浅谈声乐教学中记忆力的意义和培养

本文从心理学的角度阐述了记忆能力在高等学校声乐教学中的意义，以及这种能力的培养，并强调了在声乐教学中，教师记忆能力培养的特殊性及学生和教师记忆能力的培养是双向性。     

分整、协整及时变波动建模理论新进展——兼论诺贝尔经济学奖得主Granger和Engle的工作

综合分析近20年来经济计量建模理论在分数维长记忆时间序列的分析建模、协整(同积)理论的建立以及刻画经济金融波动的时变条件异方差过程的分析建模三个方面发生的重要变化以及在这些领域,Granger和Engle做出的极其重要贡献,并提出新的发展方向和领域。     

战型文本:现代汉语诗学话语的重要文本形态

现代汉语诗学话语,是在与敌对阵营的艰苦斗争和同一阵营的互相辩驳中发展壮大的。在此过程中,现代汉语诗学留下了数量可观的"战型文本"。其中,有针对性极强的显性战型文本,也有暗中较劲的隐性战型文本。在显示出针对性与尖锐性的同时,战型文本也暴露出有所偏颇甚至极端偏激的不足。产生大量战型文本的原因,一是为了抢夺与捍卫话语统治地位,新旧诗学之间必然爆发话语战争;二是新诗学战胜旧诗学之后,为瓜分话语权力必然爆发内部话语冲突。     

记忆的测量模型

本文讨论了正态分布下的信号检测法，对数分布下的信号检测法，双高阈限模型法和非参数模型法等四种具有代表性的记忆测量模型并对以上模型的分辩力指标和反应倾向指标作了分析说明．     

免疫信息系统的数据安全与应用

随着社会的进步,居民生活水平的不断提高,疾病防护与儿童免疫全面信息化管理已经成为社会趋势。而对于该系统的数据安全问题就更显得十分重要,本采用双机热备份系统,对数据进行实时备份。     

Institutionalizing Counter‐Memories of the U.S. Civil Rights Movement: The National Civil Rights Museum and an Application of the Interest‐Convergence Principle

During the post–Reconstruction era in the United States, white southerners marked the cultural landscape with monuments and memorials honoring the Confederate cause and its heroes. These racialized symbols enjoyed an undisputed claim to public squares and parks throughout the South. It was not until the late twentieth century that commemorations to the black freedom struggle were publicly supported. This analysis examines the institutionalization of counter‐memories of the civil rights movement in Memphis, Tennessee at the Lorraine Motel, the site of the assassination of Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The author draws on collective memory, cultural trauma, and social movements research as well as critical race theory to explain the creation of the National Civil Rights Museum. Using primary and secondary data sources the author examines how social memory agents, a changing political culture, and the passage of time mediated the cultural trauma of King's assassination and influenced the institutionalization of oppositional collective memories. Relying on Derrick Bell's interest‐convergence principle, the author concludes that the creation of this major memorial museum was a result of the convergence of white and black interests, specifically the economic and political interests of white elites and the cultural and political interests of black symbolic entrepreneurs.     

认知方式与线索提示对学龄儿童基于事件前瞻记忆的影响

通过严格控制实验程序,首次考察认知方式和线索提示对8岁、10岁、12岁学龄儿童EBPM的影响,并分析学龄儿童EBPM的发展趋势后发现：（1）8-12岁儿童EBPM能力仍在持续向前发展;（2）认知方式在儿童EBPM加工过程中扮演着重要角色,对年幼儿童（8岁和10岁）来说,场独立者更善于完成EBPM任务,而对12岁儿童来说,场独立者与场依存者都可以很好地完成EBPM任务;（3）线索提示有助于学龄儿童完成EBPM任务,并能弥补场依存儿童EBPM能力上的不足。研究结果支持PM多重加工理论。     

群体交互记忆系统成因机制研究

在调研84个知识团队,共338名成员的基础上,以共享心智模型和行为信任为中介变量,从团队成员的专长、任务和人际3个方面的特性出发,构建了一个“环境基础-内化条件-知识系统”的整合模型.研究结果显示,团队成员的专长异质性、任务互依性和关系强度对交互式记忆系统产生正向影响.共享心智模型和行为信任完全中介了专长异质性和任务互依性对交互记忆系统的作用,部分中介了关系强度对交互记忆系统的影响.在控制变量中,团队规模对交互记忆系统存在负向影响,团队历史和任务复杂性对交互记忆系统具有正向影响.     

From Restored Past to Unsettled Present: New Challenges for Jewish Museums in East Central Europe

This article examines the institutional development of Jewish museums in Prague, Budapest, and Bratislava from 1989 to the present, with special reference to their role as agents of cultural memory. I consider how these museums contribute to the formation of Jewish identities in post-communist societies, which are themselves struggling to form collective identities. After analyzing the institutional structures and exhibition concepts of these museums in relation to shifts in the politics of representation, I propose a core area on which each museum could base its future development.     

The shtetl in the museum: representing Jews in the eras of Stalin and Putin

This article considers the representation of the shtetl in two museum narratives devoted to Jews in Soviet and post-Soviet Russia. The first, the state-funded 1939 exhibit “The Jews in Tsarist Russia and the USSR” was organized by the Jewish Section of the State Museum of Ethnography in Leningrad and remained on display to the Soviet public until the Nazi invasion in June 1941. The second is the privately funded Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center in Moscow, which opened in 2012. Though conceived under radically different ideological and political circumstances, each exhibition conveys a significant message about the place of Jews in Soviet and post-Soviet society, respectively, and each positions the shtetl as a formative arena for Jewish civic identity vis-à-vis the Russian homeland. Across the chasm of over seventy years, these two museum projects raise strikingly similar questions about how and why cultural institutions are mobilized to define the relationship of Ashkenazi Jews and the state. In both cases, the shtetl plays a significant role in narrating this unequal relationship.