陕西高校大学生思想道德现状分析

从陕西高校大学生的基本政治态度、核心价值观念、学习动力指向、校园文明表现、社会行为表现等五个方面来看,陕西高校大学生,在思想道德方面主流是好的,思想觉悟较高。但是,也存在一小部分大学生觉悟和素质表现欠缺的问题,大学生思想道德状况关乎国家未来和发展,高校应高度重视并采取针对性措施,加强大学生思想道德建设工作。     

自媒体内容盈利模式的伦理审视

当前,自媒体的商业化运作已成为常态,自媒体内容盈利模式因其内容产品所带有的文化属性和意识形态特征而受到人们的广泛关注,然而,在利用内容获取盈利的过程中频频出现一系列道德问题。对自媒体内容盈利模式进行伦理审视发现,公民道德素质的提升是解决问题的内在逻辑。因此,可从公民意识的强化和公民人格的完善两个层面入手,探寻完善自媒体内容盈利模式的伦理途径,即增强权利意识,守住自媒体的三道防线;强化平等意识,明确自身定位;增强准则意识,培养和提升自律能力;树立正确的理想信念,为自媒体发展指引方向。     

数字资本主义在数字健康领域对公共利益价值内涵的重构

近年来,所有主要的大型消费科技公司都进入了健康研究领域。这种谷歌式数字健康引出一个问题,即在研究中,公共利益如何得以维系?只有将谷歌式数字健康置于数字资本主义的政治经济中,才能更好地突出公共利益和公共价值问题。以往的研究通常把谷歌式数字健康框定在一个双重的、不可通约的分析逻辑中,其中：私人利益与公共利益是对立的,经济价值与社会价值是对立的。虽然有助于揭示数字资本主义的剥削潜力,但是这种分析逻辑是有缺陷的,因为它只承认关于公共利益的一种理解。通过借鉴博尔坦斯基和泰弗诺的价值理论分析框架,可以发现：谷歌式数字健康对公共利益的价值内涵进行了多重塑造,不仅包括公民价值(为社会做好事),还包括市场价值(创造更多财富)、工业价值(提高生产效率)和项目价值(创新和实验)以及活力价值(促进生命健康)。如果把治理方案看作是一系列价值准则的组合,那么就可以设计出实现和保障公共利益的治理方案。基于此,提出研究进路：探索和构建更丰富的体现公共利益的价值准则体系,对其进行批判性评估,最终制定出能确保“公民”价值的可行治理方案。     

公正的网络道德审判是否可能?——基于旁观者视角

网络道德审判是对传统道德审判的继承与发展,存在着显著的伦理困境：它理应通过激发正向羞耻感来促进对行为者的伦理教化,但在诸多情况中却因引发负向羞耻感而产生对行为者的伦理排斥。网络道德审判作为一种典型的道德评价形态,可以利用情感主义伦理学中的旁观者视角来加以考察。据此可发现,网络旁观者的同情、想象、事实判断能力存在着诸多困境,同时其群体性特征又进一步加剧了潜在的风险。实现公正的网络道德审判,需要汲取和借鉴“公正的旁观者”的多重意蕴来构建可能的伦理进路。     

中华传统美德故事融入幼儿养成教育：内涵、价值与路径

中华优秀传统美德故事是开展幼儿养成教育的优质教育资源,将其融入幼儿养成教育蕴含的重要价值包括心理习惯养成、行为习惯养成和家国情怀养成。当前,传统美德故事融入幼儿养成教育面临着教师内生动力缺失造成的主观困境、家庭育人理念错位造成的现实困境、幼儿园和社会等外部推力不足造成的客观困境。对此,教师层面可以学思并重,加强相关知识学习;理实并进,提升相关专业能力;知行并修,开展主题实践活动;家庭层面可以观念重塑,树立德智并重教育观念;价值重拾,重视家庭美德教育价值;模式重构,构建家园深度互动机制;幼儿园与社会层面可以责任共担,明确幼儿养成教育目标责任体系;成效共评,健全幼儿养成教育综合评价体系;多方共育,扩大幼儿养成教育社会主体参与度。     

基于动态人性观视域的孟子人性论再阐释

孟子以性善为人性本质,同时,人性的生成中也潜存着后天习性面向。基于动态人性观的视域,考察孟子人性论发展的一种可能;在人性立论层面,孟子人性论并非现成的、固定的,而是动态的、生成的;在人性面向层面,孟子人性论潜存着后天习性,由于后天习性的介入,人性面向也由应然转向实然;在主体工夫层面,孟子提出“思诚”联结“诚”与“思”直接面向后天习性,将道德意识转化为道德实践,开显主体的切实道德践履。同时,这一过程也即是孟子人性论的生成与完成,其潜存面向也为孟子人性论的发展提供了新的视域。     

Figures of youth: on the very object of Youth Studies

ABSTRACT

‘Youth’ as a social category is used and abused in all manner of ways across an array of fields, platforms, discourses and spaces, Youth Studies notwithstanding. When we talk about ‘young people’ sometimes we seem to be referring to different phenomena, depending upon our political interests, theoretical perspectives and research methods. This article interrogates how the concept of ‘youth’ is figuratively put to work. By suggesting different figures of youth, and inviting suggestions for more, I propose that tracing how they are situated in different ontological spaces can develop a clearer conception of our research object(s) and help reduce confusion and the possibility that we are talking past each other. The incomplete picture I want to paint of figures of youth, in quite broad-brush strokes, all inter-relate in something of a feedback loop, a material-semiotic assemblage that forms powerful affects for the ways that ‘youth’ is brought into being, how youth are researched, governed, co-opted and exploited.     

道德合理性证明意味着什么?

道德合理性证明问题是当代西方伦理学关注的一个中心问题。这个问题关涉理性与合理性的区分,反映出西方理性观的变化。基础主义证明方法在道德合理性证明问题上已经缺乏说服力。在当代西方伦理学中,道德合理性证明的两种主要方法是叙事和道德论证。叙事和道德论证之间的紧张关系制约着当代西方伦理学的可能发展方向。     

Moral pride only under the positive gaze of others? Effects of praise and criticism on moral pride and guilt / ¿Orgullo moral solo bajo la mirada positiva de los otros? Los efectos del elogio y la crítica sobre el orgullo moral y la culpa

Abstract

This study analysed the influence of praise and criticism on moral pride (the pride we feel when we believe we have done something morally good) and guilt. Ninety-two adolescents (age: M = 15.17, SD = 0.43; 44.6% girls, 55.4% boys) completed a questionnaire which outlined 10 scenarios based on combinations of three variables: the moral nature of the action (positive/negative); praise, criticism or the absence of either; and the source (parents/peers). Participants were asked to indicate the intensity with which they would feel pride and guilt (seven-point scale). Praise of positive actions increased pride. Interestingly, criticism of positive actions reduced pride and increased guilt, while praise of negative actions reduced guilt and increased pride. No differences were found between the pride felt after a criticized positive action and that felt after a praised negative action. A parallel effect was not, however, observed for guilt. These results reveal the strong, sometimes pernicious, influence of praise and criticism on guilt and pride and, even more, the need for praise by others in the experience of moral pride.     

Children’s reasoning about unequal gender‐based distributions

Children ages 7 (N = 56, M_age = 7.24, SD = 0.83), 9 (N = 55, M_age = 9.25, SD = 0.52), and 11 (N = 52, M_age = 11.60, SD = 0.79), and emerging adults (N = 50, M_age = 20.76, SD = 0.87) judged distributions of different items to boys and girls, when the items distributed varied by gender valence (related or unrelated to gender norms) and equivalency (equivalent or unequal). Distributions were judged to be acceptable most when the items were consistent with gender norms, especially for participants at ages 7 and 9, indicating that in middle childhood, children judge unequal treatment as fair when it is related to gender norms. Items were judged to be more likable when they were gendered, and likability judgments predicted more positive evaluations of the distributions, even when controlling for age.