Progress and cumulation in the human sciences after the fall

What do we mean by progress and cumulation in the social and human sciences? Recent thinking in the philosophy and history of science has led to an abandonment of some versions of logical positivism and of verificationism that had a strong deductive and theory testing orientation. What is to replace them is less clear. This paper argues that progress and cumulation can be seen as a process of evaluation and retention within an epistemic community. Scholarly disciplines differ in their social structure and in their epistemic and normative commitments. Since sociology is a fragmented discipline, progress and cumulation differ within its multiple subdisciplines, which to varying extents represent epistemic communities. Brief sketches of progress (advance) and cumulation in several subdisciplines are offered.     

绿色设计中的材料选择

绿色设计首先要选择绿色材料，使用环境友好性的材料，以减少产品对环境的危害；尽量减少材料的种类和数量，不仅可以节约能源，还可以减少废物的排放量；还要使材料具有循环性，以延长产品的寿命，减少废物，使人和自然和谐发展。     

当代景观设计的内涵及外延深化研究

景观设计是一门新兴学科,它是溶城市与生态环境规划、改造、保护和恢复的综合性系统工程。在我国的历史很短,但却发展迅速,为推动我国社会的文明化和现代化进程做出了贡献。但是,也凸现了一些内涵定位和外延的科学性与现实性问题,这些问题不仅关系到民族的审美意识和价值取向,也关系到国家基本建设资金使用的最优统筹化。     

烟台市长江路交通信号线协调控制的设计思路与方法

简述了把传统的解析计算法和计算机仿真优化法相结合的线协调控制综合设计方法及设计流程.以烟台市开发区主干道长江路线协调控制为例给出了具体的设计方案,对设计方案进行了评价.     

构筑知识的基础——胡塞尔、弗雷格方法论比较

现象学学派和分析哲学学派都是20世纪哲学界的显学。本文认为独特的方法论原则往往能使哲学家在哲学探索中独辟蹊径,现象学学派和分析哲学学派的成就与两派各自独特的方法论原则息息相关,因此,本文试图追寻哲学史发展的脉络,比较研究充当“领头羊”角色的两位哲学巨匠胡塞尔和弗雷格的方法论原则,以加深对现象学方法和分析哲学方法的理解,洞察二者思想的精微之处。     

"中国哲学史"的歧义与中国哲学的未来

中国哲学史的未来建设要处理如下一些问题:哲学和哲学史的关系;一般和个别的关系;中国概念中包含的古今中西以及文化、地理和阶级性的关系;哲学与科学、宗教的关系;当代史和本来的历史的关系等问题。     

马克思对鲍威尔哲学的三次批判

马克思对鲍威尔理论进行了三次批判。在《论犹太人问题》中批判鲍威尔犹太人的观点;在《神圣家族》中集中批判了鲍威尔的理论核心——自我意识哲学;在《德意志意识形态》中对鲍威尔的观点进行了彻底的清算。这种批判过程既是马克思不断廓清自己过去的哲学信仰的过程,也是不断走向历史的深处、建构科学唯物史观的过程。     

产品设计的行为导向模式研究

长久以来,用器物文化规范社会秩序,引导人们行为都是社会发展的主题。但随着工业化大生产和以追求销售为目的的商业设计的出现,产品设计的行为导向问题受到了忽略。该文从研究日常行为,引导积极的行为,克服不良行为,创造新行为,形成设计文化,实现行为导向功能的可持续发展等方面对生活中常见的一些产品设计进行了实例分析。以探究如何设计产品来引导积极的行为、情感效应和避免消极的负面行为的发生。     

拟正则图的最大边边连通度(英文)

定义了图的边边连通度,设计了一类具有最大边边连通度的拟正则图。     

The ecosystem blueprint: How firms shape the design of an ecosystem according to the surrounding conditions

Ecosystems are formed by organisations that jointly create a value proposition that a single firm could not create in isolation. To deliver this value proposition, the partners need a focal firm, the orchestrator, to be align them towards the joint value proposition. Thus, how orchestrators design the alignment structure of an ecosystem is at the very heart of the ecosystem concept – yet it has not been sufficiently addressed by extant research. This is all the more true for the question of how the design of an ecosystem is shaped depending on surrounding conditions. This paper applies a qualitative study with ten cases and, based on the attention-based view of the firm, contributes to research on ecosystems in several ways. First, it explains which ecosystem designs are beneficial under which conditions. Second, it elucidates the structure and activities within ecosystems and shows that start-ups can be just as good ecosystem orchestrators as incumbents. Third, it explains the circumstances under which single vs. multi orchestrator ecosystems occur. Fourth, it presents the conditions when incumbents or start-ups make better orchestrators. Finally, it is among the first studies to apply the attention-based view to business ecosystems, and shows that doing so yields intriguing insights into this emerging field of research.