许霆案之法学反思

“许霆案”是一个由民事行为转化为犯罪行为的典型案件,根据我国现行《刑法》的规定,比之于法院判决“盗窃罪”的定性,其定性为“侵占罪”更为合适。“许霆案”的启示是,刑法既不能冤枉一个无辜者,也不能放纵一个犯罪人;而且,应罪刑相适,罪轻则刑轻,罪重则刑重。这是现代社会刑法理念下普通公民、立法者、司法者应该追求的法律公正。     

浅析我国不当得利制度与美国unjust enrichment制度之异同

对我国的不当得利制度与美国unjust enrichment制度,从范围和构成要件进行对比,并就我国不当得利制度、无因管理制度和侵权制度与unjust enrichment制度的差异予以分析,试图以此找到完善我国不当得利制度的途径,使其最大限度发挥应有的作用。     

论教育乱收费的危害及治理对策

教育收费是一个涉及千家万户基本利益的问题,同时也是一个关乎国家教育事业能否健康发展的问题.教育乱收费的危害是多方面的,这已成为近年来我国社会各方面反响强烈的热点问题;针对这些问题加强治理,逐渐形成合理而规范的教育收费,有利于形成教育信誉,有利于受教育者良好品德的形成,有利于教育事业的可持续发展.     

获利返还请求权基础探讨--《侵权责任法》第20条之解构与重构

《侵权责任法》第20条并非某一单纯的请求权基础,而是将侵权损害赔偿和获利返还请求权杂糅规定在同一条文之中。获利返还请求权融合了侵权损害赔偿责任违法性与过错的归责要件和不当得利的法律效果,构成新的独立的请求权类型。未来立法中应当将获利返还请求权单独作统一规定。     

The prospective effects of work–family conflict and enrichment on job exhaustion and turnover intentions: comparing long-term temporary vs. permanent workers across three waves

This study investigated work–family conflict (WFC) and enrichment (WFE) in relation to job exhaustion and turnover intentions among long-term temporary (n = 384) and permanent (n = 430) workers. We used three-wave data collected among Finnish university employees in 3 consecutive years. The participants were either permanently or temporarily employed for the whole 3-year period. The results showed that permanent employees reported both higher WFC and WFE during the follow-ups than temporary employees. Temporary workers reported higher job exhaustion and turnover intentions compared to permanent workers. Job contract functioned as a moderator: high WFC showed a prospective effect on increased turnover intentions in permanent employees. In contrast, temporary employees benefited more from high WFE, which showed a prospective effect on reduced job exhaustion in temporary employees. The results suggest that measures taken to improve work–family balance could have different implications for long-term temporary and permanent workers.