审美论-语言论-文化论：新时期30年文论发展轨迹

新时期30年来,经过几代学人的共同努力,文学理论迎来了发展的最好时期。这30年文论的发展轨迹可以粗略概括为：从审美论,到语言论,再到文化论。因此,有必要在审美论、语言论和文化论三元兼摄的“文化诗学”路径中,进一步推动文学理论的研究,使它有更好的发展。     

试论邓小平中国特色社会主义理论的历史性贡献

本文从三个方面论述邓小平中国特色社会主义理论的历史性贡献。     

早期中国话剧研究的学术定位及其理论意义

外倾社会心态制约着近代以来的中国戏剧变革最终走向了移植西方话剧的道路。人们对话剧的热情有时并不在话剧本身 ,而在于赋予话剧之外的那层心理色彩 ,在于人们对话剧的热情中把自己的社会心理倾向表达出来了。早期中国话剧研究的成果 ,对认识当代中国文艺的诸种现实多有裨益。话剧传入中国的文化史价值 ,主要不在于它传达了近代中国的意识形态 ,而在于它改变了传统中国戏剧的格局。早期话剧在文化史上不可取代的历史地位 ,恰恰在于它的艺术特征。     

论回汉民族关系的历史特点

本文从类型学的角度,对回汉关系在中华民族关系总体格局中所显示出来的历史特点进行了分析,以期为人们科学评价和准确把握回汉民族关系的现状和未来趋向提供一种背景和参照。作者认为,交错分布的民族居住格局、社会政治生活中的结构性融合、经济生产领域的互补传递性和文化上的求同存异是回汉民族关系的显著历史特点。     

暨南大学南洋文化教育事业部的历史成就与贡献

暨南大学南洋文化教育事业部 (192 7～ 194 9)是一个曾经称誉海内外的华侨研究机构 ,该部担负研究华侨、服务华侨、帮助华侨摆脱危机的特殊使命 ,是当时中国境内研究华侨的唯一机构。本文探讨南洋文化教育事业部成立的时代背景 ,对它在研究华侨、服务华侨 ,推动华侨教育事业发展等方面的历史成就与贡献作出回顾与总结     

邓小平不断推进马克思主义中国化的历史探索与历史贡献

邓小平毕生致力于马克思主义中国化,运用本土化的马克思主义原理带领中国人民探索了中国特色社会主义事业建设的伟大实践,是先锋的马克思主义者。邓小平推进马克思主义中国化的历史探索有三个标志性事件或时期,也是邓小平理论形成的过程,为中国的经济社会建设做出了历史性卓越贡献。     

唯物史观在理解或消解中的命运--“西马”“后马”对唯物史观的认识梳理

唯物史观创立以来,给哲学甚至整个社会科学带来了一场革命,一直吸引着思想家们不断地探索和研究。“西马”早期代表人物能科学地理解唯物史观,甚至能对经典理论进行有益的创新和补充,后期代表人物与唯物史观越走越远。“后马”对唯物史观的态度主要是消解与颠覆,其理论“创新”也基本上与唯物史观相背离。我们必须用坚持和发展的态度、严谨科学的态度,坚持马克思主义的基本理论范式。随着时代的变化,我们也应该对马克思主义唯物史观加以革新和发展。     

The Roman Catholic Church: A Centuries Old History of Awareness of Clerical Child Sexual Abuse (from the First to the 19th Century)

Debates in international forums and in mainstream media on the role, responsibility, liability, and response of ecclesiastical authorities of the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) toward clerical child sexual abuse (cCSA) fail to take into account the historical roots and awareness of the problem. Reports also fail to mention the historic organizational laws RCC developed over centuries. In contrast, RCC documents evidence that the Catholic Church not only carried century’s old history of cCSA, but also repeatedly condemned cCSA by successive papal authorities, organizational laws, and institutional management mechanisms. During the first millennium, however, church laws remained confined to the bookshelves and were not converted into appropriate management policies and infrastructural models. This was largely due to the absence of a central administrative organizational structure, which developed later in the 12th century, following the Second Council of Lateran (1139) when the Papacy asserted its authority to establish administrative control over the organizational church. It was only then that management policies started to be framed and institutional structures enacted to deal more appropriately with cCSA from the 14th to 20th centuries. Despite this, RCC developed a culture of secrecy using clandestine organizational management models and institutional laws prescribed in 1568, 1622, 1741, 1866, 1922, and 1962 which aimed to manage cCSA. The current study traces reported cCSA as far back as the first century and critically examines the organizational laws, and institutional policies developed by RCC to address clerical sexual misconduct up to the end of the 19th century.     

What does wellbeing do? An approach to defamiliarize keywords in youth studies

Wellbeing has become a keyword in youth and social policy, a construct deployed as a measure of a good life. Often associated with physical and mental health, wellbeing encompasses numerous indicators, from subjective experiences of happiness and satisfaction to markers of economic prosperity and basic human needs of security. This article examines wellbeing as an organizing concept in discourses on young people and argues for defamiliarizing its truth claims and cultural authority by investigating what wellbeing does. We begin by examining the rise of wellbeing, drawing attention to its conceptual muddiness and ambiguity. Framed by the Foucauldian notion of problematization, the analysis proceeds along two routes: first, through an historical consideration of wellbeing as a relational concept with antecedents, focusing on ‘self-esteem’; and second, through a reading of wellbeing in contemporary educational policy. Informed by Somers' historical sociology of concept formation and Bacchi's critical policy analysis, we illuminate the mixed dimensions of wellbeing's reach, placing it within longer traditions of youth studies and psy-knowledges and showing its transformative promise as well as its individualizing effects. In doing so, we elaborate a methodological approach that can be adapted to examine other keywords in youth studies and social policy discourse.