辽宁老工业基地“新失业群体”的社会生存状况研究——基于社会排斥的分析视角

辽宁老工业基地“新失业群体”的社会生存状况与自身的先赋资本、人力资本及社会资本确实有密切关系,这些因素导致了其在就业中遭受一定的社会排斥。“新失业群体”的父辈由于本身的失业下岗而沦为社会的弱势群体,而且由于辽宁老工业基地特殊的体制转轨境地,使之遭受到社会和家庭的双重挤压。     

An individual-based model for competingDrosophila populations

An individual-based model forDrosophila is formulated, based on competition amongst larvae consuming the same batch of food. The predictions of the model are supported by data for single speciesDrosophila populations reared in the laboratory. The model is used to build a simple discrete model for the dynamics ofDrosophila populations that are kept over a number of generations. The dynamics of a single species is shown to give either a stable equilibrium or fluctuations which can be periodic or chaotic. When the dynamics of a species in the absence of the other is periodic or chaotic, we found coexistence or two alternative states, on neither of which the species can coexist.     

论竞争法中两种限制竞争行为的区别与联系

限购排挤行为,是指公用企业或者其他依法具有独占地位的经营者,为了排挤其他经营者而限定他人购买其指定的经营者的商品的行为。滥用行政权力限制竞争行为,根据《反不正当竞争法》第7条的规定,是指政府及其所属部门滥用行政权力,限定他人购买其指定的经营者的商品,限制其他经营者正当的经营活动,或者限制经营者跨地区、跨部门的交易,干扰、阻碍正常的交易活动的行为。限购排挤行为与滥用行政权力限制竞争行为是两种不同的限制竞争行为。对二者进行合理、有效的规制,是竞争法的重要任务。作者阐明这两种行为的概念、特征、法律规制之必要性,并在此基础上对二者进行比较分析,有助于正确地认识和规制这两种行为。     

美国印第安农村人口的经济现状

20世纪在经济复苏背后,美国印第安社会依然存在低收入、高失业率、持续贫困问题。透过美国印第安农村人口的经济现状,分析了影响印第安经济现状的几大客观因素:地理、人口与受教育状况、就业结构与收入水平、产业结构以及美联邦福利制度的转向。最后,从社会学的角度入手,认为导致印第安农村人口持久贫困的根源存在于主流社会的排斥机制之中。     

高校家庭经济困难学生的社会融合问题研究

伴随我国高校招生规模的不断扩大和高校收费制度改革的推进，高校出现了“家庭经济困难学生”这一特殊群体。高校家庭经济困难学生遭受社会排斥的形式表现为经济排斥、同群排斥和心理排斥。国家、社会和学校应该高度关注高校家庭经济困难学生的社会融合状况，国家资助政策是高校家庭经济困难学生融合的有力途径，应进一步完善资助政策体系，有针对性地开展思想政治教育和心理健康引导。     

权利效能视角下的非法证据排除

非法证据排除的权利效能是辩方排除非法证据的实际效果与法律授予的理想权利之间的比值。非法证据排除规则赋予了辩方较大的权利,并随着诉讼进程而增强。但实际所取得的效益却是逐程减弱,并最终在庭审阶段降至权利效能的最低点。这种尴尬局面是由法律、制度以及辩护策略等原因造成。从诉讼结构出发去研究权利效能,对于完善该制度具有功能意义,应从保证控辩双方效能值的全程一致、限制法官自由裁量权与完善辩方权利行使机制三个方面着手构建。     

‘How dare you pretend to be disabled?’ The discounting of transabled people and their claims in disability movements and studies

Although the contours of the ‘disabled person’ category are questioned by anti-ableist activists, they remain rigid regarding transabled people (who want to become disabled). For anti-ableist activists, transabled people do not count as disabled. They are perceived to: be falsely disabled; steal resources from disabled people; and be disrespectful by denying, fetishizing, or appropriating marginalized realities. By combining critical discourse analysis, genealogy, and deconstruction, I examine these negative discourses to encourage alliances between anti-ableist activists and transabled people. Ideas developed in disability and trans studies reveal the limits of these discourses anchored in ableist and cisnormative* assumptions.     

欧盟反社会排斥的社会政策发展研究——以劳动力市场问题为例

建立解决劳动力市场问题的反社会排斥的社会政策,一直是欧盟促进社会融合与一体化发展的主要手段。本文首先从社会排斥概念的诠释入手,分别从学术层面与欧盟层面进行社会排斥概念解析和社会排斥概念政策应用解析。其次分析了欧盟目前解决劳动力市场问题的社会政策发展现状:鼓励更多的社会成员更有效地参与劳动力市场,提高社会融入程度;增强工人和企业的适应性,减少潜在的社会排斥;发展人力资本政策,打破社会排斥的恶性循环。本文最后对欧盟反社会排斥的社会政策面临的挑战进行简要分析,并讨论了欧盟反社会排斥的社会政策发展对中国社会政策发展的借鉴意义。     

Complicated Problems,Complicated Solutions? Homelessness and Joined‐up Policy Responses

The government has recently signalled its determination to address both the symptoms and causes of homelessness through the introduction of new legislation requiring local authorities within England and Wales to develop strategic approaches to addressing this issue. Moreover, in common with many other areas of social provision in recent years, the “joining‐up” of services has been identified as a central tenet of these new approaches. In the case of homelessness, then, experience gleaned from other policy fields may prove an invaluable resource, in terms both of guiding approaches and in avoiding potential pitfalls. This paper examines the findings from a study undertaken within one Midlands city to investigate this assumption. Based upon evidence from this study it is suggested that, while precedent can offer this particular policy area valuable lessons, homelessness is an issue which, due to its multi‐dimensionality, offers new and unique challenges of its own.     

CISG适用默示排除意思自治之分析——以约定适用中国法律为视角

CISG（《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》）规定系任意性规范,允许当事人排除CISG全部或部分内容,以适用当事人约定的法律或约定的权利义务。在合同当事人约定适用我国法律时,此约定表面符合默示排除 CISG的适用,最终CISG仍得到适用。这一结果虽始料不及,却符合法律推理逻辑并具有法学理论依据。细究此结果的发生,主要原因系我国条约独特的适用方式。我国对于类似CISG条约的“接受”规定体现在民事基本法中,非如其他国家那样显示于宪法。在当事人实行意思自治并约定适用我国某一特定的民事部门法时,由于CISG包含于约定的民事法律之中,导致CISG的适用。