论无原则的批判

思想的一般本性规定为批判,也就是对于事物边界的划分。无原则的批判,既否定立场,也否定根据,是一种无立场和无根据的思想,它只关注事物本身的显现,也就是实事求是。     

“It’s Not About You”: Disappointment as Queer Pedagogy in Community-Engaged Service-Learning

ABSTRACT

Increasingly popular in the neoliberal university, community-engaged service-learning (CESL) courses offer rich yet contradictory opportunities for LGBTQ studies students to synthesize queer critiques of community and identity with experiences in LGBTQ communities. Much CESL scholarship has focused on the tensions between benefits to community and to students, prioritizing either radical social change or student satisfaction. Beside such debates, I propose the queer ethical, pedagogical, and political value of disappointment in the tedium and contradictions of community itself. Such queer disappointment, I contend, might enable students to cultivate the emotional and critical capacities to engage in community work on sustainable, dedramatized, and unentitled terms.     

中国日常生活批判多学科研究综述

兴起于20世纪八九十年代的日常生活批判理论是以人自身的现代化为宗旨,植根于中国现代化进程中的具有相对独特性的文化哲学理论。经过20余年的发展,中国的日常生活批判已取得阶段性的成果,并辐射到文学、史学、教育学、法学、伦理学和城市规划等不同领域,显露出自身潜在的创造力与生命力。     

Entanglements of Evidence in the Turn Against Critique

Over the past decade, a range of theorists have argued that critique, in its rigid pursuit of hidden truths, has become routinely dismissive of everyday attachments and geared towards a diagnosis of error. To explore the turn from critique, this essay revisits two of the most influential arguments against the hermeneutics of suspicion, by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Bruno Latour. It argues that while these theorists present a divisive account of methods and their potentials, when read closely, the points of differentiation between critical and post-critical methods are intriguingly mutable. These critiques of critique, animated by concern and premised on experience, trouble their own accounts of critique’s identity. The turn against critique encourages critics not to summarily dismiss ways of thought as simply and irreparably wrong. In keeping with this aim, this article asks if there might be a way to rethink, rather than retrench, critique.     

A Critical Appraisal of the 1998 Meta-Analytic Review of Child Sexual Abuse Outcomes Reported by Rind,Tromovitch, and Bauserman

SUMMARY

The goal of this article is to present a methodological critique of the 1998 meta-analysis of child sexual abuse outcomes by Rind, Tromovitch, and Bauserman. Seven major concerns are addressed. Rind et al.'s view is, at best, extremely limited. By restricting a supposedly broad meta-analysis to only some of the population in question, the conclusions they drew regarding this complex topic, primarily that adult-child sex is not necessarily harmful, are invalid.     

Keeping open by re‐imagining laughter and fear

Speaking to the debate on the nature of critique, this article is about the struggle to produce an account when listening to and retelling stories. It begins with the disconcertment over listening to a coherent story that emerges in interviews about the development of performance indicators for Dutch hospital care. The indicators are presented as solutions to the problem of unruliness in the healthcare world. Drawing on Helen Verran's work on generative critique I slow down the ‘problem‐solution‐found’ plot. Instead of contrasting the apparently coherent stories with the complexities of an ‘underlying’ practice of healthcare, I hold on to my initial disconcertment so that ‘fleetingly subtle’ interruptions become entry points for generative critique. Taking Eduardo Viveiros de Castro's understanding of the relation that fear and laughter have to alterity, I show how fear and laughter permit generative critique within seemingly coherent stories. In the case of indicator development, the interviewees ‘laugh away’ what they consider alter from quality and safety in healthcare: having no control over what is going on, polyglotism instead of a common language, and inaction as opposed to taking one's time. Paying attention to disconcerting interruptions generates sensitivity and questions rather than yet another set of (critical) problem‐solution‐found answers. How can ridiculed (laughed away) subjectivity be acknowledged as important entry points for including alterity in supervision? And how to position the acknowledgement, not as an antidote, but as a way of rendering the fear of alterity generative? Nurturing sensitivities is crucial for keeping open, which means resisting both the sticky tendency of normalizing accounts and the fallacy of misplaced concreteness. I conclude that keeping open by re‐imagining critique resonates with the creativity of collective life in actual times and places. Thereby it offers a promising potential for doing worlds differently.     

形而上学二分法与法兰克福学派的艺术理论

法兰克福学派的艺术理论常常被认为是浪漫主义的。当人们提到法兰克福学派艺术理论的时候,“审美乌托邦”几乎已经成为它的代名词。然而,通过对隐藏在“审美乌托邦”这一评价背后的那种普遍信念的存在论基础进行批判性的反思表明,这一公认的评价是值得商榷的。这一评价的得出与形而上学之基本建制对日常生活的统治紧密相连。通过对这一问题的研究,能够为法兰克福学派艺术理论之基本性质的进一步认定和研究澄清前提。     

民间文化形态下的贫民视点——老舍小说文化批判原点的选择

老舍是民间社会的代言人,这样一种叙述身份确立了老舍的写作立场和写作姿态,因之而产生的贯穿于老舍整个文学创作过程中的那种贫民视点使得他的小说不仅仅具有了一种浓郁的"平民精神",而且更深层次地表达了其与"底层"人民的价值观和情感世界相融一致的"平等感"。也正是由于这种贫民视点,使得老舍能从新文化运动和西方文化的热潮中脱颖而出,造就了老舍小说独树一帜的文化批判性。     

弘扬优秀传统文化必须处理好几种关系

如何对待传统文化是人类在自身发展过程中所面临的永恒主题。自 2 0世纪七、八十年代掀起了传统文化热以来 ,人们对待传统文化 ,仁者见仁 ,智者见智。要弘扬中华民族优秀传统文化 ,必须正确处理好“史”与“论”、“一体”与“多元”、“真”与“美”、“古”与“今”、“中”与“外”、“继承”与“创新”的关系。以科学的态度弘扬民族优秀传统文化 ,架起一座连接传统文化与现代文化的桥梁     

论中国经济学体系的建构

经济学的发展总是和批判联系在一起的.中国传统政治经济学侧重对资本主义制度的批判,却忽视了对社会主义基本经济规律的研究,造成中国经济学体系事实上的不完整性.本研究在分析传统政治经济学缺陷的基础上,对建构中国经济学的新体系做了深入的探讨.