解析与重构：未注册驰名商标的法律保护

我国《商标法》依据注册与否,分别为注册和未注册驰名商标提供不同的法律保护,这在很大程度上将未注册驰名商标置于更加危险的境地。良好的商业信誉与广为知晓的知名度是所有驰名商标获得特殊保护的根本与基础。因此,我国《商标法》应改变目前以注册决定保护程度的做法,为未注册驰名商标实行跨类保护,赋予商标权和提供多种民事法律救济。     

浅议讼学传播对明清地方司法的潜在挑战

以讼师秘本为主要载体的明清讼学,不仅是我国古代法学的重要分支,而且是民间百姓法律知识形成的重要途径。明清讼学给民众传播他们所需要的法律知识,给他们传授了诉讼技巧,锻炼了他们的诉讼技能,提升了他们的诉讼水平,对封建司法专制制度提出了挑战,大大抑制了地方官吏的武断审判,引起了各级官吏和司法衙门的高度关注和焦虑,在一定程度上促使了地方官吏更加谨慎处理民众的诉讼诉求。     

从盐业契约看民事诉讼模式的转变

在现代民事诉讼制度中,一直存在职权主义诉讼与当事人主义诉讼两种模式之争,而我国的民事诉讼制度可以说基本上属于职权主义模式。在四川井盐生产历史过程中,保留了丰富的盐业契约档案,这些契约规范着各类的盐业生产经营活动,调解着复杂的盐业诉讼纠纷盐业契约以其突出的自由性、合意性以及遵从习惯等特点,在过去有效地调节着复杂的经济关系,我们探析其中有价值的成分,对于思考我国的民事诉讼制度应更多地引入当事人主义模式一定会有所启示。     

英、美、法三国行政诉讼外部调整机制比较

英美法系的典型代表国家英美两国与大陆法系的典型代表国家法国,在寻求和实现公平与效率的价值平衡方面殊途回归。原因在于三国各自逐渐建立起了一套有效平衡行政诉讼价值的调整机制。面对二战后行政扩张及与其相伴的行政纠纷的增加,英、美、法三国形成了包括行政机关自身的机制调整、立法机关的机制调整、非国家机关的监督机制调整等的外部调整机制。     

试论在贿赂案件中引入污点证人豁免制度

取证难已成为我国检察机关办理贿赂案件面临的重大难题,为了取得行受贿双方的供述,侦查人员往往费尽周折,结果却不尽人意,甚至有时还会发生刑讯逼供等违法侦查现象。污点证人豁免制度能够巧妙地利用行受贿双方之间的矛盾,取得供述,从而节约诉讼成本,提高诉讼效率,很好地解决这一问题。     

诉权理论导入我国刑事诉讼体系的必要性

诉权理论导入我国刑事诉讼体系与刑事司法改革的深入息息相关。分析诉权理论导入刑事诉讼的必要性对于建立我国的刑事诉权理论体系有重要的理论意义。从诉讼核心的转变、人权保障的强化和诉讼研究体系的创新等角度来看,在我国现行刑事诉讼制度中导入诉权理论十分必要。     

The impact on taxpayer costs of a jail diversion program for people with serious mental illness

Mental illness is prevalent among those incarcerated. Jail diversion is one means by which people with mental illness are treated in the community – often with some criminal justice system oversight – instead of being incarcerated. Jail diversion may lead to immediate reductions in taxpayer costs because the person is no longer significantly engaged with the criminal justice system. It may also lead to longer term reductions in costs because effective treatment may ameliorate symptoms, reduce the number of future offenses, and thus subsequent arrests and incarceration. This study estimates the impact on taxpayer costs of a model jail diversion program for people with serious mental illness. Administrative data on criminal justice and treatment events were combined with primary and secondary data on the costs of each event. Propensity score methods and a quasi-experimental design were used to compare treatment and criminal justice costs for a group of people who were diverted to a group of people who were not diverted. Diversion was associated with approximately $2800 lower taxpayer costs per person 2 years after the point of diversion (p < .05). Reductions in criminal justice costs drove this result. Jail diversion for people with mental illness may thus be justified fiscally.     

A Realistic Path to Implementing China’s Budget Law

The core issue for the implementation of modern budget law is to optimize the satisfaction of society’s demand for public goods. The form of implementation mechanism that will best achieve this goal has thus become a major topic in the field of legal research. To go beyond the Anglo-Saxon budget model and construct a realistic path for the implementation of China’s budget law, this issue needs to be explored from the perspective of Chinese citizens in a way that safeguards the fundamental interests of the people and is premised on upholding and improving the People’s Congress system, so as to achieve a balance between internal and external budget allocation relationships. There are three routes to implementing China’s budget law: the political, the social, and the judicial. Under the first, citizens’ political identity interests are represented by deputies who oversee the budgetary powers of administrative bodies through the People’s Congress. Under the second, citizens individually or collectively participate, influence or even decide the allocation of public economic resources through dialogue, negotiation, reasoning and argument with the responsible budgetary agency in the course of the budget’s compilation, examination and approval, execution and supervision. Under the third, the establishment of a system for budgetary litigation allows citizens to participate in and supervise the implementation of the budget law, individually or collectively. This provides judicial security for the law’s implementation. These three realistic implementation routes represent the dialectical unity of concerted institutional effort aimed directly at effective implementation of budget law. Judicial interpretations of budget law implementation indicate the importance and urgency of promoting national governance capacity through reform of the legal systems governing finance and taxation. This explains the significant role of finance and taxation law in national governance.     

公共治理中的意识形态供给：一种交易费用分析

公共治理的目的是运用公共权力去引导、规范和控制公众的各种活动，运用公共权威维持政治秩序，实现公共资源配置的最优化与社会福利的最大化，最大限度地增进公共利益。由于公众的经济人理性不完全性，政府不得不投入大量资源和公众博弈，以维持保卫公共系统的存续。意识形态通过其无微不至的“观照”面孔和修辞技艺来形塑和开拓政治格局，说服人们相信社会生活就应该如此，诱发人们对政治系统的信任与偏好。意识形态的供给具有降低交易费用，促进政府和社会公众合作与协调发展的功用。     

高校经济性腐败临界行为及机理研究

教育腐败危及公平和社会公信力，目前，高校腐败已经成为整个社会关注的热点。文章以博弈经济学的视角，分析了高校监督者和高校从业者之间的博弈关系，揭示了高校经济性腐败的临界行为，研究表明，高校从业者临界收益与监督概率、从业者收入、贴现因子及从业者任期正相关，与从业者风险好恶系数负相关，高校监督者临界监督成本与背德未被发现时收益、从业者收入、背德概率、贴现因子及从业者任期正相关，与监督者风险好恶系数负相关，在此基础上，提出应采取选择品德高尚的高校从业者、提高腐败成本、建立有效的监督和激励机制等预防高校腐败的措施。