网络语境下大学生身心现代化的行为模式和路径选择

人的现代化是一个紧跟时代发展的过程。大学生身心素质现代化必须适应网络技术的特点和要求,有效使用信息技术,提高信息素养;利用网络技术学会学习、学会处理虚拟社会的关系和现实社会关系的冲突;树立圆融意识,正确处理大学校园内的各种文化冲突;树立发展意识,与时俱进,使自己的现代化真正成为一个动态的、具有鲜明时代特性的过程。     

事件指示空间的认知机制及语言形式

用某个空间发生的事件来指示该空间是一种常见的语言表达方式,因为事件都是在空间里展开的,事件指示空间属于凸显特征记忆,符合转喻认知＂接近即同一＂的原则。事件指示空间的语言表现形式可以分为三个阶段：第一是描述式阶段,表现为＂事件（作定语）＋中心语＂语言模式;第二是黏合式阶段,表现为＂事件（作专名）＋通名＂语言模式;第三是转喻式阶段,表现为事件直接作地名模式。     

关于英语语言交际中出现的错误的思考

交际法排斥传统的语法教学,将母语习得的方式套用在英语学习中,是因为忽视了母语的习得依赖于一个司空见惯的语言文化环境。当英语作为第二语言被学习时,第一语言思维方式会更多地干扰成年人。交际中因语用错误而导致的失败比语法错误更加令人难以接受。因此,增强语言能力、培养用英语思维的方式和学习西方文化对有效得体的交际是必要的。     

浅议语言结构、思维模式的哲学渊源及翻译

不同民族思维方式的差异是不同文化深层次的差异,而且与语言表达方式密切相关。对各类语言、文化做内在的、实质性的比较研究,首先应对统治该语言、文化的思想范畴进行比较研究。本文试从英汉两种语言的不同特点入手,从哲学的角度来分析中西思维模式的差异,并探讨翻译中的处理方法。     

菲尔摩语言理论中的框架之辨

菲尔摩(Charles C.Fillmore)在其语言理论中提出了包括格框架、语言框架以及认知框架在内的多个框架概念。通过分析梳理菲尔摩对这些框架概念的论述,并阐明这些框架概念中的不同内涵及特征,发现这些在不同时期提出的框架概念集中反映了菲尔摩语言理论从格语法到框架语义学的发展轨迹。     

英语霸权时代民族语言多样性的保护

由于21世纪经济、技术全球化的推进,英语在全球范围传播和普及。英语的传播与霸权与和全球范围语言濒危现象有密切的关系,是世界语言濒危问题的根本原因。英语的全球化给世界语言多样性的生态样式带来了极大的破坏。因此,应及时采取措施对策,反对英语的霸权,保护世界语言多样性。     

称赞语应答的语体特征分析

称赞语的应答是常用的交际技巧,但是制约应答方式的因素却有很多,要做到应答得体在一定程度上非常困难。本文通过分析称赞语应答的语体特征的构成、对称赞语回应的影响和作用,从中找出称赞语回应的共同特征和应该遵守的潜规则,指导人们如何在交际中得体回应别人的称赞。     

The sociolinguistics of late modern publics

This issue examines struggles over public discursive power in late modern society, understanding that late modern publics are characterized by a destabilization of formerly unmarked public authorities, in other words, an unsettling of standardized “voices from nowhere” (Gal & Woolard, 2001). The contributions to the issue illustrate traditional social and academic elites’ discursive reactions to such developments. In the introduction, we outline different theoretical frameworks of modern and late‐modern publics, identify factors that contribute to a destabilization of modern certainties of social public order, and argue that a weakening of traditional public norms not only implies emancipation but also, as the contributions to the issue demonstrate, may bring along new forms of public dominance. For the positioning of contemporary sociolinguistic theory and practice, we conclude that it is the crucial task of the current public moment to critically self‐engage with our own relations with, and ideologies of, the public. Dieses Themenheft befragt Strukturen öffentlicher Diskursmacht in spätmoderner Gesellschaft und zeigt auf, dass spätmoderne Öffentlichkeit durch eine Destabilisierung von vormals unmarkierten Autoritäten ist, in anderen Worten, von standardisierten “voices from nowhere” (Gal & Woolard, 2001). Die Beiträge illustrieren Reaktionen traditioneller sozialer und akademischer Eliten hierauf. In dieser Einleitung skizzieren wir verschiedene theoretische Zugänge zu moderner und spätmoderner Öffentlichkeit, identifizieren Faktoren, die zu einer Destabilisierung von sozialen Gewissheiten der Moderne beitragen und legen dar, dass eine Schwächung traditioneller öffentlichen Normen nicht nur soziale Emanzipation impliziert sondern, wie die Beiträge zu diesem Heft zeigen, auch neue Formen öffentlicher Dominanz hervorbringt. In Bezug auf zeitgenössische soziolinguistische Theorie und Praxis schlussfolgern wir daraus, dass es im aktuellen öffentlichen Kontext eine zentrale Aufgabe der Soziolinguistik ist, sich kritisch mit den eigenen Beziehungen zu und Ideologien von Öffentlichkeit befassen. Das Themenheft soll zu dieser Auseinandersetzung beitragen.     

Towards a material ethnography of linguistic landscape: Multilingualism,mobility and space in a South African township1

The study of multilingual landscapes promises to introduce a new perspective into theories and policies of multilingualism, and to provide essential data for a politics of language. However, the theorization of space and language underlying the notion of linguistic landscape is not able to capture the manifold complexities of (transnational) multilingual mobility that is characteristic of many late‐modern multilingual societies. Basing our argument on signage data from a contemporary South Africa in a dynamic phase of social transformation, we argue that more refined notions of space coupled to a material ethnography of multilingualism could provide a theoretically more relevant and methodologically refocused notion of (multilingual) linguistic landscape. Specifically, we take an approach to landscapes as semiotic moments in the social circulation of discourses (in multiple languages), and view signs as re‐semiotized, socially invested distributions of multilingual resources, the material, symbolic and interactional artifacts of a sociolinguistics of mobility.     

Linguistic instrumentalism and national language policy in Mainland China’s state print media coverage of the Protecting Cantonese Movement

This article examines the Chinese government’s use of the print media to justify the national language policy and address individuals’ concerns about the vitality of regional varieties of the Chinese language (i.e., Cantonese) in its coverage of the Protecting Cantonese Movement (July 2010) in Guangzhou. The analysis revealed that the Chinese government adopted a relatively reconciliatory response to the Movement, which apparently contested the relevant language policy. However, the media texts maintained the national policy of promoting Putonghua as inviolable, whereas they assigned Cantonese the role of the carrier of cultural tradition and stressed that the rise or fall of particular regional language depended on regional socioeconomic developments. Such media discussions showed that the state carefully managed relevant discussions about the vitality of regional Chinese varieties within the discursive space defined by legalistic, cultural, and socioeconomic development discourses. These discursive boundaries reflect the dominance of linguistic instrumentalism in the Chinese government’s language policymaking.