理性极限及其突破断想

思维具有历史的特征.而理性思维只是人类思维的一个阶段.因此,理性思维及与之相对应的理性哲学都无法超越自身的历史局限.理性哲学缺失与当下生活的对应的根本原因就在于理性极限.而理性的偏见与虚妄的悲剧价值预设正是这种极限的表现.打破理性极限的前提是将理性还原于历史中并具体列出突破理性哲学的叙述方案.     

满族家庭生活教育概说

满族家庭生活教育内容主要包括:遵循家法、注意饮食、规律起居、重视医疗与养生、加强运动、保持节俭等积极方面的规范,以及对酗酒、吸咽、经商等不良行为的禁忌.这些教育提高了满族的生活素质,增强了其身体素质,同时也提高了民族的整体素质.     

生命周期评价与环境伦理

评价材料与环境协调性的生命周期评价方法有环境伦理的哲学基础,是环境伦理的核心观点的科学体现。然而,从科学角度来看的生命周期评价方法的局限性则未必真是它的局限性,在对其作出环境伦理学的说明之后,有些局限性不过是哲学与科学的内在矛盾的体现,是科学自身的局限性的折射而已。     

Continuity and change in work-life balance choices

This paper explores the ways in which the work-life balance choices made by heterosexual couples differ in different generations, how such choices are gendered, and the extent to which 'individualization' provides an adequate conceptualization of the effects of social change on heterosexual couples. It argues that processes of individualization need to be seen in the context of changing social institutions, and that it is the de-institutionalization of 'the family' and the life course that is leading to a de-gendering of work-life balance choices. The paper draws on findings from a restudy of the family and social change and a study of the gender dimensions of job insecurity both of which were carried out in the same geographical location. The studies provide evidence of generational change in work-life balance choices and increasing occupational differentiation between heterosexual partners. This leads to a situation where increasingly choices are made which blur gendered boundaries and which has been made possible by a process of de-institutionalization of the male breadwinner family. Our findings support the contention that processes of individualization are more apparent amongst younger than older generations and that, because of changes external to the family, there is more negotiation and pragmatism amongst younger generations about work-life choices.     

柳浪馆:生命的反思与了悟——漫议袁宏道六年乡居的意义

在袁宏道短暂的43年人生中,曾有过六年的乡居时光。他的这一乡居,并非逃离世事,而是静下心来体悟生命的意义。其体悟之核心,除在自然怀抱安顿身心外,就是向禅学寻求对生命意义的开掘。     

回收竞争下考虑CSR行为的闭环供应链定价决策及协调

研究考虑企业社会责任(CSR)行为的闭环供应链定价决策及协调问题,分别构建了单个第三方回收及两个第三方回收竞争下的闭环供应链博弈模型,分别从企业与消费者两个视角分析了CSR投入对供应链成员的定价策略及系统总收益的影响,并建立了基于“收益共享”与“回收成本共担”相结合的契约协调模型。研究表明,两个第三方回收商间的适度竞争不仅可以降低产品价格、提升废旧产品回收效率,同时对提高企业的CSR投入水平以及收益水平也起到积极的促进作用。最后,在契约参数的可行性范围内,“收益共享-成本共担”契约在使供应链总收益达到最大的同时,还成功改善了每个成员企业的收益。     

实践性知识:教师专业生活场景中的新视角

笔者认为教师的实践性知识应称为"互动场景中的经验总和".那么教师专业知识来源于何处?教师是如何在专业场景中提升实践性知识的?笔者在教师实践性知识的研究中,试图从教师专业生活中梳理出几块实践性知识产生的场景,在较为具体场景中展开分析.笔者试图描绘的场景包括三个方面:课堂教学、师生互动和师师互动、个人生活.     

Living Arrangements and Quality of Life Among Chinese Canadian Elders

This paper examines the role of living arrangements in thequality of life of community-dwelling Chinese elders (aged 65 andover) currently residing in Vancouver and Victoria, BritishColumbia. Data are based on a random sample of 830 persons[response rate = 71.5%], who were interviewed in their homes inthe language of their choice in 1995–96. Three dimensions ofquality of life – satisfaction, well-being and social support –are examined for married men and women [living with spouse alonevs. living intergenerationally] and widowed women [living alonevs. living intergenerationally]. Few differences are found formarried persons, especially women; for widows, living alonesignificantly reduces quality of life in a number of areas.Regression analyses indicate that living arrangements are not asignificant predictor of life satisfaction or well-being formarried men and women. For widows, living arrangements determinewell-being but not life satisfaction.Overall, age, health status, and social support (havingfriends/confidante) are better predictors of quality of life forelderly Chinese Canadians than are living arrangements. Findingshighlight the importance of: empirically distinguishing maritalstatus and living arrangements in studying the quality of life ofelders; not homogenizing Chinese Canadian seniors with regard toliving arrangements; and focussing on Chinese elderly widows wholive alone as a group at risk of low well-being.     

Measuring longevity achievements under welfare interdependencies: a case for joint life expectancy indicators

Whereas period life expectancy constitutes an intuitive indicator of the survival conditions prevailing at a particular period, this paper argues that, given the existence of welfare interdependencies, that widespread indicator is nonetheless an incomplete measure of the longevity achievements relevant for human well-being. The central importance of coexistence for human-beings implies that usual life expectancy measures should be complemented by joint life expectancy indicators, which measure the average coexistence time under particular survival conditions. After a study of the theoretical foundations of ‘single’ and ‘joint’ life expectancy indicators, it is shown that joint life expectancy measures tend to enrich significantly the comparison of longevity achievements across countries and periods. Moreover, the introduction of joint life expectancy indicators—as a complement to conventional life expectancy measures—into multi-variable indexes such as the United Nations’ HDI is also shown to affect international rankings of standards of living to a non negligible extent.

论日常生活和日常认识

日常生活是一种基础和本真的生活,它具有个人性、基础性、经验性、自发性和重复性等特点。日常认识是日常生活的一个有机组成部分,日常生活决定着日常认识,日常认识反过来又影响和制约着日常生活。和日常生活相适应,日常认识具有大众性、平凡性、直观性、表层性和不自觉性等特点。