重视住院病人需求 完善护理服务文化

文化是指人类在社会历史发展过程中所创造的物质财富和精神财富的总和 ,这里特指精神财富。把服务与文化联系在一起 ,不禁使人感受到源远流长的五千多年的华夏文化。文化与医疗服务是紧密相连的 ,是医院服务工作探讨、研究的主题。医院文化内涵丰富 ,是医院两个文明建设的基础 ,也是提高医疗护理服务质量、端正医德医风的基础工作 ,具有育人、导向、激励、凝聚、约束的功能与作用。     

庭审实质化背景下交叉询问规则探析

党的十八届四中全会提出推进以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革,突出强调法庭审理的实质意义。在法庭审理中,进行交叉询问是实现庭审实质化的必然要求。我国虽然建立了交叉询问规则的基本框架,但仍存在着一些不足,如交叉询问在运用中较为混乱、证人多数情况下不出庭作证以及交叉询问规则不完善等。因此,在推进以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革及落实庭审实质化进程中,应在借鉴国外成熟经验的基础上不断完善我国庭审中的交叉询问规则。     

论中国特色教师教育体系的应然图景

健全中国特色教师教育体系,是适应我国教师教育主要矛盾转化的现实要求,是加快实现我国教育现代化的重要支撑,是夯实教育强国建设之基的基础工程。中国特色教师教育体系是一个开放的大系统,其基本图景应体现"高质量开放、制度化协同、实质性联动"三个特征。推动实现"高质量的开放",需要建立基于相应标准的办学资格认证开放体系、基于专业教育的教师资格认证开放体系、基于生源质量的教师学历教育开放体系、基于学科发展的教师教育专业开放体系;推动实现制度化协同,需要建立师范专业招生"研判"制度、中小学(幼儿园)参与师范生培养的法定义务和绩效制度,完善教师编制政策,制定县级教师发展中心建设标准;推动实现实质性联动,需要建立"校级、省级、国家级"三级教师教育质量年度报告制度,建立基于"US模式"的教师教育者常态化交流制度,启动实施"互联网+教师教育"创新行动。健全中国特色的教师教育体系应该把握并遵循公共属性、政治属性、道德属性、多样化属性这四个基本属性及原则。公共属性凸显教师教育的社会责任,政治属性内含教师教育的本质要求,道德属性彰显教师教育的专业伦理,多样化属性则反映着教师教育的灵活特征,这四个属性统一并渗透于构建中国特色教师教育体系的全部过程、各个环节和基本要素。     

个性化需求决定产品的功能与形式

产品的功能应包括使用、审美、象征三个方面,并通过多种产品式样的物化形式来实现产品的全部功能,以满足消费者个性化的多样性需求。消费市场是可以被设计、开发和制造的,消费需求是决定产品功能和产品式样不断更新、拓展、延伸的因素。     

要把师德建设放在突出位置

为了进一步贯彻落实党的十六大精神和《公民道德建设实施纲要》 ,全面推进素质教育 ,高等学校要切实把师德建设作为一项长期的基础性工作 ,坚持不懈地抓紧抓好。为此要进一步完善师德规范要点、具体要求以及考核的办法。     

网络环境下，图书馆的读者网络服务工作浅探

文章从网络环境下读者服务方式变化入手,根据读者信息需求的特点,提出图书馆开展读者网络服务的一些新举措。     

语文教育专业职业技能训练的目标要求及成效

任何一个训练体系都必须包含训练的目标要求。为此,本文明确提出了语文教育专业每个层次各项职业技能训练的目标要求,并介绍了据此实施的情况及成效。     

Achieving pay equity: Strategic mobilization for substantive equality in Aotearoa New Zealand

In an unprecedented move the New Zealand Government in 2017 announced a $2 billion pay equity settlement for 55,000 healthcare workers in aged and disability residential care and home and community support services. The settlement reversed the Government's previous austerity stance that pay equity for carers was too expensive, and that pay parity in the sector was out of the question. The political concession followed five years of intensive equal pay feminist activism. While pay equity settlements overseas have generally used either legal opportunity structures or government intervention, this article argues it was the combination of complementary and intersecting elements of mobilization that led to the negotiated settlement. These elements include a statutory human rights inquiry; legal opportunity; civil society coalition building; increased women's voice; and a government‐led negotiated settlement. The novel theoretical contribution of this article is its empirical support for the concept of substantive equality.     

英国慈善法中的公益性标准及启示

公益性标准在英国慈善法中具有极其重要的地位，体现了慈善的核心价值。现行英国慈善法中有两个关于公益性标准的基本原则，即慈善组织的公益性必须是可识别的、客观的；慈善组织的受益人必须是社会公众或社会公众的一部分。在英国慈善法中，慈善的公益性标准主要通过慈善组织发布公共利益报告和慈善委员会对公共利益进行评估的途径得到实现。借鉴英国慈善法中的公益性标准，我们应该通过完善慈善事业法规政策体系明确规定慈善组织的公益性标准，并设立专门监管机构负责公益性标准的实施。     

A Restricted Subset Selection Rule for Selecting at Least One of the t Best Normal Populations in Terms of Their Means When Their Common Variance is Known,Case II

Consider k( ? 2) normal populations with unknown means μ₁, …, μ_k, and a common known variance σ². Let μ_[1] ? ??? ? μ_[k] denote the ordered μ_i.The populations associated with the t(1 ? t ? k ? 1) largest means are called the t best populations. Hsu and Panchapakesan (2004) proposed and investigated a procedure R_HPfor selecting a non empty subset of the k populations whose size is at most m(1 ? m ? k ? t) so that at least one of the t best populations is included in the selected subset with a minimum guaranteed probability P* whenever μ_{[k ? t + 1]} ? μ_{[k ? t]} ? δ*, where P*?and?δ* are specified in advance of the experiment. This probability requirement is known as the indifference-zone probability requirement. In the present article, we investigate the same procedure R_HP for the same goal as before but when k ? t < m ? k ? 1 so that at least one of the t best populations is included in the selected subset with a minimum guaranteed probability P* whatever be the configuration of the unknown μ_i. The probability requirement in this latter case is termed the subset selection probability requirement. Santner (1976) proposed and investigated a different procedure (R_S) based on samples of size n from each of the populations, considering both cases, 1 ? m ? k ? t and k ? t < m ? k. The special case of t = 1 was earlier studied by Gupta and Santner (1973) and Hsu and Panchapakesan (2002) for their respective procedures.