长沙市经济适用住房货币化补贴的实践与思考

长沙出台了一系列安居政策，其中有一项重要的举措就是停止新建经济适用住房，全面实施经济适用住房货币化补贴方式，这是一次重大的变革和尝试。分析长沙实施经济适用住房货币化补贴的背景、具体做法，详细剖析经济适用住房兴建与货币化补贴的利弊，提出实施经济适用住房货币化补贴要注意的几个问题。     

北京地名管理中的片区地名问题

随着城市的发展,大量沿街商铺的涌现,门牌设置出现了同一座楼房楼下为道路门牌系统,楼上为小区门牌系统的混乱状况,如何处理片区地名的命名成为地名规划工作中的棘手问题。本文指出城市片区地名起到的作用、引发的问题,深入剖析其中原因,并提出建议,为今后地名规划工作和城市生活提供帮助。     

Retirement Villages

No abstract available for this article.     

Separate and Unequal: The Housing Act of 1968 and the Section 235 Program

In recent years scholars have identified racial disparities in wealth and home ownership as crucial factors underlying patterns of racial inequality and residential segregation in American metropolitan housing markets. While numerous federal housing policies have been identified as responsible for reinforcing residential segregation and racial inequalities in home ownership, little research has focused on the segregative effects of the Section 235 program. As one component of the 1968 Housing Act, Section 235 was designed to shift the focus of federal housing policy away from dispensing aid to local housing authorities for building public housing to providing direct supply-side subsidies to the private sector to stimulate home ownership for nonwhites and the poor. Archival and census data, government reports and housing analyses, and oral histories and interviews are used to examine the segregative effects of the Section 235 program in Kansas City, Missouri from 1969 through the early 1970s. Findings indicate that while the housing subsidy program allowed a vast majority of participating white families to purchase new housing in suburban areas, most participating African American families purchased existing homes located in racially transitional neighborhoods in the inner city. These findings corroborate recent research showing how the market-centered focus of federal housing policy has impaired the ability of African Americans to accumulate wealth through home ownership and reinforced racially segregative housing patterns.     

反命名和戏谑式命名——杨绛散文的反讽修辞

杨绛散文的反讽修辞对应着两个语境 :故事发生时的语境 ( 5 0年代初至 70年代初 )和故事写作时的语境 ( 80 - 90年代 )。她将“陪斗者”这一政治身份转化为叙述人的观察和言说视角 ,通过“反命名和戏谑式命名”的修辞方式 (表现为“我不是…”/“我是…”的语式 ) ,实现了对语境限制的反限制 ,构成了一种“互文本”的深层意义结构。其戏谑式命名的常用方式是“贬低陈述”。作为女性写作 ,杨绛选择反讽作为自己散文的基本修辞方式 ,既是时间的积累沉淀对她的话语启示 ,也是她对自己文化素质审美心智优长的一种发挥     

景点名称的文化内涵与目的论关照下导译者之策略选择

文章运用目的论的观点探讨导译者应该如何传递旅游景点名称的文化内涵。由于景点名称富于文化意义,其翻译成为旅游资料翻译的难点、重点。作为现场翻译的导译则直接承担了现场传播中国文化的重任。导译员应该充分理解、发掘景点名称的文化内涵,遵循旅游导译的目的,运用恰当的翻译策略与技巧,协助异种文化背景的游客理解其文化内涵,达到其通过旅游来体验文化他性的目的。     

《八十二种苗图并说》的成书年代考证——以余上泗《蛮峒竹枝词》为研究文本

《八十二种苗图并说》成书年代至今争议较大,但多数主张成于嘉庆时期。该书作者和研究者都认为,白仲家、车寨苗、鸦雀苗、黑脚苗、郎慈苗和六洞夷人等族称,为《百苗图》首次启用的称谓。事实上,这些族称在乾隆时期余上泗《蛮峒竹枝词》中已出现,且其所述内容与《八十二种苗图并说》十分相近。这足以说明《八十二种苗图并说》中所发现的新族称是在乾隆时期启用的。《八十二种苗图并说》当成书于乾隆中期。     

Mobility and Privilege Within Queer Studies and University

In this essay, the author considers how classist divisions present within queer studies may well be exacerbated by the institutionalization of queer studies within university. In particular, she examines the class privilege that attends both queer theory's and university's deployment of travel metaphors. In both cases, the language of travel is the potentially empowering language of intellectual agility and social mobility. Importantly, though, both queer theorists' and university administrators' employment of travel metaphors often serves to reaffirm cultural hegemony, specifically to sustain rather than to examine and combat social oppression. This sad irony is particularly apparent when one compares university representations of commuter and residential students. Thus, the question that faces universities is how to keep queer studies critically queer so that universities can recognize and address the various forms or models of social mobility that are present on their campuses, commuter as well as residential.     

苏轼笔下的酒名

酒名,凝结了中国的文化创造,作为北宋饮酒名人,苏轼笔下有众多饶有趣味的酒名。本文通过全面梳理苏轼作品中所涉及到的酒名,以期对宋代酿酒业本身、宋代乃至中国酒文化有所了解,特别是由此彰显苏轼的酒观念和饮酒背景,从而更为深入地理解这位中国文学史和文化史上的巨匠。     

澹生堂主人祁承(火業)“(火業)”字音义考辨

祁承(火業)是个值得纪念的人,由于(火業)字冷僻和字典的误解,人们对他的名字都不能正确认读。文献证明(火業)不是熯的误字,不读熯。它与烨声近义通,但不是烨的异体字。《龙龛手鉴》误字体例的宽泛性,导致了后世字典对(火業)字的误读。