 的文学史观也是颇有价值的;但是,进入21世纪,由于“以人为本”与“和谐社会” 目标的提出,也由于社会时空、文学功能和美学趣味的巨大变化,教材型的中国现代 文学史已远不能适应时代、社会和文学的发展需要,因此亟待重建和确立一个更为公 正、平等与合理的价值评估体系。这个评估体系是以人道主义为最高原则,以真、 善、美为三个闪光点,其最大优势是具有普适性、超越性、公正性和人本性的功能特 点。

关键词: 现代中国文学史?评估体系?价值重建?人道主义?真善美和谐统一

China is now in an era of multiple values. While there is some virtue in previous theories on the history of literature based on the theory of evolution, class struggle and the enlightenment, when it comes to the twenty‐first century, the histories of modern Chinese literature used in teaching are far from adequate for meeting the developmental needs of the times, society and literature. This is especially so in view of the putting forward of the goals of “putting people first” and “the harmonious society,” and the great changes taking place in time and space, the function of literature and aesthetic taste. Hence there is an urgent need to restructure this history and establish a more fair, equal and reasonable system of evaluation. Such a system would have humanism as its highest principle, and truth, goodness and beauty as its three virtues. Its great superiority would be its functional characteristics of universality, transcendence, fairness, and human‐centeredness.     

“TRUTH” AND “RECONCILIATION” AS SOCIAL INDICATORS

Countries throughout the world are trying to move toward a more democratic future through truth and reconciliation processes, under the assumption that truth causes reconciliation and that reconciliation contributes to democratization. But are “truth” and “reconciliation” concepts that can be measured rigorously and reliability? I present evidence in this article that each can be measured as an attribute of individuals, based on a large survey conducted in South Africa. My findings indicate that truth does indeed contribute to reconciliation. But because reconciliation is quite capable of changing (and likely to change) over time, efforts must be made to track levels of reconciliation as an important social indicator. Many countries in transition would profit greatly from implementing a Reconciliation Barometer to measure movement toward or away from the consolidation of democratic reform.     

马克思政治哲学：戏仿及其真理程序

马克思的政治哲学讨论通常显示出一种二元的抑或戏仿的写作特征,这在本质上是唯物辩证法的文本样态。通过自觉或非自觉的戏仿写作,马克思既彰显了批判锋芒,又保持了通向革命的实践审慎。政治哲学的戏仿起初是马克思用以应对普鲁士语境的自觉的写作策略和意图,而后进一步发展为启蒙批判的文本意识,以启蒙的话语来揭示后启蒙时代资本主义社会的内在矛盾。在历史唯物主义的完整呈现中,戏仿不仅表达为“消灭哲学”的哲学,更表达为消灭“永恒真理”的真理诉求。正是通过对近代政治哲学文本的戏仿,马克思“破坏”了压制现实性的语词世界,使得文本及其意义掌握了改变历史的物质力量,并促使文本的意义在后世不断突破语词边界,在今人的阅读和实践中获得延异。     

对王夫之哲学本体论基础的再思

王夫之在主客、体用之间互为条件的交互性上,建立了一种基于主客交互性的关系哲学,超越了认为主观或客观的某一方有着绝对的逻辑优先性的思维模式。事物不仅在属性上发生着变化,而且事物的存在本身就处在一个不断重新生成的过程之中,由此,道、人性同样处在一种新陈代谢、生生不已的过程中。王夫之过程论的哲学基础建构,打破了线性、僵化地看待世界的方式,张扬了天与人存在的创生性、能动性与开放性,对人的本体论地位和人在世界中的意义作了一种革新性的诠释。     

柏拉图式恋爱的内涵及其美学意义分析

尽管人们对柏拉图式恋爱耳熟能详,但是其内涵却时常遭受误解。结合柏拉图的《会饮篇》与《斐德罗篇》,从美、善、真方面对柏拉图式恋爱进行三维解读可以完整呈现其内涵。作为真善美统一的柏拉图式恋爱具有重要的美学意义,它驱散痛苦的阴霾,实现了生命的艺术化;它冲破现实的束缚,实现了生命的自由化;它获致形而上的品格,实现了生命的超越化。柏拉图式恋爱可以使人类诗意地栖居于大地上。