A test for bivariate symmetry based on the empirical distribution function

Hollander (1970) proposed a conditionally distribution-free test of bivariate symmetry based on the empirical distribution function. In this paper Hollander’s test statistic is examined In greater detail: in particular; its conditional asymptotic distribution is derived under the null hypothesis as well as under a sequence of local alternatives. Percentage points of the asymptotic distribution are presented; a power comparison between Hollander’s statistic and the likelihood ratio criterion in testing a variant of the sphericity hypothesis in multivariate analysis is made.     

Empirical bayes interval estimates involving uniform distributions

Bayesian and empirical Bayesian decision rules are exhibited for the interval estimation of the parameter 0 of a Uniform (0,θ) distribution. The estimate ?,δ>resulting in the interval [?,?+δ]suffers loss given by L(?,δ>,θ)=1-[?≦e≦?+δ]+c₁((?-θ)²+(?+δ?θ)²))+c₂δ. The solution is presented for prior distributions G which have bounded support, no point masses,∫θ^?mdG(θ)<∞ and for some integer m. An example is presented involving a particular parametric form for G and rates of risk convergence in the empirical Bayes problem for this example are calculated.     

Asymptotic distribution of regression type estimators of parameters of stable laws

Asymptotic distributions of regression-type estimators for the parameters of stable distributions am obtained. The asymptotic normalized standard deviations of the estimators are computed for various values of the parameters and various choices of the number of points used in getting the regression estimates.     

Maximum likelihood ridge displays

I illustrate likelihood methods for estimating the consequences of shrinkage along any ridge path as well as methods for picking a two-hyperparameter path of optimal curvature and the optimal point on that path. In addition to my published "classical" methods, I also illustrate both the empirical Bayes and the random coefficient maximum likelihood approaches. Traces of risks for known parameters and losses for simulated responses are followed by traces of estimates that can reveal the same general information.     

An emplrical bayes approach in estimating the parameters of the or more geometric distributions

The estimation of the parameters of two or more geometric distribuionsis considered by usinq an empirical Bayesian approach. Robbins (1983) gave empirical Bayes estimates if the number of distributions N is large, buthere we consider the cascwhore N is small. The parameters of the prior distribution areest imated by looking at maximum like lihood and momentest imation methods.     

The relative performances of improved ridge estimators and an empirical bayes estimator: some monte carlo results

The relative 'performances of improved ridge estimators and an empirical Bayes estimator are studied by means of Monte Carlo simulations. The empirical Bayes method is seen to perform consistently better in terms of smaller MSE and more accurate empirical coverage than any of the estimators considered here. A bootstrap method is proposed to obtain more reliable estimates of the MSE of ridge esimators. Some theorems on the bootstrap for the ridge estimators are also given and they are used to provide an analytical understanding of the proposed bootstrap procedure. Empirical coverages of the ridge estimators based on the proposed procedure are generally closer to the nominal coverage when compared to their earlier counterparts. In general, except for a few cases, these coverages are still less accurate than the empirical coverages of the empirical Bayes estimator.     

Nonparametric bayes estimation of the survival function from a record of failures and follow-ups

In some observational studies, we have random censoring model. However, the data available may be partially observable censored data consisting of the observed failure times and only those nonfailure times which are subject to follow-up. Suzuki (1985) discussed the problem of nonparametric estimation of the survival function from such partially observable censored data. In this article, we derive a nonparametric Bayes estimator of the survival function for such data of failures and follow-ups under a Dirichlet process prior and squared error loss. The limiting properties such as the mean square consistency, weak convergence and strong consistency of the Bayes estimator are studied. Finally, the procedures developed are illustrated by means of an example.     

Estimation of parameters and reliability from generalized life models

Simultaneous estimation of parameters with p (≥ 2) components, where each component has a generalized life distribution, is considered under a sum of squared error loss function. Improved estimators are obtained which dominate the maximum likelihood and the niinimum mean square estimators. Robustness of the improved estimators is shown even when the component distributions are dependent. The result is extended to the estimation of the system reliability when the components are connected in series. Several numerical studies are performed to demonstrate the risk improvement and the Pitman closeness of the new estimators.     

Extension to higher dimensions of the jaeschke-eicker result on the standardized empirical process

The asymptotic distribution of the sup-norm of the heavily weighted empirical process is established in the multidimensional case. This theorem extends in particular the famous result in Jaeschke (1975, 1979) to higher dimensions. There is a striking difference between the behaviour for higher dimensions and that for dimension one, especially the limiting distribution is now a simple transformation of a standard exponential random variable.     

Kolmogorov-type tests of goodness-of-fit against stochastic ordering

This article addresses the problem of testing the null hypothesis H₀ that a random sample of size n is from a distribution with the completely specified continuous cumulative distribution function F_n(x). Kolmogorov-type tests for H₀ are based on the statistics C⁺ _n = Sup[F_n(x)?F₀(x)] and C^? _n=Sup[F₀(x)?F_n(x)], where F_n(x) is an empirical distribution function. Let F(x) be the true cumulative distribution function, and consider the ordered alternative H₁: F(x)≥F₀(x) for all x and with strict inequality for some x. Although it is natural to reject H₀ and accept H₁ if C ⁺ _n is large, this article shows that a test that is superior in some ways rejects F₀ and accepts H₁ if C^mdash _n is small. Properties of the two tests are compared based on theoretical results and simulated results.