论台独势力发展的三个阶段及其特点

台独势力在发展过程中明显地呈现为萌芽起始,流亡活动以及公开云集台湾这三个不同的历史发展阶段。每个阶段又分别有“口诛毛伐”、恐怖活动以及参数政夺权等特点与其相对应。透过这三个阶段及其不同特点又可发现：第一,台独势力在各阶段的发展过程中均离不开大国的插手与庇护;第二,台湾当局逐渐脱离一个中国的立场,在分裂祖国的道路上越走越远。     

土尔扈特人在伏尔加河时期的联姻状况述评

土尔扈特蒙古西迁至伏尔加河流域后,与杜尔伯特、准噶尔、和硕特、喀尔喀、卡巴尔达之间发生过多次联姻。土尔扈特与杜尔伯特联姻是伏尔加河流域杜尔伯特部形成的重要原因,是修复双方联盟关系的重要手段,也是导致杜尔伯特未随渥巴锡东归的关键原因。土尔扈特和准噶尔的联姻是双方联盟的纽带,可以促进部落间交流,增强彼此间团结互信,巩固联盟,壮大实力;但是,联姻的破裂对双方的内外政治环境都会产生长久而深刻的不利影响。     

我国高校在中外合作办学中的联盟治理模式探析

中外合作办学的产生和发展是教育规律、管理规律、经济规律共同发生作用的结果.国内高校与境外高校开展国际合作,从管理方式上说建立的是联盟治理关系.联盟关系的建立及其运行机制直接影响高等学校跨国之间合作的效果和质量.境内外高校要以国际化发展来增强竞争力,可从宏观和微观两个维度上建立和完善联盟治理机制,在联盟治理上达成共识,以此增强合作的效果.     

South Africa: conceptualising a politics of human‐oriented development

This paper presents one example of the process whereby a writer like C. Louis Leipoldt absorbed living oral Afrikaans history and converted it into written Afrikaans documentation. This example serves to illustrate a larger process which he applied to the construction and composition of a sequence of four historical novels dealing with analogous material in English. The purpose is to record some of the problems and implications of a Leipoldt editing project, which is still in progress, and to formulate some of the related aspects of interpreting historical fiction as historical source material. The paper proposes that one of the traumatic events of South African literature is the shift from oracy to literacy, and that many South African writers have displayed a special guardianship of this shift in terms of literary procedures which follow different norms than those of the cultural historian.     

The Alliance for Jobs in Germany: The Promise and Failure of Gender Mainstreaming

SUMMARY

The German Alliance for Jobs, Education and Competitiveness, a new policy instrument for reducing unemployment, was introduced by the red-green coalition government in 1998. In 2000, this policy instrument was abandoned, largely because business, labor, and government could not find sufficient common ground to continue working together. I argue that this policy instrument had the potential to affect the female workforce positively but that leaders from all sectors failed to incorporate gender considerations. In my view, the German economy will continue to lag behind its competitors unless it adopts gender mainstreaming, increases opportunities for women, and transforms its economy into a more service-oriented economy.     

Neither complements nor substitutes: Examining the case for coalignment of contract-based and relation-based alliance governance mechanisms in coopetition contexts

Although the extant literature recognizes that the contract-based and relation-based alliance governance mechanisms (AGMs) play a significant role in the success of alliances, the nature of their interplay still remains ambiguous. In this study, we move away from the traditional debate between contract- and relation-based AGMs as substitutes versus complements. Instead, we offer the notion of “fit” or the “coalignment” as a more appropriate frame to explain the interplay between contract- and relation-based AGMs in the coopetition context. We conceptualize ‘Coalignment of Alliance Governance Mechanisms’ (CAGM) as a distinct higher-order construct and outline a methodological orientation to estimate the coalignment of the two forms of AGMs. We conduct a longitudinal study using primary data from 320 matched coopetition alliances in high-technology research-intensive sectors in India and find that the CAGM explains better the impact of governance mechanisms on value creation in coopetition alliances.     

中德俄联盟泄密后的各方反应

孙中山的中德俄联盟经陈炯明向外报泄露后,引起国内外的强烈反应。列强诬称为“过激主义”和“亲布尔什维克”。英法新闻界指称是俄国布尔什维克主义的阴谋。北京政府表示“密切关注此事”。政界人物曹锟和吴佩孚也立即声明“与孙中山没有任何关联”。社会上也不乏为陈炯明的叛逆行为辩护者。孙中山不得不发表声明,澄清事实。上海《民国日报》为中德俄联盟辩护。中共认为这是关系中国民族独立的外交政策,不遗余力地宣传与辩护。共产国际和苏俄也支持中德俄联盟的宣传。从对中德俄联盟的态度和反应可以管窥国共两党与帝国主义、共产国际和苏俄的复杂关系。     

道格尔古碑再探

本文在多次实地考察研究的基础上，对位于甘南州碌曲县拉仁关乡玛日村的道格尔古碑的有关问题进行了重新探讨，提出并论证了道格尔古碑是唐蕃长庆会盟的分界碑的观点。并对以往发表的《道格尔古碑初探》一文的部分结论做了必要的更正     

The management of firms’ alliance network positioning: Implications for innovation

In spite of the frequent calls for a much more integrated approach, the field of management still faces the ever continuing challenges in attempting to bridge the gap between academic research and managerial actions and practices. The field of strategic alliances and firms’ networks are those among which research and practice are more diverging. Trying to cover this separation, the article presents an empirical research on automotive industry that investigates the effects on innovation performance of the position that firms occupy in the network of alliances. The hypothesis that guides this research is that innovation is generated not only from the resources that a company is able to develop internally, but also through access to resources and capabilities owned by the external companies and organizations that the firm itself is tied to through alliances and cooperation agreements. Beyond this broad argument, the paper links tightly research and practice showing way and how the quality of access to resources owned by partners is influenced by the position occupied in the network of alliances and not only by the existence of single collaborative ties. Assuming a managerial approach which relies on the milestones of network research, different types of positioning in the network of alliances are discussed and tested on their impact on innovation.     

Firm-nonprofit collaboration: Explaining the rationale behind firms’ cross-sector partner choices

Cross-sector partnerships between firms and nonprofit organizations (NPOs) are emerging at an unprecedented rate to address sustainability issues. Extant research on cross-sector partnerships explains the firms' motivations to engage in partnerships but little is known about what drives the firms' partner choice. We build on firm-firm alliance research, differentiating between network-reinforcing and network-broadening strategies for finding partners. Based on a qualitative study with 33 experts from 17 frontrunner companies and 14 partnering NPOs, as well as secondary data, we assess the trade-offs between these two strategies and explore firms’ partner search and selection decisions. We advance cross-sector partnership research by proposing three drivers to explain why firms in our sample preferred to reinforce (rather than to broaden) their networks when forming additional cross-sector partnerships for sustainability. Moreover, we propose two conditions to explain why frontrunner firms often rely on opportunity-driven (rather than search-driven) partnership formation. These insights shed light on the type of formation strategy used in the context of cross-sector partnerships for sustainability.