浅谈先秦时期身份犯问题

身份犯是指具备一定身份的人犯罪。身份犯是东方家庭奴隶制社会最基本的犯罪形式；在春秋中叶以前，犯罪主体的身份是血缘世族身份；在春秋末期及战国时代，犯罪主体的身份向法定身份过渡，但血缘世族身份仍占很大比例，起重要作用；奴隶社会身份犯的这种发展趋势，是社会经济、政治、文化进步的重要标志。     

Analysing drug abuse with British Crime Survey data: modelling and questionnaire design issues

We use the British Crime Survey (BCS) to analyse the demand for illicit drugs and the implications of drug use for the probability of subsequent unemployment. We demonstrate that the BCS questionnaire has a serious design flaw for this purpose, and we propose some simple modifications. We also develop a modelling technique that is suitable for existing BCS data and apply it to the 1994 and 1996 samples. We find evidence that soft drug use is associated with a greatly increased probability of later hard drug use and that past drug use is associated with increased probabilities of unemployment.     

预防未成年人犯罪研究

本文围绕我国未成年人犯罪率居高不下这一个严峻的社会问题进行思考和研讨,剖析了未成年人犯罪的新动向和原因,并以中共十六届四中全会精神为指导,论述了预防未成年人犯罪是一个复杂的系统工程,家庭、学校、社会应高度关注,密切配合,齐抓共管。     

论洗钱罪的犯罪构成要件

洗钱罪侵犯的客体是司法管理制度和金融管理制度,主要是司法管理制度。洗钱罪的上游犯罪应该扩大到任何有非法所得及收益的犯罪,洗钱罪的主体也应该扩大到包括上游犯罪人在内,洗钱罪的主观方面应包括间接故意。     

洗钱罪若干法律问题浅论

洗钱罪是我国新刑法增加的一个罪名。这对于打击日益猖獗的洗钱犯罪和其他与之相关的犯罪有着极为重要的意义。但有关洗钱罪的概念、犯罪构成、立法上存在的缺陷及完善等问题争议颇大,进一步的研究和探讨,对反洗钱理论的构建和反洗钱的实践具有借鉴作用。     

试论受贿罪客观要件的有关问题

受贿罪是指国家工作人员利用职务便利 ,索取他人财物或非法收受他人财物 ,为他人谋取利益的行为。受贿罪有三种类型 :标准型受贿罪 ;准受贿罪 ;斡旋受贿罪。三种受贿罪都有不同的客观要件 ,在实践中也存在着分歧之处需要完善 ,使国家工作人员在职务行为中保持廉洁、自律     

关于犯罪预防体系的思考

仅仅研究犯罪预防的具体措施是不够的,必须从总体上构建犯罪预防体系.科学的犯罪预防体系应当具备超前性、对应性和复合性三个支点.超前性从总体上影响犯罪预防的整体思路;对应性直接针对犯罪产生的原因,对症下药;复合性确保参与犯罪预防的主体、各类预防措施有机地纳入统一的整体之中.三个支点缺一不可.     

论犯罪客观要件是刑事违法的具体价值标准

刑法分则规定的犯罪客观要件既是源于生活事实的类型,也是赋予法益保护价值的类型,是事实与价值的统一。它是刑事违法的具体价值标准。生活行为符合犯罪客观要件且侵害刑法法益就具有刑事违法性。     

对包头市未成年人犯罪问题的思考

未成年人犯罪是一个非常严重的社会问题,认真剖析未成年人犯罪的现状,分析其中的原因,提出预防和遏制未成年人犯罪的对策,对预防和遏制未成年人犯罪,维护社会的稳定有着极为重要的意义。     

American crime drops: Investigating the breaks,dips and drops in temporal homicide

ObjectivesWhile a great deal of attention has been given to the 1990s crime drop, less is known about the more recent decline in homicide rates that occurred in several large U.S. cities. This paper aims to explore whether these represent two distinct drops via statistical evidence of structural breaks in longitudinal homicide trends and explore potentially differing explanations for the two declines. Methods: Using homicide data on a large sample of U.S. cities from 1990 to 2011, we test for structural breaks in temporal homicide rates. Combining census data and a time series approach, we also examine the role structural features, demographic shifts, and crime control strategies played in the changes in homicide rates over time. Results: Statistical evidence demonstrates two structural breaks in homicide trends, with one trend reflecting the 1990s crime drop (1994–2002) and another trend capturing a second decline (2007–2011). Time series analysis confirms previous research findings about the contributions of structural conditions (e.g., disadvantage) and crime control strategies (e.g., police force size) to the crime drop of the 1990s, but these factors cannot account for the more recent drop with the exception of police presence. Conclusions: Although both structural conditions and crime control strategies are critical to the longitudinal trends in homicide rates over the entire span from 1990 to 2011, different factors account for these two distinct temporal trends.