长三角地区农民资金互助合作社运行满意度及影响因素分析 ——以泰州市苏陈资金互助合作社为例

农民资金互助合作社是目前准新型农村金融机构在长三角地区的典型代表。基于对江苏省泰州市苏陈资金互助合作社的实地调研,重点考察社员对样本农民资金互助合作社运行的满意度及影响因素。研究发现：样本社社员对于农民资金互助合作社的整体运行情况基本持肯定态度;社员的家庭总收入、政府对农民资金互助合作社的支持力度以及社员在农民资金互助合作社借用的互助金额度,是影响社员对于农民资金互助合作社满意度的主要因素;农民资金互助合作社融资业务的开展,对于社员的农业和二三产业经营均具有正向促进作用;农民资金互助合作社的互助金投放的覆盖面与农村信用合作社等传统农村正规金融机构形成了互补关系。在此基础上,提出了相关政策建议。     

建立激励机制优化学生干部队伍

学生干部队伍建设关系高校的稳定和发展。建设高校学生干部队伍,必须以人为本,搞好选拔工作,优化学生干部队伍结构。应以机制创新为动力,抓好日常教育和管理,充分调动和发挥学生干部的积极性、主动性和创造性。     

政府:一个公正社会不可或缺的角色——关于政府再分配职能正当性的思考

建立一个公正的社会是人类的理想。在实现这一理想的过程中,政府承担着重要的责任。一个优良的政府不仅是善治的政府,而且也必须是能够维系社会公正的政府。政府的再分配职能,不仅能够为公民身份具有实质意义创造各种条件,而且也能延缓或减少自然秩序中的不平等因素与偶然性因素对人类命运的影响,改善政治共同体公民之间的关系,建构合理的政治秩序;不仅有助于改善社会弱势群体的生活境遇,而且也有助于提升社会整体的生活质量,实现社会成员低成本地和谐共处。政府再分配职能的正当性,体现在它力图构建一个公正社会的良善意图与行动之中,它为公民有尊严地生活提供了可能性,也超越了市场形式正义与丛林法则,减少了政治不作为可能带来的改变社会结构的暴力行动。政府以实现社会公正为目的的再分配行为,决不像新古典自由主义者所主张的那样必然使人类通往奴役之路,恰恰相反,它是迈向和谐社会的重要保证。     

Who cares? A lack of self‐care for women in the non‐profit/non‐governmental sector

In this article I examine the lack of self‐care regimes for women working in the non‐profit/non‐governmental sector. While I draw on ethnographic research conducted in the Malaysian context of women's organizations, the issue of self‐care for activists and feminist activists is a global one that crosses borders and boundaries. I explore the gendered nature of care and care professions to demonstrate how women are predominantly affected in these working environments. To date, there has been little scholarship on self‐care and care in non‐profit/non‐governmental working environments. Using interviews with women working in the sector, I argue that women's emotional, mental and physical health comes at a cost in these hectic workplaces. This article contributes to the literature on gender, work and care in women's organizations by taking seriously women's concerns working in these spaces, where they experience self‐neglect and institutional barriers in care regimes.     

At the intersection of globalization and ‘civilizational originality’: cultural production in Putin’s Russia

ABSTRACT

This special issue originates from a transnational collaboration of scholars in philology, comparative literature, social theory, sociology, anthropology, ethnography, and media studies. The collection strives to advance a research agenda built on the nexus of three intellectual and academic domains: post-Soviet ‘Russian cultural studies’, the research paradigm put forward by Cultural Studies, as well as empirical methods developed in sociology. The collection illustrates the importance of expanding the experience of Cultural Studies beyond its established spheres of national investigation, while it also speaks to the necessity to re-evaluate the hegemony of the English-language academic and cultural production on the global scale. The collection offers insights into the gamut of cultural practices and institutional environments in which Russian cultural production happens today. It shows how cultural industries and institutions in Russia are integrated into the global marketplace and transnational communities, while they also draw on and contribute to local lives and experiences by trying to create an autonomous space for symbolic production at personal and collective levels. Through diverse topics, the issue sheds light on the agency, i.e. practitioners and participants, creators and consumers, of Russian cultural production and the neoliberal practices implemented on creative work and cultural administration in Russia today. The Introduction outlines the development of academic studies on Russian cultural practices since 1991; describes main political developments shaping the cultural field in Putin’s Russia; and, finally, identifies the Cultural Studies debates the editors of the collection find most productive for investigations of Russia, i.e. the instrumentalization of culture and culture as resource. Relocated in an analysis of a post-socialist society, these conceptualisations seem increasingly problematic in a situation where local and federal policies governing cultural and creative work focus simultaneously on marketization and on nationalism as the main tools of legitimizing the federal government.     

马克思主义生态观与高校生态文明教育

马克思主义生态观是关于人与自然之间辩证关系的总体看法和根本观点,包含着人与自然、人与社会、人与人、人与自我和谐的重要主题,这对我国高校开展生态文明教育具有重要的理论指导。高校生态文明教育应以马克思主义生态观为指导,同时遵循科学性、综合性、实践性、发展性等原则,以确保教育目标实现。     

政府智库与民间智库的合作与交流

政府智库与民间智库合作的制度条件主要包括开放的公共决策体制、共同的决策价值基础和对称的资源依赖结构。构建政府智库与民间智库的合作机制,应从以下方面着力：联合成立研究协会,搭建合作的组织平台;围绕研究主题,发挥合作的政策职能作用;成立智库合作发展基金,建立合作项目资助制度;提升研究质量,建立合作项目绩效的综合评价制度。     

智库产业化发展的基本特征与操作

智库产业化并不是要改变智库的本质属性。而是借鉴生产性部门产业化的生产组织方式和市场化的资源配置方式,通过产业化、市场化的手段,提高智库机构的运作效率。促进我国智库产业化发展．应大力发展各类智库机构,特别是民间智库;制定智库产业发展的总体规划,对不同类型的智库实行分类指导;引入智库产业发展的竞争机制;建立科学的智库产业发展评估指标体系;加强我国智库机构的专业化建设,努力打造龙头型智库机构：完善智库产业发展的社会配套环境,努力构建全国、区域性智库产业网络;搭建学术交流平台,整合学术资源,努力营造智库产业的网络互动氛围;创新人才培养模式,提升研究人员的学术能力,夯实智库产业发展的人力资源基础。     

Changing symbolic and geographical boundaries between penal zones and rural communities in the Russian Federation

The article examines the processes involved in the integration of the USSR's secret places into mainstream rural society in the Russian Federation. Taking the example of one rural district in the Volga-Ural region that has been the site of a large prison complex over a period of ninety years, the article examines how economic changes and local government and penal reforms have eroded the boundary that marked off the penal region from the rural district in which it was located. Using interviews and social surveys conducted among the local population, the article examines the extent to which the opening of the penal sub-region has led to changes in the symbolic boundary between the communities in the rural raion. The article concludes that although new spaces of active government are being produced in rural Russia, these are not necessarily the basis for the emergence of new common identities among the people living in them.     

我国职业技术培训现状及对策研究

我国近年来出现了"用工荒"和大学生"就业难"并存的问题,该问题的解决需要从劳动力的"质"上去突破,要通过职业技术培训来改善我国的人才结构。但是我国目前的"学校-企业-培训机构"三位一体的职业技术培训体系还存在诸多不足,文章将从主体资格、培养方式两个方面提出解决对策。