道德治理的三重向度——斯密视角及其当下启示

道德治理概念的提出,既是直面当前道德问题的一种理论自觉,也成为改善当下社会道德状况、提升道德水平的现实课题。而亚当·斯密对导致道德情操败坏的原因的分析,以及对惩罚与正义、欲望与良知、报偿与信仰的理论叙述,对当下社会认识各种败德现象的成因以及就解决各种道德问题所能谋求的治理之道,提供了可资借鉴的理论资源和实践参照。     

西南民族大学金·史密斯藏学文献馆的建馆历程

著名藏学家金·史密斯先生用一生的时间从事藏文文献的保护工作,在藏文文献的收集、整理、研究、利用等领域做出了巨大的贡献,为后人留下了大量的藏文文献。他在美国纽约建立了藏传佛教文献资料中心（简称：TBRC）,大量的藏文文献在国内、外藏学界利用起来。同时他也是把藏文文献的原件从国外捐赠给中国的第一位外国藏学家,2012年12月,历时5年的藏文纸质文献的捐赠工作顺利完成。本论文对金·史密斯先生建立TBRC的具体情况,捐赠纸质文献给西南民族大学的事件,西南民族大学金·史密斯藏学文献馆建馆历程等内容进行梳理,以此来缅怀为藏文文献的保护工作付出一生的美国藏学家。     

Self-interest and the theory of action

The concept of self-interest remains underdeveloped in sociology although central to economics. Recent methodological and social trends render sociological indifference to the concept untenable. The term has enjoyed historical predominance in the West since the sixteenth century. While it is seen in modern economics as a singular motivating force, Adam Smith regarded self-interest in economic action as necessarily moderated by sympathy. In addition to its problematic economic conceptualization self-interest has an experiential basis in unequal power relations. An alternative to the concept of self-interest is presented by Amartya Sen in his account of commitment; its inconsistencies, however, render Sen's statement unsatisfactory. Differences between present and future interests indicate that the distinction between self-interested and other-interested action is not sustainable.     

Desperately seeking social approval: Adam Smith, Thorstein Veblen and the moral limits of capitalist culture

Adam Smith and Thorstein Veblen shared much in matters of economic ontology. Both dismissed the very notion of an autonomous economic self and instead investigated the processes through which self and other are mutually constituted under changing cultural traditions of individual aspiration. Their strikingly similar critiques of status-oriented consumption and concern for the moral basis of the market economy are established in this manner. However, the political implications of their analyses point in different directions, with Veblen being the more radical. The Smithian individual can always use spectatorial insights to assert through genuinely praiseworthy behaviour personal moral distance from social norms of status-oriented consumption. The Veblenian individual, by contrast, has no such capacity for elevating abstract moral principles above socially-situated conduct, as mind and environment co-evolve in line with changing material circumstances of life. For Veblen, the rise of status-oriented consumption itself acted as a form of moral self-education that more deeply entrenched the social norms of ownership out of which it arose, thus the impossibility of an autonomous economic self was matched by the impossibility of an autonomous moral self. To his way of thinking, moral degradation in conspicuous consumption was irredeemably inscribed into the whole cultural structure of capitalism.     

解读斯密和马克思的劳动分工理论

人类社会经济增长的动力是历代经济学家致力于解释的一个问题。学术界一般认为,该问题的经典解释起源于斯密和马克思的劳动分工理论。按照这一思维线索,首先回顾亚当.斯密(Adam Smith)关于劳动分工的论述,然后介绍卡尔.马克思(Kari Marx)对劳动分工理论的继承和发展,最后在综述和比较的基础上作简要的评论,旨在通过重新解读斯密和马克思的劳动分工理论,对经济增长的原动力有更深入的理解。     

论"经济人"与"道德人"的和谐及其现实影响——从亚当·斯密说起

亚当·斯密的《国富论》和《道德情操论》引申出了“经济人”与“道德人”两个概念,“经济人”与“道德人”反映了人的不同方面的需求,两者并不是统一的,更不是和谐的,而是对立的和谐。“经济人”是利己主义,“道德人”是利他主义,而我们强调两者的结合是建立在两者的冲突的基础上,“经济人”与“道德人”的和谐依赖于一种“看不见的手”的力量。这种和谐思想对市场经济建设而言具有重要意义,首先是需要不断强调人作为“道德人”的一面,否则市场经济体系将无法建立,同时要促进两者之间的结合,达到利己与利他之间的和谐,进而树立正确的义利观。     

同情、美德与秩序——亚当·斯密同情概念析论

在所谓"斯密问题"的理论定势中,同情往往被读解成一种行为动机,斯密却赋予同情概念以颇为特殊的含义.公正旁观者的同情作为一种普遍性的道德评价尺度,不仅成为道德赞许或责难的基础,也诠释了美德的本质及其特征.而其所内涵的对合宜性的道德诉求,更体现了对保持社会秩序与和谐的崇高冲动,这对当下社会和谐与市场社会的道德需求而言,仍具有重要的启示性意义.     

一类有广泛适用性的综合控制算法

将闭环极点配置、史密斯予估和自适应控制策略有机地结合起来,提出了一类单、多变量自校正史密斯予估综合控制算法。并用数字仿真进行了验证。     

论亚当·斯密的伦理思想特征

亚当.斯密的伦理思想独辟蹊径,将理性伦理与经验伦理结合,使情感伦理学完善并成一体系,结合经济领域,以合宜为标尺,寻找道德行为与经济利益的和谐。     

对亚当·斯密价值论的理性分析

亚当·斯密是英国工场手工业时期的资产阶级古典政治经济学的集大成者,他在前人研究的基础上,成功地将英国资产阶级政治经济学推向了一个新的阶段,尤其是他的价值理论,在今天看来,都还有些合理的成份。而马克思劳动价值理论正是他对亚当·斯密价值论研究基础上创新而发展起来的科学理论。本文将阐述亚当·斯密价值论的合理内核和缺陷。