中华女子学院教工运动会管理系统的设计与应用

中华女子学院教工运动会管理系统采用Visual Basic＋Access的体系结构，具有友好的操作界面，使用方便，能够完成从赛前报名、比赛编组、成绩统计、得分计算到成绩报告单的打印输出等运动会的各项信息管理和组织功能，大大提高了工作效率，并在实际应用中发挥了良好作用。     

对高校电子阅览室数据存储及光碟共享方案的思考

高校图书馆电子阅览室数据存储、光碟共享的现状令人堪忧 ,为解决阅览室光盘共享中的种种问题 ,应采用虚拟光碟镜像服务器方案对阅览室的光盘库、光盘塔进行改革。该方案具有在线并发访问量大、经济实用、便于管理等多种优点     

广东工业大学材料与能源学院贫困生扶助工作的实践

文章对广东工业大学材料与能源学院的贫困生扶助工作进行了总结,提出了完善电子档案、开展勤工助学活动和国家贷款工作等措施。     

基于异构分类体系的书目数据库合并

将不同馆藏编码尤其是连分类系统都不相同的书库合并在一起,是一个综合性项目,涉及到很多因素。其中,选择一个好的书目数据合并算法十分重要。本文分析了书目数据合并时要处理的基本对象,建立了基于异构分类体系书目数据库合并的数学模型并讨论其解的情况,最后提出了解决这一问题需综合考虑的几个因素。     

指导性案例的实践功能与角色定位

我国指导性案例的效力经历的是由柔性到刚性转变的渐进过程,但人们却并未就其规制司法裁判的约束效力取得相同的理解和一致的认可。对此,人们可以制定出多种关于案例指导制度实践功能的描述性设计和规划,每种设想都有与之相对应的效力定位。但作为非正式的法律渊源,指导性案例的最终归宿必定是回应当下的司法现实,只有将其映射到社会生活当中,才能真正探究其制度运作的实践功能所在。其实,指导性案例的角色定位不当反映出理性与权威之间存在的悖论,与其将指导性案例的裁判理由和裁判要旨强加于人,不如充分发挥其理性说服的意蕴和效用,力求引导人们就诸多问题达成共识。     

主体资质影响合同效力之理论探析————以建设工程合同为例

通过案例整理发现,现行法律制度中,判定主体资质有瑕疵的建设工程合同无效的理由主要为违反效力性强制性规定和法人行为能力欠缺,但此种认定路径并不合适,以损害社会公共利益为判定理由更具正当性。对于主体资质失而复得从而恢复合同效力的司法解释,无论是法律行为的补正或确认制度,或以主体资质作为法律行为的特别生效要件等学说,都难以成为其理论依据。从保护特殊建筑的法规立法目的的角度,可以判定主体资质嗣后取得的合同有效,但这只能是少数情形。     

“阿尔都塞国家机器理论”视角下的苏报案

苏报案中章太炎、邹容分别被轻判的结果折射出晚清国家综合控制能力的薄弱。造成这一结果的原因有多方面。一方面,由于近代租界的特殊性加之行政系统运行效率低下,致使清政府镇压性国家机器在苏报案中难以发挥“暴力机关冶的作用;另一方面,由于意识形态国家机器的相对独立性、多样性,造成清政府与革命派在报刊舆论、法庭辩驳等意识形态领域呈现相互较量之势,也在一定程度上影响了最终的判罚结果。     

The Gendered State of Business: Gender,Enterprises and State in Israeli Society

Whether the state provides different entrepreneurial opportunities for women and men and how is an issue rarely discussed in the growing literature concerning gender and organizations. Integrating gender and organization literature with political theories of the state, this paper compares women's entrepreneurship in one setting (Israeli society) across two time periods: before and after the foundation of a sovereign state. Our analysis identifies three manifestations of the gendering state through which it moulds business opportunities of men and women entrepreneurs. We examine how these manifestations: the delegation of economic actors, managing interactions between individuals and institutions, and administering a bureaucracy, shape access to capital and the structure of networks. The article contributes to the existing scholarship by extending the understanding of direct and indirect influence of the state on the reproduction of the image of the ideal entrepreneur and on gender differences in entrepreneurial activity.     

Measuring Social Return on Investment

Strategic decision making and evaluation in philanthropic giving and social investment requires good‐quality information about the social impacts of that investment. One way to meet this need is by calculating a social return on investment (SROI) measure, akin to the return on investment (ROI) approach used in business analysis. Despite much buzz in the field, SROI measurements are rarely used, in part because of the complexity of the calculations but also because of a number of thorny and often expensive organizational challenges associated with implementing an SROI process. This article explores these implementation challenges by comparing four social venture organizations in the health care field—two in the Netherlands and two in the United States—that have utilized some sort of SROI measurement. We summarize the SROI process and identify the specific organizational challenges in each case. Lessons learned from this analysis include the value of process versus product and the importance of fitting the type of measurement to the organizational context. We conclude with a summary of best practices for organizations and social investors who might try to make effective use of SROI measures.     

Social Return on Investment for Good Foot Delivery

This article provides reflections on a social return on investment (SROI) research process with Good Foot Delivery, a work integration social enterprise in Toronto, Canada, engaged in package delivery and employing people with developmental challenges. The article has three aims: (1) to assess Good Foot's key business inputs, activities, and outputs, and the social impact that these have had on its key stakeholders for the 2013 calendar year; (2) to critically reflect on how the research team arrived at the SROI’s inputs, outputs, outcomes, proxies, and other findings; and (3) to discuss some of the strengths and challenges of the SROI process in practice.