魏晋南北朝林政初探

魏晋南北朝时期的林业领域取得了一些新的发展，这与当时林政的实施有着密不可分的联系。本文通过对魏晋南北朝时期涉及到林业官职、政策、法令、赋税的相关经营管理措施进行分析，研究和总结了其时林政的一些基本特点以及对林业发展的影响，以期给现代林业管理提供一些借鉴。     

福建森林能源产业的开发和对策

福建是林业大省,生物能源丰富,其开发利用比较早,但近年来发展缓慢。阐述了目前国内外及我省林业生物质能源开发利用现状,分析了我省林业生物质能源开发利用前景,从战略、扶持、研发、能源林基地、部门职能等方面提出了福建发展森林能源产业的对策。     

南阳市林业持续发展探讨

对南阳市林业的发展情况进行了全面分析 ,论证了我市林业发展的优势 ,指出了存在的不足。根据本市的特点 ,对我市发展高效持续林业提出了切实可行的措施     

关于中国林业经济管理学科起源的探讨

学科发展历史的研究对于学科建设具有重要的推动作用。以追溯林业经济管理学科的核心课程为线索，研究了中国林业经济管理教育早期的发展脉络，探讨了学科的起源。认为该学科起源于1915年北京农业专门学校开设的林政学等课程，较目前的观点提早了30余年。     

多功能林业系统协同发展机理分析

应用协同学的基本理论,对林业的生态、经济、社会子系统的协同方式及其运行机制进行分析,提出了多功能林业的系统协同度计量方法。在目前的多功能林业系统中,大多数为某两个子系统间的协同状态。将子系统间的协同效应强弱用不同值域区间表示,并将多功能林业系统划分为不同类型的协同形态。多功能林业系统发展的理想状态应该是一种相对稳定的高效协同发展状态。这种协同状态主要由系统中各子系统的自组织功能和系统整体长期的演化及动态发展形成。     

国有林区非公有制林业运行机制研究

非公有制林业的作用日益显现,黑龙江省国有林区的非公有制林业也获得了长足的发展。按照经济运行机制,国有林区非公有制林业要在运行主体、运行目标和运行环境上协调一致,同步发展。但是,非公有制林业的运行还存在运行环境上的一些体制性障碍,需要在改革林地使用制度、税费减免、完善活立木市场、改革林业投资政策、制定落实鼓励措施和加强林业文化建设等方面,采取有效措施予以破解。     

江苏平原林权制度改革思考

本文根据江苏省林业分布的情况，从农田林网的生态公益林建设、大力发展城市林业、加强村庄绿化建设等方面探讨了进一步深化林权制度改革，建设绿色江苏的改革途径。     

森林碳汇预算体系设计及应用研究

文章结合营林企业森林碳汇生产经营的特征,尝试设计包含碳汇量子预算、碳汇支出子预算和碳汇收益子预算等三大子预算的森林碳汇预算体系,并通过丰宁千松坝林场碳汇造林项目作为案例对其进行了具体应用。研究结果表明：对于营林企业的碳汇造林项目来说,森林碳汇预算体系应以预测碳汇量、含CCER申请活动和造林活动在内的生产经营活动、在市场上进行碳汇减排量交易等活动为基础,设计碳汇量子预算、碳汇支出子预算和碳汇收益子预算等三个子预算,并以此控制森林碳汇成本,合理分配企业资源。此外,森林碳汇预算应嵌入到传统全面预算体系中,并与现金预算、业务预算和资本预算共同构成全面预算管理体系,从而更好地发挥碳汇预算对企业森林碳汇管理的作用,实现企业的低碳转型和绿色高质量发展。     

More than just trees: Assessing reforestation success in tropical developing countries

Rural communities in many parts of the tropics are dependent of forests for their livelihoods and for environmental services. Forest resources in the tropics have declined rapidly over the past century and therefore many developing countries in the tropics have reforestation programs. Although reforestation is a long-term process with long-term benefits, existing evaluations of the success of these programs tends to focus on short-term establishment success indicators. This paper presents a review of reforestation assessment that highlights the need to not only consider short-term establishment success, but also longer-term growth and maturation success, environmental success and socio-economic success. In addition, we argue that reforestation assessment should not be based on success indicators alone, but should incorporate the drivers of success, which encompasses an array of biophysical, socio-economic, institutional and project characteristics. This is needed in order to understand the reasons why reforestation projects succeed or fail and therefore to design more successful projects in future. The paper presents a conceptual model for reforestation success assessment that links key groups of success indicators and drivers. This conceptual model provides the basis for a more comprehensive evaluation of reforestation success and the basis for the development of predictive systems-based assessment models. These models will be needed to better guide reforestation project planning and policy design and therefore assist rural communities in tropical developing countries to alleviate poverty and achieve a better quality of life.     

Private woodland owners’ perspectives on multifunctionality in English woodlands

Increasing emphasis is being placed in forest policies to deliver public goods such as biodiversity, recreation, landscape and carbon sequestration, alongside timber production. In light of this, it is important to understand how woodland owners themselves perceive their role in delivering these multiple benefits. With up to 80% of woodland in some areas in England in private ownership, and with an increasing number of owners with non-financial objectives for their woodland, the private sector may offer opportunities for delivering public goods. The purpose of this study was to investigate the perceptions and attitudes of private woodland owners to multifunctional woodland management in three study areas in England: Cornwall, the Lake District and the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). Q Methodology was used to identify four perspectives of woodland ownership and management, which can be described as: the Hobby Conservationist; the Individualist; the Custodian and the Multifunctional Owner. The implications of the findings for forest policy are discussed.