今韵古风——论埃兹拉·庞德诗歌翻译和创作中的仿古倾向

本文旨在通过解析庞德诗歌创作和翻译中的仿古特征,探讨其文学观。庞德的现代主义诗学原则已为人们熟知并认可,然而对他“以古为本、推陈出新”的文学观及其创作中一直坚持运用古体语言和仿拟古体诗歌形态的仿古倾向,却存疑很多。本文通过分析庞德不同阶段的作品,阐述其如何以古典诗歌翻译为先导在诗歌创作中灵活地运用古典诗歌语言和体式使其作品具有今韵与古风相得益彰的特点,并由此指出:庞德从灵感到创作都深深侵浸在一种崇尚古韵的意识之中,而且这种意识与其现代主义诗学创新意识交织在一起,二者既冲突又融合;冲突是表面的,融合才是其实     

论古希腊悲剧中公共领域与私人领域

人在渴望和平秩序与理想社会的创建时,同时渴望人性的自由发挥。当人渴望人性自由发挥时,又不愿人类的积极价值观念被现实生活欲望冲动所摧毁,悲剧性冲突常常由此产生。在古希腊悲剧中,以神圣价值为人的价值的前提,以城邦共同体的自由前提为生活理想的现实,前者属于私人领域,后者属于公共领域,不以前者削弱后者,这是个体自由作为共同体自由的基础;不以后者侵犯前者,这是人成为真正的个体的理性保障。     

Career Development and Gender Pay Disparities in State Employment in Greece

Much existing western‐based literature on gender argues that deregulated institutional mechanisms have a detrimental impact on gender segregation and pay differentials. However, there is little empirical evidence to confirm the opposite in highly regulated systems such as those in Greece, even though there are strong reasons to suggest that it may be quite different here because of the unusual gender division of labour and endemic patriarchal norms. An apt example of this is national state employment in which centrally determined work processes reflect societal discriminatory structures. This article examines the impact of institutions on career development and its potential effects on gender pay disparities in state employment in Greece. It attempts to achieve this by exploring the extent to which rule‐based systems may overturn gender bias in one public organization in Greece. The study suggests that exogenous parameters may shape centrally imposed institutional frameworks both in terms of facilitating and hindering career progression and thus pay.     

论中东民族与宗教交往问题--《中东国家通史·塞浦路斯》编后记

站在人类文明交往论角度,具体论述了中东民族与宗教交往问题,企图从时间、空间、人际相处这三个文明交往的基本条件上,分析了塞浦路斯的希腊族和土耳其族缺乏塞浦路斯国家观念,并指出希腊族更多的是欧洲属性,而土耳其族更多的是土耳其属性,正是这些因素,使两种文明难以融合起来,这些是成为当今塞浦路斯民族和宗教冲突的深层因素.     

亚里士多德中庸观及其现代启示

在古希腊的传统思想观念中,中庸之道无论对科学、技术还是艺术或者对思想、情感和行为,都是最理想的方式方法。亚里士多德的中庸思想直接继承古希腊这一传统思想,他在汲取前人思想的同时,根据当时社会状况,对中庸思想在理论上作出论证,并作为一项准则在伦理学、美学、政治等各个领域里加以使用。应当说,亚里士多德的中庸伦理观作为一种对于人的情感和行为的道德指南,在历史上产生了深远的影响。     

西塞罗的国家观

西塞罗的国家观包括五个方面的内容:把国家看作公民的联合体,试图从"城邦"中抽离出"国家"这一概念,用res publica代替城邦指称普遍意义上的国家,在一定程度上突破了城邦观念的束缚;用历史演进的眼光看待国家起源,把国家看作具有独立伦理价值的精神实体,通过对私有财产的强调,为国家观注入了非伦理因素;继承了古希腊思想家的政体学说,把国家划为三类七种,始终坚持共和政体是最优越的政体;基本上把国家看作高于个人的联合体,但通过对国家的定义和对公民私有财产权的强调,为他的国家观蒙上了个人主义色彩;接受了自然法学说,力主法治,构建了一个庞大的法律体系,以维护共和制,但后期的"元首制"(princeps)构想反映了他的人治倾向。     

古希腊与中国古代的美德比较

古希腊和中国古代的美德,都追求善。善在古希腊表现为五种美德,在古代中国表现为五种道德规范。这五种道德,有四种可以互相对应,只有古希腊的勇敢,和中国古代道德不能对应。古希腊的美德,强调以智慧为基础,在价值取向上以征服为主旨,形成了西方的理性主义传统。而中国的道德,强调以仁为基础,在价值取向上以服从为主旨,最终形成中国重伦理的传统。这两种传统,对中西方民族的影响是非常巨大的。     

清末民初诗歌翻译规范的多样性

我国诗歌翻译大兴于清末民初,通过分析这一时期的诗歌译介代表人物梁启超、马君武和苏曼殊对拜伦的《哀希腊》的翻译发现:受当时的社会环境和译者自身主体性的影响,三人翻译的预先规范各不相同,其操作规范也千差万别。梁译注重诗歌的思想性,苏、马更注重诗歌本身的艺术性和译语文化的可接受性。这表明在我国诗歌翻译兴起初期表现出了预先规范的不确定性和操作规范的多样性。     

Economic valuation of coastal water quality and protest responses: A case study in Mitilini, Greece

The aim of this study was to evaluate environmental benefits resulting from the construction of a Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) in Mitilini, Greece. The main benefits identified were the improvement of the coastal water quality and subsequent impacts on citizens’ activities. The valuation was conducted using the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) through the elicitation of individuals’ willingness to pay (WTP). Due to the significant amount of zero and protest responses, different measurements of mean WTP were calculated and the need for further research on social factors which influence individuals’ valuation is emphasized.     

A Christmas Tree in Flames and Other – Visual – Stories: Looking at the Photojournalistic Coverage of the Greek Protests of December 2008

In December 2008, the killing of a fifteen-year-old boy by the Greek police triggered the country's worst civil unrest in decades and an outbreak of rage and violence, which turned into a wider protest expressing deep popular discontent and frustration with ageing problems in the country. Through a content analysis of themes appearing in eight media of different genre and political orientation, and using solely images as units of analysis, this paper examines the visual framing of these protests and its function in the public screen. The findings show that two frames are used to imply a distinction between Us (as normal citizens who protest peacefully) and Them (as ‘hooded hooligans’ who protest violently).