谈“以德治国“与思想政治工作的关系

文章对“以德治国”与思想政治工作的关系进行了论述,文章认为思想政治工作是“以德治国”的重要组成部分,“以德治国”是思想政治工作的指导思想和重要内容,“以德治国”为思想政治工作作用发挥创造了有利条件,“以德治国”对思想政治工作提出了更高的要求。     

企业科研单位图书馆的读者工作

本文对企业科研单位图书馆的读者服务工作结合实际进行分析和探讨 ,就企业科研单位图书馆今后如何进一步提高读者服务工作的质量 ,从而更好地为科研生产服务 ,提出了自己的看法和设想。     

Gay Affirmative Practice: A Model for Social Work Practice with Gay,Lesbian, and Bisexual Youth

Gay affirmative practice has recently been introduced into the social work literature as a culturally sensitive model for working with gay, lesbian, and bisexual (GLB) adults, however, this model has rarely been applied to practice with GLB youth. In this article, the authors review the literature to present the main tenets of gay affirmative practice, outline the challenges that GLB youth face, and delineate the environmental and individual strengths that can be enhanced to promote well-being. The authors then apply the gay affirmative practice model to GLB youth, offering concrete information about the specific knowledge, attitudes, and skills that social workers should acquire to better serve the unique, yet diverse, needs of GLB youth.     

异化及其扬弃——当前思想政治教育面临的困境与专业社会工作的启示

思想政治教育的异化使教育已经不是一种心力合一的过程,受教育者已经不能从中学到东西.产生这种异化的原因是:思想政治教育本质的改变,社会价值与个人价值相分离,单向强制灌输,教育内容上的滞后.要走出思想政治教育的困境,从专业社会工作的视角出发,对价值取向、育人关系、育人手段、工作者角色等几方面进行思考.     

高等学校实施素质教育当议

高等学校是培养德、智、体全面发展的人才,对大学生不仅要注重知识的传输,同时也要加强个性、人格和心理品质等方面的教育,本文针对目前高等学校的教育现状,阐述了加强大学生素质教育的必要性和现实意义;提出了加强大学生素质教育的主要做法;指出了加强大学生素质教育应注意的问题,以期引起教育和教育管理工作的注意,全面提高高等教育的教育质量,为社会培养更多有用的合格人才。     

新形势下党风建设环境的思考

党的作风集中体现着党的形象 ,党的形象关系着党在人民群众中的威望和人心的向背 ,由此可知党的作风建设的重要性和必要性。但要搞好新形势下的党风建设 ,惟有对现阶段党风建设面临的有利和不利的环境有清醒的认识 ,才能找出党风建设的良策所在 ,使党风建设落到实处     

合作学习在大学英语教学中的应用

由美国一些教育家倡导的合作学习是以学生为中心的教学方法,适合外语学习的特点,在世界上许多国家推广.将合作学习的方法灵活地应用于大学英语教学,不仅能够提高非英语专业学生的英语听说能力,营造良好的课堂气氛,还能够培养学生的学习自主性和人际交往能力.     

新形势下思想政治工作应坚持以人为本

面对新的形势,思想政治工作唯有坚持以人为本,才能增强其实效性。     

家庭档案及其教育功能探析

家庭档案在人们社会生活中的重要作用日益凸显;就教育功能而言,突出地表现在家庭档案可以提供德智体、美育、心育等方面的教育内容;同时,家庭档案也是一种积极有效的教育手段:能促进自主学习与自我教育,有利于家庭积极参与社区教育和社会主义精神文明建设;能促进学校的教育教学工作,有利于家教合作。档案部门、家庭、学校等有关方面应积极协作,加强宣传力度,加强公众的档案意识,向公众提供建设家庭档案的业务指导,加强家庭档案的建设,以充分发挥其教育功能。     

Forced to work and liberated from work

The work-welfare nexus is essential in all social policy regimes. The question is in what situations individuals should be entitled to social welfare benefits and in which situations they should be obliged to work. Social welfare law and administrative practices define mechanisms that separate the deserving poor from people able to work. This article analyses the functions and character of these "separation mechanisms" in Sweden during three periods in history: a) in rural society in the late 19th century; b) in industrial society during the successful years of the Swedish model from World War II until the late 1970s; and c) the present, including the period of welfare retrenchment and reconsideration since the early 1980s. The conclusion is that Swedish social policy has always been strongly work-oriented, but the specific form and content of the work ethic has varied under the influence of different ideologies and handled in different social policy institutions. Under specific conditions the work line has been either generous or restrictive and it has been based on structural attempts to improve the opportunities to work as well as on attempts to strongly pressure the individual to work. The work line of today is seen as an interesting attempt to combine an effort to create good work through improved work conditions and an effort to reinforce elements of work enforcement in the social insurance system.