文化视角中的汉英"性别歧视"语解读

"性别歧视"语是语言研究的重要组成部分.从文化的视角去审视"性别歧视"语的历史理据,解读"性别歧视"语在汉英文化中的表现层面即"性别歧视"语在字法、词法、句法、语义、习语以及姓名、称呼和婚姻中的种种表现,将会给我们带来重要的启示.     

英语词汇与性别歧视

语言文字是一个民族文化的结晶和载体,不仅记录了该民族的物质生活和精神生活的面貌,而且还积淀了丰富的传统文化内涵。剖析典型英语女性词汇,可以窥视到女性所遭受的性别歧视。     

从语义变化探察英汉语中性别歧视的社会根源

语言是一种社会现象,是不能脱离社会独自存在的。语言本身是没有性别歧视的,所谓的性别歧视语言是因为社会上各方面所表现出的对女性的歧视反映在语言中,即语言的使用者有社会歧视,才导致了语言中的性别歧视。可以从英汉词汇的语义变化方面看到其中的性别歧视。     

西方性别角色态度研究述评

20世纪 70年代以来 ,西方性别角色态度研究有以下特点 :测量量表多样化 ;研究的概念复杂化 ;跨文化研究 ;性别角色态度发生变化。西方性别角色态度的最新发展是矛盾的性别主义理论的产生     

女性的三重困境——《女勇士》的第三世界女性主义解读

运用第三世界女性主义理论分析《女勇士》中华裔美国女性同时遭受的种族压迫、性别压迫和阶级压迫,从而证明美国女性主义在分析华裔美国女性境遇时的偏颇,指出华裔美国女性在追求解放的过程中要同时反抗三重压迫。     

Cultural Sexism is Ordinary: Writing and Re‐Writing Women in Academia

When we ‘write women’ in academia, the focus in much of the literature to date has been to write about women. The focus of this article is the writing of women themselves; to give voice to women's experiences as constructors of knowledge. Through so doing this article uses writing as praxis; as a mechanism to disrupt, challenge and open a space for renegotiation of cultural norms within academic institutions. Based on qualitative data collection over a six‐year period, this article writes women's experiences and unpacks the way in which cultural sexism has become an ordinary feature of women's academic lives. It also considers ways in which the underlying cultural interpretations of hegemonic masculinized structures may be re‐written.     

标记与性别歧视

标记最初被认为是使一个音素与另一个音素彼此相对立的可判断依据,后来标记理论被应用到语言学中的每一个层次和构成上。标记可以分为规范标记、分类标记和语义标记。通过对英语中一些男性和女性术语的仔细研究可见,一些女性术语中隐藏着消极的含义,而男性术语隐藏着积极的含义,显然这是性别歧视在语言上的反映。     

英语中性别歧视现象原因探究

性别歧视是性别语言研究的一个方面,是在揭示了语言的不对称现象以后提出的课题。在依据前人对Sapir-Whorf理论假说研究成果的基础上,分析性别歧视出现、发展和变化的社会因素、文化因素和心理因素。     

用标记理论透视英语词汇中的性别歧视

标记是一个范畴内部存在的某种不对称现象。运用标记理论,从形式、语义和分布三方面分析英语中表示男性的词汇和表示女性的词汇之间存在的性别标记的非对称性,从而揭示英语词汇所反映的性别歧视现象。     

The Structural Components of Violence in Black Male-Female Relationships

Abstract

An Afrocentric perspective provides a point of departure for the understanding of black male-female violence. American society is defined by and derived from core or dominant values, which have differentially impacted its diverse populations. The Lens Model presented in this discourse focuses on these values as being counterproductive for black male-female relationships. Capitalism, racism, sexism and the Judeo-Christian ethic comprise the four-prong institutional or structural value components of the Lens Model. This dynamic framework is instructive as it helps social scientists view domestic violence in black adult relationships from a different perspective. The Lens Model has a connection to the “scientific method” which purports detachment, objectivity, and impartiality.