论抢劫罪司法认定中的若干问题

抢劫罪作为一种多发且情形复杂的犯罪,在司法工作中有许多问题需要明确。对抢劫罪客观方面的认定、如何理解与认定"入户抢劫"、抢劫罪既遂与未遂的认定进行了明确论述。     

“失盗又遭官”的逻辑从“讳盗”现象看清代地方司法

从消弭盗贼，维护社会治安出发，清代建立了一整套预防和治理体系，但最后却似乎背道而驰．出现了“失盗又遭官”的局面。从“治盗”到“讳盗”，从“讳盗”到“诲盗”，从“失盗”到“遭官”，我们有必要梳理一下这一条线索。从而呈现清代地方司法状况以及背后的逻辑。     

事后抢劫罪述评

我国关于事后抢劫罪的立法规定不仅经历了一个漫长的嬗变过程,而且与他国规定存在着诸多差异.由于法律语言的局限性和立法技术落后等方面的原因,现行事后抢劫罪之规定在理论与实践上产生了种种分歧.笔者认为认定事后抢劫罪应着重掌握构成本罪的三个基本条件,克服三大疑难点.     

飞车抢夺行为的定性分析

近年来,飞车抢夺案件在全国各地均有发生并呈愈演愈烈之势,不仅严重侵犯了公民的财产权利,还侵犯了公民的人身权利乃至生命权利。飞车抢夺行为是一种复杂的犯罪行为,在不同的情形下表现出来的社会危害性明显不同,对其定性应该根据不同情形区别对待。     

抢夺转化为抢劫罪若干问题研究

抢夺罪与抢劫罪是一种严重侵犯公民人身权利、财产权利的犯罪其危害性较大,历来为我国刑法打击重点。本文着重对抢劫罪即抢夺转化为抢劫罪进行了比较和区分,从前提、主观、客观三个方面探讨了抢夺转化为抢劫罪的构成要件,针对抢夺转化为抢劫罪的立法问题提出了相关建议和措施,将前提“犯抢夺罪”修改为“实施抢夺行为”,把“毁灭罪证”改为“毁灭证据”并在法条中应明确规定抢夺的财物必须达到“数额较大”,才能适用刑法第二百六十九条;立法中应细化共犯的认定标准。     

The great (Australian) property crime decline

Between 1973/74 and 2000, rates of robbery, break and enter, motor vehicle theft and most other major forms of theft rose almost without interruption. Between 2000 and 2009, recorded rates of robbery in Australia fell by 63 per cent, recorded rates of burglary fell by 57 per cent, recorded rates of motor vehicle theft fell by 62 per cent, and recorded rates of all other forms of theft fell by 37 per cent. This article considers possible explanations for the fall in theft and robbery in light of the available evidence. It argues that a reduction in heroin dependence, improvements in economic outcomes, increases in the risk of arrest and imprisonment, and improved vehicle security are likely to have been significant contributors to the decline.     

Armed robbery and the meanings of money

In this study, we investigate the meanings active armed robbers give to money before, during, and after their crimes and how these meanings shape their offending. We do so by examining interviews undertaken from 1994 to 1995 with robbers in St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Prior to their robberies, the interviewees' desperation leads them to define money as essential to survival. Immediately following robberies and in looking back on them, they come to view this essential money in other ways as well—as too time-consuming to get, as “easy,” or as guilt-free. These meanings facilitate the contradictory way robbers see money as “fast” after offences. We discuss how these shifting meanings of money shape and are shaped by robbers' structural positions, cultural outlooks, and social relations. In doing so, we also help to explain how the shifting meanings of money play into criminogenic cycles of predatory offending.