Bayesian estimation of sensitivity level and population proportion of a sensitive characteristic in a binary optional unrelated question RRT model

Sihm et al. (2016 Sihm, J. S., A. Chhabra, and S. N. Gupta. 2016. An optional unrelated question RRT model. Involve: A Journal of Mathematics 9 (2):195–209.[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) proposed an unrelated question binary optional randomized response technique (RRT) model for estimating the proportion of population that possess a sensitive characteristic and the sensitivity level of the question. In our work, decision theoretic approach has been followed to obtain Bayes estimates of the two parameters along with their corresponding minimal Bayes posterior expected losses (BPEL) using beta prior and squared error loss function (SELF). Relative losses are also examined to compare the performances of the Bayes estimates with those of the classical estimates obtained by Sihm et al. (2016 Sihm, J. S., A. Chhabra, and S. N. Gupta. 2016. An optional unrelated question RRT model. Involve: A Journal of Mathematics 9 (2):195–209.[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]). The results obtained are illustrated with the help of real survey data using non informative prior.     

A note on fiducial model averaging as an alternative to checking Bayesian and frequentist models

Just as frequentist hypothesis tests have been developed to check model assumptions, prior predictive p-values and other Bayesian p-values check prior distributions as well as other model assumptions. These model checks not only suffer from the usual threshold dependence of p-values, but also from the suppression of model uncertainty in subsequent inference. One solution is to transform Bayesian and frequentist p-values for model assessment into a fiducial distribution across the models. Averaging the Bayesian or frequentist posterior distributions with respect to the fiducial distribution can reproduce results from Bayesian model averaging or classical fiducial inference.     

A Bayesian algorithm for sample size determination for equivalence and non-inferiority test

Bayesian sample size estimation for equivalence and non-inferiority tests for diagnostic methods is considered. The goal of the study is to test whether a new screening test of interest is equivalent to, or not inferior to the reference test, which may or may not be a gold standard. Sample sizes are chosen by the model performance criteria of average posterior variance, length and coverage probability. In the absence of a gold standard, sample sizes are evaluated by the ratio of marginal probabilities of the two screening tests; whereas in the presence of gold standard, sample sizes are evaluated by the measures of sensitivity and specificity.     

基于改进语言评估标度的专家后验权重确定方法研究

针对大型复杂项目的高度不确定性,专家评价的模糊性和差异性等特点,本文给出了一种实用的语言评估新标度,并提出了不确定扩展语言信息的概念。利用改进的语言评估标度分别探讨确定语言信息、不确定语言信息及不确定扩展语言信息下的专家后验权重的确定方法,认为前两者均为后者的特殊表现形式。最后用型号项目风险评价实例证明了方法的科学有效性以及评价结果的合理性。     

Bayesian confidence intervals for means and variances of lognormal and bivariate lognormal distributions

The lognormal distribution is currently used extensively to describe the distribution of positive random variables. This is especially the case with data pertaining to occupational health and other biological data. One particular application of the data is statistical inference with regards to the mean of the data. Other authors, namely Zou et al. (2009), have proposed procedures involving the so-called “method of variance estimates recovery” (MOVER), while an alternative approach based on simulation is the so-called generalized confidence interval, discussed by Krishnamoorthy and Mathew (2003). In this paper we compare the performance of the MOVER-based confidence interval estimates and the generalized confidence interval procedure to coverage of credibility intervals obtained using Bayesian methodology using a variety of different prior distributions to estimate the appropriateness of each. An extensive simulation study is conducted to evaluate the coverage accuracy and interval width of the proposed methods. For the Bayesian approach both the equal-tail and highest posterior density (HPD) credibility intervals are presented. Various prior distributions (Independence Jeffreys' prior, Jeffreys'-Rule prior, namely, the square root of the determinant of the Fisher Information matrix, reference and probability-matching priors) are evaluated and compared to determine which give the best coverage with the most efficient interval width. The simulation studies show that the constructed Bayesian confidence intervals have satisfying coverage probabilities and in some cases outperform the MOVER and generalized confidence interval results. The Bayesian inference procedures (hypothesis tests and confidence intervals) are also extended to the difference between two lognormal means as well as to the case of zero-valued observations and confidence intervals for the lognormal variance. In the last section of this paper the bivariate lognormal distribution is discussed and Bayesian confidence intervals are obtained for the difference between two correlated lognormal means as well as for the ratio of lognormal variances, using nine different priors.     

Dropping observations without affecting posterior and predictive distributions

Suppose in a distribution problem, the sample information W is split into two pieces W ₁ and W ₂, and the parameters involved are split into two sets, π containing the parameters of interest, and θ containing nuisance parameters. It is shown that, under certain conditions, the posterior distribution of π does not depend on the data W ₂, which can thus be ignored. This also has consequences for the predictive distribution of future (or missing) observations. In fact, under similar conditions, the predictive distributions using W or just W ₁ are identical.     

Bayesian inference for the randomly censored Burr-type XII distribution

The article presents the Bayesian inference for the parameters of randomly censored Burr-type XII distribution with proportional hazards. The joint conjugate prior of the proposed model parameters does not exist; we consider two different systems of priors for Bayesian estimation. The explicit forms of the Bayes estimators are not possible; we use Lindley's method to obtain the Bayes estimates. However, it is not possible to obtain the Bayesian credible intervals with Lindley's method; we suggest the Gibbs sampling procedure for this purpose. Numerical experiments are performed to check the properties of the different estimators. The proposed methodology is applied to a real-life data for illustrative purposes. The Bayes estimators are compared with the Maximum likelihood estimators via numerical experiments and real data analysis. The model is validated using posterior predictive simulation in order to ascertain its appropriateness.     

Bayesian and robust Bayesian analysis in a general setting

In this paper we introduce a broad family of loss functions based on the concept of Bregman divergence. We deal with both Bayesian estimation and prediction problems and show that all Bayes solutions associated with loss functions belonging to the introduced family of losses satisfy the same equation. We further concentrate on the concept of robust Bayesian analysis and provide one equation that explicitly leads to robust Bayes solutions. The results are model-free and include many existing results in Bayesian and robust Bayesian contexts in the literature.     

On estimation of R=P(Y<X) for exponential distribution under progressive type-II censoring

This paper deals with the estimation of the stress–strength parameter R=P(Y<X), when X and Y are independent exponential random variables, and the data obtained from both distributions are progressively type-II censored. The uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator and the maximum-likelihood estimator (MLE) are obtained for the stress–strength parameter. Based on the exact distribution of the MLE of R, an exact confidence interval of R has been obtained. Bayes estimate of R and the associated credible interval are also obtained under the assumption of independent inverse gamma priors. An extensive computer simulation is used to compare the performances of the proposed estimators. One data analysis has been performed for illustrative purpose.     

A Bayesian inference of P(λ1<λ2) for two Poisson parameters

The statistical inference drawn from the difference between two independent Poisson parameters is often discussed in the medical literature. However, such discussions are usually based on the frequentist viewpoint rather than the Bayesian viewpoint. Here, we propose an index θ=P(λ_{1, post}<λ_{2, post}), where λ_{1, post} and λ_{2, post} denote Poisson parameters following posterior density. We provide an exact and an approximate expression for calculating θ using the conjugate gamma prior and compare the probabilities obtained using the approximate and the exact expressions. Moreover, we also show a relation between θ and the p-value. We also highlight the significance of θ by applying it to the result of actual clinical trials. Our findings suggest that θ may provide useful information in a clinical trial.