股票市场系统流动性风险溢价牛熊市差异研究

从行业和市场行情变化出发研究了股票市场系统流动性风险溢价的差异。以沪深300指数和沪深300行业指数为对象,选取的样本期间横跨牛市行情和熊市行情,采用二元均值GARCH（1,1）——Diagonal BEKK模型进行实证检验。结果表明,在混合市场行情下,总体样本和行业样本的系统流动性风险溢价都不显著,在牛市行情下,不存在系统流动性风险,而在熊市行情下,系统流动性风险显著存在,并且不同行业的系统流动性风险溢价存在一定的差异。     

The Value of a Statistical Life and the Coefficient of Relative Risk Aversion

Individuals’ risk preferences are estimated and employed in a variety of settings, notably including choices in financial, labor, and product markets. Recent work, especially in financial economics, provides estimates of individuals’ coefficients of relative risk aversion (R’s) in excess of one, and often significantly higher. However, it can be shown that high R’s imply equally high values for the income elasticity of the value of a statistical life. Yet estimates of this elasticity, derived from labor and product markets, are in the range of 0.5 to 0.6. Furthermore, it turns out that even an R below one is difficult to reconcile with these elasticity estimates. Thus, there appears to be an important (additional) anomaly involving individuals’ risk-taking behavior in different market settings.JEL Classification: D80, G11, G12, I10, J17     

Flexibility,endogenous risk,and the protection premium

We introduce two types of protection premia. The unconstrained protection premium, ^u, is the individual's willingness to pay for certain protection efficiency given flexibility to adjust optimally the investment in protection. The constrained protection premium, ^c, measures willingness to pay for certain protection efficiency given no flexibility to adjust the investment in protection. ^u depends on tastes and wealth as well as protection technology whereas ^c depends only on technology. We show that ^c cannot exceed ^u and develop necessary conditions for ^c=^u. Optimal protection for an individual with decision flexibility may be larger or smaller than that desired under no flexibility.Journal Paper No. J-15504 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa. Project No. 3048.     

Restrictions on Risk Prices in Dynamic Term Structure Models

Restrictions on the risk-pricing in dynamic term structure models (DTSMs) tighten the link between cross-sectional and time-series variation of interest rates, and make absence of arbitrage useful for inference about expectations. This article presents a new econometric framework for estimation of affine Gaussian DTSMs under restrictions on risk prices, which addresses the issues of a large model space and of model uncertainty using a Bayesian approach. A simulation study demonstrates the good performance of the proposed method. Data for U.S. Treasury yields calls for tight restrictions on risk pricing: only level risk is priced, and only changes in the slope affect term premia. Incorporating the restrictions changes the model-implied short-rate expectations and term premia. Interest rate persistence is higher than in a maximally flexible model, hence expectations of future short rates are more variable—restrictions on risk prices help resolve the puzzle of implausibly stable short-rate expectations in this literature. Consistent with survey evidence and conventional macro wisdom, restricted models attribute a large share of the secular decline in long-term interest rates to expectations of future nominal short rates. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.     

Dread and Risk Elimination Premium for the Value of a Statistical Life

The value of a statistical life (VSL) is a widely used measure for the value of mortality risk reduction. As VSL should reflect preferences and attitudes to risk, there are reasons to believe that it varies depending on the type of risk involved. It has been argued that cancer should be considered a “dread disease,” which supports the use of a “cancer premium.” The objective of this study is to investigate the existence of a cancer premium (for pancreatic cancer and multiple myeloma) in relation to road traffic accidents, sudden cardiac arrest, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Data were collected from 500 individuals in the Swedish general population of 50–74‐year olds using a web‐based questionnaire. Preferences were elicited using the contingent valuation method, and a split‐sample design was applied to test scale sensitivity. VSL differs significantly between contexts, being highest for ALS and lowest for road traffic accidents. A premium (92–113%) for cancer was found in relation to road traffic accidents. The premium was higher for cancer with a shorter time from diagnosis to death. A premium was also found for sudden cardiac arrest (73%) and ALS (118%) in relation to road traffic accidents. Eliminating risk was associated with a premium of around 20%. This study provides additional evidence that there exist a dread premium and risk elimination premium. These factors should be considered when searching for an appropriate value for economic evaluation and health technology assessment.     

Optimal investment and premium control for insurers with ambiguity

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the optimal investment and premium control problem for insurers who worry about model ambiguity. Different from previous works, we assume that the insurer’s surplus process is described by a non-homogeneous compound Poisson model and the insurer has ambiguity on both the financial market and the insurance market. Our purpose is to find the impacts of model ambiguity on optimal policies. With the objective of maximizing the expected utility of terminal wealth, the closed-form solutions of the optimal investment and premium policies are obtained by solving HJB equations. Finally, numerical examples are also given to illustrate the results.     

The Credibility Estimator with General Dependence Structure Over Risks

In almost all credibility models considered previously, the claims are assumed to be independent over risks. However, from the practical point of view, it is not always the case, and hence, in this article, we investigate the credibility premiums when risks are allowed to be generally dependent. Firstly, we re-build the credibility estimators for Bühlmann and Bühlmann–Straub credibility models under general dependence structure over risks. The methods are then extended to the regression credibility models.     

基于马尔可夫转换模型的违约风险溢价预测研究

针对违约风险溢价变化依赖于经济波动状态以及市场、宏观经济变量依赖于经济周期时变因素的阶段,基于马尔可夫转换阶段的具体特征,构建马尔可夫违约风险溢价预测转换模型,并以香港恒生指数信用违约互换波动为例,测算因时变系数波动的指数息差、宏观经济变量等概率,通过实证算例剖析股市、宏观经济变量与违约风险溢价之间的内在联动关系和信用违约风险溢价变化的转换机制,以期实现对违约风险溢价能够进行有效预测,实证仿真结果说明了模型的有效性。     

Correcting Estimation Bias in Dynamic Term Structure Models

The affine dynamic term structure model (DTSM) is the canonical empirical finance representation of the yield curve. However, the possibility that DTSM estimates may be distorted by small-sample bias has been largely ignored. We show that conventional estimates of DTSM coefficients are indeed severely biased, and this bias results in misleading estimates of expected future short-term interest rates and of long-maturity term premia. We provide a variety of bias-corrected estimates of affine DTSMs, for both maximally flexible and overidentified specifications. Our estimates imply interest rate expectations and term premia that are more plausible from a macrofinance perspective. This article has supplementary material online.