加强判决释理与我国法官职业保障体系的构筑

一个国家司法制度的状况,根本上取决于运行这一制度的人,尤其是法官,法官的专业水准和道德素养,在很大程度上决定了司法制度是否公正、有效地运作,决定了判决释理的水平。所以切实提高法官自身素养、加快法官制度改革,是我国现行司法改革的一个重要环节,也是提高裁判说服力和公信力的重要途径。     

Isn’t that why you were hired?

Human service organizations seek bilingual professionals to meet the social and linguistic needs of their increasingly limited English proficient (LEP) clientele. As a result, bilingual professionals often find themselves having to meet overwhelming service delivery expectations. This paper reports on a qualitative study about the work experiences of 27 court employees within a judicial system in the Eastern United States. The study found that bilingual professionals encounter challenges because of their language skills. At the intersection of these challenges are microaggressions that manifest in the judicial system, adversely affecting them professionally and personally.     

论我国建立行政判例制度的必要性

判例法具备很强的灵活性和社会适应力，能够有效弥补成文法的缺陷，在行政法领域表现出明显的优势。从统一法律适用、弥补行政立法的不足和完善司法解释的角度，论证我国建立行政判例制度的必要性。     

Of peasants and publics in colonial India: Daduram's story

ABSTRACT

This article uses an exceptionally well-documented law case from the 1650s to offer a fresh perspective on the English experience of Atlantic settlement during its early years. It argues for the centrality of the Essex county quarter sessions court in the building of neighbourhood on the geographic and cultural margins of the Massachusetts Bay colony. By focusing on the north-eastern margin at Cape Ann, the analysis reveals aspects of state building through a common law judicial process which was just as important, but less readily apparent, in other settings. The article addresses three major historiographic areas, engaging with the historical literature on English neighbourhoods and English adaptation to the American environment, on the significance of witchcraft or maleficium in English societies, and on the nature and meanings of law, law courts and judicial process in the building of communities. Case documents also enable the use of some concepts and techniques of literary analysis related to the study of narrative, arguing that judicial verdicts selected and suppressed aspects of local stories elicited during the course of the investigation in order to craft an account of local neighbourhood that suited a broader cultural narrative of Massachusetts Bay’s political consolidation during the 1650s.     

夫妻共同生活之用意之于不动产物权

我国婚姻法司法解释（三）（征求意见稿）首次尝试在不动产物权流转法律关系中援引夫妻共同生活的理念,此做法值得肯定,但由于未充分认识到该理念的价值而使得征求意见稿不尽完善。事实上,夫妻共同生活之用意不仅可以作为不动产物权归属的判定依据,而且可以作为限制配偶一方擅自处分个人财产的正当理由。     

比较法视野下的人民陪审员制度改革

新一轮司法体制改革在强化职业化主审法官主导地位的同时，提出了完善人民陪审员制度、拓宽人民群众有序参与司法渠道的改革目标。比较日本、韩国的民众参与司法裁判的新制度，可知中、日、韩三国的制度改革虽然目标相近，但制度背景、制度内容及其取得的效果却有较大差异。如何平衡好司法专业性与民众参与之间的关系并确保专业性优先，是当前中国司法改革需要考虑的首要问题。参与审判并非普通民众参与司法活动的唯一形式，应当拓宽人民群众参与司法的形式和渠道，加强顶层设计，重视发挥人民陪审员提供专业知识和参与纠纷调解的作用。在今后的人民陪审制改革中要转换视角，弱化政治意义而强化司法功能，细化相应的程序实体规则，注意考虑司法审判相关主体与参与司法裁判民众之间的关系。     

论社会公民权的保障——以国家义务的适当承担为出发点

社会福利制度与公民权的结合便形成社会公民权。社会公民权之目的是确保一定的福利水平，使公民过上一种“文明化的生活”。而国家一般通过宪法等形式来确认社会公民权。公民与国家在社会公民权方面的争议可通过社会公民权的适当限制、理性的公众参与以及相应的司法救济予以解决。     

试论公安机关行政行为和刑事司法行为的界定

对我国公安机关的两种行为——行政行为与刑事司法行为进行了分析、比较。公安机关在实践中由于滥用刑事司法权 ,导致刑事司法行为和行政行为难以界定 ,这给人民法院的司法实践带来困难。针对这种状况 ,提出了界定我国公安机关的行政行为与刑事司法行为的标准 ,并对最高人民法院《关于执行〈行政诉讼法〉若干问题的解释》中对这一问题的规定作出评析     

论诉讼中的"二元"证明标准

诉讼中的证明标准问题是证据法学研究中的一个重要问题.近年来,一些学者从比较研究的角度提出在我国证据法中移植英美法上的"二元"证明标准.本文在理论和实践两个层次分析的基础上提出反驳理由,并指出,这种移植既无必要性,也缺乏可操作性.     

论诉讼时效开始

我国《民法通则》对诉讼时效的规定过于原则 ,不利于指导司法实践活动 ,应进行研究和修改