建构马克思的实践唯物主义哲学体系

本文试图对如何建构马克思的实践唯物主义的逻辑体系提供一种设想:在把实践理解为人的自由自觉生命活动的前提下,首先确立实践唯物主义的感性活动的基础,把它的出发点放到"有生命的个人"上来;其次进入到这些个人的关系即社会历史领域,这是实践唯物主义的原理部分;最后是方法部分即唯物辩证法,不论是历史辩证法还是自然辩证法都是逻辑和历史相一致的人学辩证法。     

实践哲学视野中的经济学与经济哲学

经济哲学是经济学与哲学的交叉学科,实践哲学与经济哲学具有本质联系,马克思第一次使经济学有了哲学的含义,使经济哲学深入到哲学的基础中.经济哲学对人的本质的一个特殊方面作出独特的探讨,统一了规范性与描述性,超出了政治经济学的范畴.经济学本身的发展代表了哲学向实践、文化和生活世界的转型.经济哲学的产生也来自于现实问题的要求.     

Black lives matter,capital, and ideology: Spiraling out from India

Piketty's propositions for arresting inequality are discussed through the lens of racism/casteism. We focus on the case of India's George Floyds—the persistence of caste and tribe oppression under economic growth in India—through the insights of our long‐term ethnographic research. We show that inequalities are intimately tied to dynamics of capitalist accumulation in which racial/ethnic/caste/tribe and gender difference is crucial. We argue for an analysis that truly integrates ideology and the dynamics of political economy. The wider implications, we argue are political; they lie in the question of what is to be done. Despite his ambitions to decenter economics, Piketty remains trapped in the logic of economics for what he proposes are essentially economic reforms within capitalism. Moreover, ideological change cannot be a matter of choice only, and cannot be challenged solely at the level of ideas around economic inequality. It will also have to be fought as a direct contest of oppressive ideologies such as racism, casteism, and patriarchy, leading to new counter‐hegemonic positions. We will argue that this takes us from a global history of ideology to a global anthropology of praxis. A first step is to genuinely center conversations with disciplines like anthropology, sociology, and subaltern history studying people and voices from below and from the margins, and the perspectives of scholars and activists from below and from the margins.     

依中国文化精神建设当代国学

"当代国学"与"近代国学"有别.近代国学之研究,起自中学与西学之对比以及依西学之目标重理国故,其意义主要在近代中国革命的意识形态方面.当代国学则缘于西学根本局限性之发现以及中国文化生命之复兴的需要.中国文化精神与西方文化精神的区别在于:一为"实践感性",一为"实践理性".明此区分,是建设中国学问之当代构架的出发点.当代国学之建设自有当代中国民众的生命实践作为基础,但需以历史唯物主义的感性意识异化原理作启发,兼引当代西方存在论革命之思想,才能一方面从根本上诊治中国传统文化之痼疾,另一方面为当代中国立心、立命.     

Towards a critical theory of communication as renewal and update of Marxist humanism in the age of digital capitalism

This paper's task is to outline some foundations of a critical, Marxist-humanist theory of communication in the age of digital capitalism. It theorises the role of communication in society, communication and alienation, communication in social struggles, social struggles for democratic communication, the contradictions of digital capitalism, and struggles for digital socialist humanism. Marxist humanism is a counter-narrative, counter-theory, and counter-politics to neoliberalism, new authoritarianism, and postmodernism. A critical theory of communication can should draw on this intellectual tradition. Communication and work stand in a dialectical relationship. Communication mediates, organises and is the process of the production of sociality and therefore of the reproduction of society. Society and communication are in class and capitalist societies shaped by the antagonism between instrumental and co-operative reason. Authoritarianism and humanism are two basic, antagonistic modes of organisation of society and communication. Instrumental reason creates and universalises alienation. Digital capitalism is a dimension of contemporary society where digital technologies such as the computer, the Internet, the mobile phone, tablets, robots, and AI-driven (“smart”) technologies mediate the accumulation of capital, influence, and reputation. A Marxist-humanist theory of communication aims to inform struggles for a good, commons-based, public Internet in a good, commons-based society that has a vivid, democratic public sphere.     

马克思主义哲学的本体论不是“实践本体论”

我国哲学界对于本体论问题的误解可以说是普遍性的。想当然的认为本体论就是关于本体的学问。"实践本体论"就是基于以上观点,同时借助实践范畴在人化世界的功能性作用,认为马克思主义哲学的本体论就是"实践本体论"。本文针对这种对本体论问题望文生义的理解,将尝试着从本体与本体论,以及经典著作文本出发,来澄清本体论的画像,提供一个共同的本体论话语境域。并将对于"实践本体论"所走入的误区予以剖析,认为马克思主义哲学的本体论只能是物质本体论,不可能是"实践本体论"。     

劳动与实践——略论马克思哲学中"实践"之新义

“实践”概念不仅是马克思哲学之核心概念 ,而且与 2 0世纪西方哲学之发展有着密切的关连 ,因而探讨马克思的“实践”概念就有着深刻的意义。从“劳动”与“实践”两个概念在历史发展中的关系入手来考察 ,马克思哲学的独特之处在于发现了传统处于对执状态的劳动与实践概念之内在关连 ,并将劳动引入实践概念 ,由此而带来了实践概念之融入现实生活的深刻变革     

马克思“实践本体论”的确立及其阐释

马克思对“实践”的理解有一个由抽象到具体的日趋成熟的认识过程,最终确立本体论意义上的实践观。这种观点认为:人的“实践”既具有能动性,又拥有客观性,是历史主体的人与历史客体的环境赖以存在的本体论基础。为了正确理解马克思的“实践”概念,有必要将它与过于强调内在超越的意识哲学或思辨哲学以及过于强调外在客体的经验主义等区分开来。     

Media and information praxis of young activists in the Umbrella Movement

Young people were key participants in the Umbrella Movement in Hong Kong and the media also played an important role in this protest. This study examines how Hong Kong’s young activists developed communication strategies and media practices to mobilize this social movement. A framework termed “media and information praxis of social movements” is proposed for the analysis. The findings showed that in their praxis, the young activists used their media and information literacy skills to initiate, organize, and mobilize collective actions. They not only used social media and mobile networks but also traditional mass media and street booths in a holistic and integrated approach to receive and disseminate information. Hence, these young activists served as agents of mediatization. The results also indicated that the young activists moved away from the traditional movement mode which just tried to motivate a large number of people to protest in the streets. They actively engaged in the new movement mode, which emphasizes the media and information power game. Their praxis in the Umbrella Movement reflects the trend toward the mediatization of social movements in Hong Kong.