发生认识论的哲学来源

皮亚杰的发生认识论并不是一个纯粹的发展心理学理论,而是一个关于认知的结构及其发生与发展的理论。发生认识论的建立有其深厚的哲学根源:它是在批判传统认识论中的经验主义和理性主义的基础上建立起来的。皮亚杰看到,无论是经验主义方法,还是理性主义方法对于认知的结构及其发生与发展的解释都是片面的,因为前者忽视了结构,后者假设了结构而没有注意到结构发展的自然进程。皮亚杰在对两者辨证综合的基础上,提出“发生学的结构主义”,指出认识的发生与发展是因为我们作为生物先天地就包含着这样的结构,而且是因为我们作为生物对结构进行主动建构的结果。     

也说复合词的深层结构和表层结构及其理据性

乔姆斯基提出句子的深层结构和表层结构的学说。王希杰又发展为汉语复合词也有深层结构和表层结构。汉语谐音趣难词这两种结构不一致的情况更复杂,是对王先生论述的补充和支持。     

渝西经济走廊县域产业结构:一些发现及解释

应用对应分析方法对渝西经济走廊各区市县的三次产业结构进行了实证研究,分析了该经济区产业结构及发展水平的县域差异,同时发现该经济区三次产业结构总体上呈"三足鼎立"的均衡格局,据此提出了调整产业结构、促进工业化与城镇化协同发展的四大策略:结构趋异、产业集群、人口聚集和商贸拓展。     

高校社会捐赠与构建和谐社会

社会利益结构是和谐社会构建的基础,高校社会捐赠属于公益捐赠,是捐赠者的一种经济社会行为。从分析社会利益结构的发展变化出发,运用经济社会学的基本原理,分析认为高校社会捐赠对于构建和谐社会具有重要意义,针对我国高校社会捐赠事业发展的现状,提出了对策和建议。     

山西省农业产业结构分析

采用纵向与横向相结合的研究方法,分析了山西农业产业结构。认为目前山西农业产业结构不尽合理,与发达省份存在较大差距。需要采取提高产品竞争力、强化市场意识、推进农业产业化经营、调整种植业内部结构、加强农业基础设施建设等措施,以促进山西农业产业结构的优化。     

甘肃省县域经济发展水平空间差异分析

甘肃省包括86个县区,受地理位置、气候条件、资源状况、经济基础各种因素的影响,各县区之间的经济发展水平差异显著但又有很多相似之处。为了定量揭示甘肃省县域经济发展水平在空间上的分布现状、差异以及相似性,笔者拟运用多元统计方法对甘肃省县域经济发展水平的空间差异分析     

汉语学现代转型的前提批判

在漫长的历史发展过程中,西方语言文字(印欧语)是沿着音声中心/文字弱化的路径演变的,音义二极性是西方语言学的大前提。而汉语言文字自秦汉以来发生的形态类型简化和汉字形声化的整体演变趋势,则是音声弱化/文字中心的演变路径,形音义三极性是汉语学的大前提。由于中西语言文字类型的体制性差异,汉语学理应把现代转型理解成一个包含三重辩证对立同一关系的概念体系:对立于传统,即现代与前现代应在本体论上实现辩证同一;对立于自身,即元语言与对象语言、主观语法与客观语法应在认识论上实现辩证同一;对立于西方,即个性与共性、民族性与现代性应在方法论上实现辩证同一。     

An evaluation of the childhood family structure measures from the sixth wave of the British Household Panel Survey

Summary.  The paper performs an evaluation of the data that were collected in the sixth wave of the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) on childhood family structure. After comparing such data with a large number of studies by using external sources, we find that the BHPS data overestimate the proportion of people who report an experience of life in a non-intact family during childhood by about 10%. Although an explanation based on recall error that deteriorates with the age of the BHPS respondents is possible, the overestimation is likely to be accounted for by non-ignorable attrition that may affect most of the comparison studies based on longitudinal data. Conversely, comparisons with other independent measurements from the BHPS itself reveal that the wave 6 data underestimate the proportion of young people who have lived at least part of their childhood in a non-intact family by about 8%. The probability of disagreement between these two sets of measures is strongly associated with poor interview characteristics, which may affect the comparison measure more than the wave 6 measure. Despite such differences, there is therefore a substantial degree of similarity between the family structure information that was collected in the sixth wave of the BHPS and the host of highly diverse records against which it has been compared.     

关于有效促进社会公正的几个问题

本文认为:(1)为了顺利地推进改革,为了中国社会经济持续、有效和健康的发展,就必须适应新的历史条件,顺应民意、顺应现代社会的基本趋势,把社会公正放到一个突出的位置。(2)在中国现阶段应当开始建立一个初级的社会公平保障体系。初级社会公平保障体系的基本特征是低水准、广覆盖、有实效。对于国家来说,近期需要做的事情可以分为两大块,一是国家的直接投入,二是国家的立法、监督、执行和引导。(3)有一些根深蒂固的观念在妨碍着我们重视社会公正问题。这些观念主要包括:“原始积累不可避免”,“国家财力不足”,“重视公正便会妨碍效率”,因此我们必须对这些观念进行一番必要的反思。(4)要想构建一个公正而和谐的社会,就必须培育一个庞大的中等收入者人群,形成一个“两头小,中间大”的橄榄型的社会结构,那么社会就会变得越来越稳定了。     

The ecosystem blueprint: How firms shape the design of an ecosystem according to the surrounding conditions

Ecosystems are formed by organisations that jointly create a value proposition that a single firm could not create in isolation. To deliver this value proposition, the partners need a focal firm, the orchestrator, to be align them towards the joint value proposition. Thus, how orchestrators design the alignment structure of an ecosystem is at the very heart of the ecosystem concept – yet it has not been sufficiently addressed by extant research. This is all the more true for the question of how the design of an ecosystem is shaped depending on surrounding conditions. This paper applies a qualitative study with ten cases and, based on the attention-based view of the firm, contributes to research on ecosystems in several ways. First, it explains which ecosystem designs are beneficial under which conditions. Second, it elucidates the structure and activities within ecosystems and shows that start-ups can be just as good ecosystem orchestrators as incumbents. Third, it explains the circumstances under which single vs. multi orchestrator ecosystems occur. Fourth, it presents the conditions when incumbents or start-ups make better orchestrators. Finally, it is among the first studies to apply the attention-based view to business ecosystems, and shows that doing so yields intriguing insights into this emerging field of research.