刑事违法性功能论

大陆法系违法性理论具有限制刑罚权发动和保障人权的功能 ,有利于罪刑法定和刑法实质正义的实现。我国刑事违法性依附于社会危害性而存在 ,不具有实体内容和独立品格。刑事违法性评价由于没有和社会危害性评价形成层次鲜明的递进式结构 ,造成我国刑事违法性理论的功能缺失。丰富我国的刑事违法性概念 ,构建双层次刑事违法性评价机制 ,是完善刑事违法性理论和实现其功能的当然选择     

文学语言规范化的若干思考

文学语言的规范化,涉及两个问题:一是文学语言的特质;二是文学语言规范化的层次问题。新和美是文学语言自身的规范,这一规范同时包括语言规范、言语规范与文学语言规范3个层面。本文从以上两方面回答了文学语言要不要规范,文学语言能不能规范,文学语言有没有规范的问题。     

论网络道德基本规范的建构及其发展前景

本文从研究网络道德的本质及特点出发,重点探讨了网络道德基本规范的内容,提出了"爱国"、"守法"、"无害"、"友善"四条网络基本道德规范要求.     

Spencer is dead, long live Spencer: individualism, holism, and the problem of norms

The debate between the advocates of sociological individualism and those of holism has been pervasive in the development of social theory. This debate is often situated in the false problems of sociology, since it is seen as a particular form of the perennial and irresolvable dilemma between social nominalism and realism, as well as between freedom and determinism. Nevertheless, the debate is far from over within contemporary sociology and other social science, as indicated by the resurgence of individualism in rational action theory and its repudiation by holistic social theories. The aim of this paper is to identify some modern variations on this theme as well as to discern certain common tendencies of two seemingly opposite theoretical perspectives, viz. the convergence upon a normative solution to the problem of social order. This convergence is therefore denoted normative convergence between sociological individualism and holistic sociology.     

中国社会学20年:回顾与前瞻

近 2 0年来 ,中国社会学在理论研究与实证研究、定性研究与定量研究、总体性研究与分支研究、社会学的本土化等方面都得到了迅速发展。面向 2 1世纪的社会学需要进一步树立学术规范 ;完善学科体系的建设 ;加强对城市社会学、经济社会学、组织社会学、社会学研究方法等分支学科的研究与教学 ;在培养高层次研究人员的同时 ,注重培养社会调查、社区管理、社会保障、社会工作、社会政策等应用型人才。     

新中国27年的文学运动:走向极端政治化的文学规范及其崩溃

新中国 2 7年的文学运动是在不断强化文学的政治意识功能 ,弱化甚至排斥它的审美本性的过程中运行的。虽然在 50年代中期崛起的探索性文艺潮流试图对现实主义原则加以重新探讨 ,但很快便在反右斗争的浪潮中消失了。 60年代初期的文艺调整再次试图激活文艺的生机 ,但在法西斯专制主义文艺思潮的围剿下 ,不仅使文学置于荒漠的境地 ,而且使这种规范自身走向了崩溃     

刑事诉讼证明标准新探

文章简要阐述了刑事诉讼证明标准的特征,对各种有代表性的观点进行了评析,并提出了实体真实     

The Failure of Labor Dispatch Regulation and Its Remedy

In the course of the drafting, enactment and amendment of the Labor Contract Law of the People’s Republic of China, the legal provisions regulating labor dispatch have been tightened up. In practice, however, the labor dispatch system is flourishing in a way that defies market trends. The ultimate reason for this is that much of the system goes under the name of human resource outsourcing to bamboozle the public and evade the law, in effect making the legal provisions a dead letter. The result is that the more the industry is regulated, the more it multiplies and the more chaotic it becomes. Based on comparative law research methodology, this article reviews the legal systems relating to labor dispatch in Germany, the US and other countries. It demonstrates and affirms the institutional value of the labor dispatch system, and categorizes its different types. The fundamental cause of the phenomenon of labor dispatch’s assumption of the guise of human resource outsourcing is the absence of substantive review. We suggest introducing and perfecting such investigation to stem the industry’s deep-seated abuses.     

浅析法律方法及其适用

法律方法是联结法律理论与实务的桥梁和纽带,其正确适用与否将事关司法审判结果的公正与否,因而意义重大。在法律日益专业化和职业化的今天,法律已经成为法律专业人士的一门技术工作,更离不开对法律方法的掌握与适用。我们应当了解法律方法的研究对象和一般的法律方法,能够做到自觉运用,科学指导我们的法律实务工作,推动法律适用的科学严谨,实现法律的公平和正义之要求。