早期马克思主义学者队伍分化的渊源探讨

早期马克思主义学者队伍分化有其客观必然性。转型期中国社会现实的复杂与多变,是导致队伍分化的社会根源;马克思主义在中国早期传播呈现出发展性和复杂性,是导致队伍分化的思想根源;早期马克思主义学者的队伍鱼龙混杂,是导致队伍分化的组织根源。早期马克思主义学者队伍分化又带有主体选择的偶然性。阶级立场、政治理念是影响主体选择的内在因素;党派聚散离合、人际网络等个人机缘是影响主体选择的外在因素。     

新论“书画同源”

从书法与绘画所使用的工具和材料的同一性角度出发,分析早期工具和材料对书画笔法的影响;同时论述了书画之间相互的影响和发展,以及笔墨的根本最终使两者在文人画中走向审美上的殊途同归。     

《史地学报》及其群体与《学衡》之关系的探讨

从吴宓到鲁迅,再到后来的研究者,都将<史地学报>和<学衡>紧密地联系在一起.将前者的核心人物、诸位同人和刊物本身三个层面与后者进行比较分析,不仅可以揭示1920年代在南京乃至全国学界甚有影响的两份刊物之间的密切关系与异同所在,同时也可展现当时相关学术群体的学术风貌.     

加强两岸学术交流发展民族传统史学

20世纪以来,进一步继承和发展民族史学是两岸学人的共同要求,努力从传统史学遗产中总结出中国民族史学的精华,以发展新世纪史学,两岸学人从不同方面都做出了显著的成绩。在新形势下加强两岸学术交流,对于推进民族史学的发展,弘扬中华传统文化,有着重要的历史和现实意义。     

18世纪中韩文人学士之间的友好交流

18世纪的中韩文化交流主要是通过往来于两国的使节活动进行的。尤其是从18世纪后半期,朝鲜朝“北学派”的文人、学者,以使节团随员或检书官的身份来到中国,直接同中国文人学士接触,并通过笔谈在思想文化、文学艺术、科学技术等领域进行坦诚的交流,为两国文化交流的发展做出了重大贡献,对两国社会的发展产生了不可忽视的重要影响。回顾18世纪中韩两国文人学士之间友好交流的历史,对21世纪中韩文化交流的发展,将具有重要的借鉴意义。     

论古代失节文人心态

失节文人是中国古代知识分子中的一个特殊群体 ,一直是人们羞于谈论或深恶痛绝的对象 ,他们当中不少是著名诗人或文化名流。当我们撇开道德评价 ,从传统文化的角度来考查其失节的深层次原因时 ,我们或许不只是鄙视 ,还会多一分宽容。     

Intersectionality Is Not a Choice: Reflections of a Queer Scholar of Color on Teaching,Writing, and Belonging in LGBTQ Studies and Academia

ABSTRACT

Drawing on my experience as a queer, genderqueer, Puerto Rican counselor educator, this article considers how LGBTQAI+ studies and academia can expand to better include people with multiple marginalized identities. This article highlights some of the contradictions that educators face when engaging in the liberatory praxis that connects and creates a sense of belonging during these tumultuous times. This reflection suggests a decolonizing approach to intersectionality and highlights the importance of transcending binary discourse to engage in deconstructing the multiple layers of colonization in our internal and external spaces that is necessary for liberatory praxis. Finally, a few recommendations for how LGBTQAI+ studies and academia can support scholars with multiple marginalized identities are identified.     

Better know a Human Resource Development (HRD) scholar: a conversation with Robert (Bob) G. Hamlin

This article contains a conversation with Robert (Bob) G. Hamlin and is part of aseries that focuses on different human resource development (HRD) scholars. Theaim is to better understand the people behind the names we see in print and at HRD scholarly conferences. Bob is professor emeritus and chair of HRD at the University of Wolverhampton Business School, UK and a management and organization development consultant at Oaken Consultancy. Bob has spoken at many HRD conferences in Europe and the United States and was one of the founding members of the University Forum for HRD. The conversation explores Bob's career in HRD practice, research, teaching and management. Among the topics covered are the significance of practical experience and the influence it can then have on research, the power of evidence-based practice, and the need for HRD research to be seen as relevant and having utility within the world of practice.     

试析西方学者的“军人干政”概念

论文从探讨“军人干政”这一术语内含的价值判断出发,追寻西方学者提出该术语时所依据的政治理念,参照非西方国家的政治现实,说明用这一术语去分析非西方国家政治发展过程中出现的军人介入政治现象是不科学的。     

“文咏之士”与唐初八史的文学性

唐初八史的作者多为“文咏之士”,撰史善于叙事,喜取小说,文辞华美,使唐初八史呈现出浓郁的文学色彩;此外,唐初八史的尚文之风,唐初八史于史书中明确表达文学观的做法,都缘于著者的文士身份。