德性内涵的变迁与20世纪中国文学

自"五四"以降,德性内涵就一直变动不居,传统理性、现代理性、后现代理性交互影响、彼此渗透,直接带来了德性内涵的多种指向与流变。德性内涵渗透到作家主体意识,与其生命体验、审美感悟交相影响、碰撞与呼应,使20世纪中国文学呈现出多种样态,进而制约甚至决定着其发展流变的走向,在婚恋文学中表现尤其如此。     

论费希特对十九世纪浪漫主义文学的影响

费希特是浪漫主义最重要、最直接的精神导师,他的主观唯心主义哲学滋养了许多浪漫主义的核心人物,为他们的创作思想和方法涂上了一层鲜亮的自我哲学色彩,并促使他们彻底摆脱了古典主义教条的束缚。费希特对浪漫主义文学的积极影响主要有四个方面：一、对自我的解放;二、反讽创作观和人生态度;三、风格即人的审美原则;四、干预现实的实践愿望。但费希特对自我主体的过分夸大也导致浪漫主义有逃避现实、走向虚无的倾向。     

价值的主体性维度及其意蕴

主体性是价值的根本特性。从主体(人)出发,深刻认识主体,充分理解和把握价值的主体性,是研究和解决价值问题的关键。从主要关注客体转向关注主客体关系、特别是关注主体,立足主体性维度进行价值分析、乃至一切哲学问题的分析,具有重要的意义。它突出了主体的权力和责任,消解了价值的客观性神话、普遍性神话、以及所谓永恒的“价值真理”。而且,价值的这种“主体性”是一种客观现实,它本身是不可能被“摧毁”或“消解”的。     

物质的追求能否带来快乐与幸福--物质主义价值观及其影响研究

物质主义通常指一种强调物质拥有和社会声望重要性的个体价值观。高物质主义者在对外部目标的追求与基本心理需要的满足之间形成了一个不断循环的怪圈。这个循环体系维系了物质主义的生活方式,却也带来更低的自我评价、更高的不满意感和更负面的情绪反应。文章概括了物质主义价值观对幸福感的影响以及社会比较和自尊在其中的中介作用;物质主义价值观对人际信任与助人意愿的影响,也为指导大众树立正确的消费观念,开启健康的生活模式提供了建议和引导。     

影响居民幸福感的社会因素研究——基于CGSS2005数据的分析

基于CGSS2005数据,建立多层次模型对影响居民幸福感的社会因素进行分析,发现,经济收入、住房产权、人际交往、贫富分化、民主参与、政府服务、社会保障、矛盾纠纷等对居民幸福感水平有显著的影响,提升居民幸福感水平必须从上述各方面入手。     

亚里士多德“幸福”之可能

亚里士多德是西方哲学史上最伟大的哲学家之一,其思想影响极其深远。其中他的幸福观是其伦理学研究的核心。他把“幸福”作为人生追求的最终目的;认为幸福在于德性,实践性的现实活动;指出中道原则在实现幸福中的重要作用。尽管在一定程度上,亚里士多德的“幸福”太理想化、圣化。不过,其幸福观在今天仍有一定的借鉴意义。     

Children's Perspectives on Happiness and Subjective Well‐being in Preschool

Photo‐elicited interviews indicate that children hardly ever mention educators when asked about elements in preschool that make them feel happy. Happiness is found to occur in activities in the ‘underlife’ of the ECEC institution. Children challenge adult rules and norms in order to create status in the peer‐group, while at the same time, they seek to construct social identity and maintain a positive relationship with their educators. A child that manages to balance both adult expectations and what is needed to participate in the underlife among peers, experiences happiness and thus, is in a good state of well‐being.     

Is the Study of Happiness a Worthy Scientific Pursuit?

This paper critiques the view that the study of happiness is not a worthy scientific pursuit. The happiness set point and hedonic treadmill theories denote the complexity of increasing happiness levels due to genetic limitations and adaptation, however, there is mounting evidence to suggest that with the use of appropriate measures and specific interventions aimed at fostering strengths and virtues, happiness can be increased. Furthermore, the benefits of investigating methods for increasing happiness include improvements in physical, psychological and social health and well-being. It is concluded that approaching human needs from a top down or holistic standpoint where individuals can use their strengths to overcome life’s challenges, is beneficial to health and well-being. Hence, the study of happiness is a worthy scientific pursuit.     

Your position in society matters for how happy you are

This article shows that people's perception of their position in society is strongly correlated with their level of happiness, and thus that differences in happiness levels among countries in different welfare state clusters are influenced by people's perceptions of their relative position in society (subjective position). The study drew on data from the European Social Survey. Two important findings emerged from the analysis. First, an individual's subjective position in society is a more important predictor of happiness than objective measures such as income, education and labour market position. Second, the link between individuals’ perceived position in society and their level of happiness is moderated by the welfare state. In the Nordic countries, people's perceptions of their position in society have less influence on happiness whereas in Eastern European countries we found a strong connection between subjective position and happiness.