中国医疗改革：道德与正义的考量

我国医疗体制改革是在中国农村和城市全面改革的大背景下进行的。中国改革取得成功的深层动因是允许个人功利的追求。这一背景也深刻影响到了医疗体制改革。医疗体制改革的重要趋向就是医院的市场化。市场化使得医院几乎成为单纯商业化运作的事业，因而市场正义成为医疗公正的取向。这是医疗改革失败的深层精神原因。走出这一困境就必须加大政府投入，使得医院从市场正义回归社会公平的正义；并在克服商业化倾向的同时，还需要有人道主义精神的重建。     

Judging childhood

This article brings ethnohistorical inquiry to bear in exploring the certainties of Progressive Era reformers regarding the role of the state, the meaning of childhood, and the power of intervention in the lives of children, youth, and families in Butte, Montana. The author draws on the key themes of the Just Practice perspective (Finn & Jacobson, 2008)—as an organizing frame to explore assumptions and contestations regarding childhood, well-being, trouble, and intervention as expressed through primary source documents and reports of juvenile court proceedings in Butte from 1900 to 1914. Butte, a site of rapid industrialization at the turn of the last century, provides a local context in which to examine ways these certainties were asserted, negotiated, embedded, and resisted in the making of a nascent system of child welfare and juvenile justice. The historical analysis offers a foundation for critical reflection on the certainties embedded in contemporary practice with children and youth.     

《水浒传》梁山聚义性质的传播学分析

《水浒传》中梁山聚义替天行道攻打官府的运动,到底是什么性质的,古往今来争论不休。古代文人多认为是忠义行为,也有部分正统文人认为是叛逆造反;上世纪20年代开始有人提出农民革命的说法,之后这一说法成为主导,似是不易之论;到了80年代才有人开始提出流民起义、忠义之举、武侠行为、反叛法律等非农民起义的观点。基于此,从传播学的视角对学术界关于《水浒传》梁山聚义性质的研究进行了解读分析,认为《水浒传》梁山聚义性质的研究是一个假命题,由于人们的错误理解而进入《水浒传》研究的范畴,再加上我国文史不分的传统、阶级分析法的引进和政治形势使然,使得这一命题的研究俨然成了现实中《水浒传》研究的必然议题。     

No place called home: the causes and social consequences of the UK housing ‘bubble’

This paper examines the key causes and social consequences of the much debated UK ‘housing bubble’ and its aftermath from a multidimensional sociological approach, as opposed to the economic perspective of many popular discussions. This is a phenomenon that has affected numerous economies in the first decade of the new millennium. The discussion is based on a comprehensive study that includes exhaustive analysis of secondary data, content and debate in the mass media and academia, primary data gathered from the monitoring of weblogs and forums debating housing issues, and case histories of individuals experiencing housing difficulties during this period. This paper is intended to provide a broad overview of the key findings and preliminary analysis of this ongoing study, and is informed by a perspective which considers secure and affordable housing to be an essential foundation of stable and cohesive societies, with its absence contributing to a range of social ills that negatively impact on both individual and collective well being. Overall, it is argued that we must return to viewing decent, affordable housing as an essential social resource, that provides the bedrock of stable individual, family and community life, while recognizing that its increasing treatment as a purely economic asset is a key contributor to our so‐called ‘broken society’.     

The Guidance Function of Cases of Misappropriation of Public Funds in Transitional China—With the Reference to Criminal Trial of the Supreme People’s Court of China as a Sample of Analysis

相对于贪污、受贿等传统型腐败犯罪, 挪用公款罪不是常态性罪名, 而是针对社 会转型刑法应对的成果。该罪的立法、司法过程中存在着诸多纠结, 这使得判例参考 的价值凸显。最高人民法院十分重视对该罪判例的公布, 这为现实裁决提供了指导和 参考作用。最近10年所公布挪用公款罪判例折射出司法的重心是: 注重主体身份的实 质公务性、从形式合理性理解“归个人使用”、慎重解释“公款”的内涵。判例公布 在有利于同案同判的同时, 也成为促进理论与实践的助推器。

关键词: 腐败犯罪 挪用公款 社会转型 判例 ?刑事审判参考?

Compared with the traditional offenses of embezzlement, bribe-taking and so on, the misappropriation of public funds is not a routine charge but a result of the response of criminal law to social transition. The fact that a number of difficulties have arisen in legislative and judicial procedures relating to this offense makes the value of case reference material significant. The Supreme People’s Court of China attaches great importance to the publication of cases of misappropriation of public funds, which offer guidance and reference for real-life adjudication. Cases publicized in the last decade reflect a judicial emphasis—they focus on the official nature of the duties performed by the subject, on understanding “for individual use” from the viewpoint of formal rationality and on a cautious interpretation of the connotations of “public funds.” Publicizing such cases facilitates reaching the same verdict in similar cases and at the same time acts as a catalyst for the advancement of theory and practice.     

从《正义论》到《政治自由主义》——罗尔斯的后期政治哲学

作为对各种批评的回应,罗尔斯的后期政治哲学对《正义论》进行了反思和修正。这种反思、修正和回应主要表现在罗尔斯正义理论的三个主要方面:正义原则、原初状态的证明和稳定性问题。     

‘Pains of imprisonment’: narratives of the women partners and children of the incarcerated

This paper focuses on an important line of inquiry in contemporary criminal justice social work research: the collateral consequences of incarceration in the Chinese context. It gives an insight into the impact of incarceration on families from an insider's perspective. An analysis of interviews with 10 partners and 10 children yielded three major themes concerning the impact of imprisonment: the problems associated with the imprisonment of a family member, the coping strategies used and views on the importance of maintaining family ties. It is hoped that this study will give practical guidance regarding what should be done, and how, to reduce the negative consequences brought about by the absence (temporary or permanent) of the imprisoned on their families, including both their partners and vulnerable children.     

龙勃罗梭思想对刑事司法的意义

龙勃罗梭将实证的、归纳的方法引入犯罪研究的领域，引起了犯罪研究领域的一场方法论革命。他提出的犯罪人的多种分类、犯罪的多因论以及犯罪预防和刑罚个别化思想，主张改革监狱制度和刑法体系，这些思想对当今刑事司法制度产生了深刻地影响。     

恢复性司法理念下我国刑事和解制度的构建

国历史上和现代的刑事和解实践无法实现恢复性司法的目标。针对这一问题，运用历史考察和比较研究的方法，对我国刑事和解制度的发展进行了梳理，对我国刑事和解与恢复性司法进行了比较。我国的刑事和解在适用模式、适用范围和结果方面与恢复性司法存在一定的差别。我国刑事和解制度的构建应该以联合国预防犯罪和刑事司法委员会《关于在刑事事项中采用恢复性司法方案的基本原则》为参照，在适用范围、和解结果等方面达到恢复性司法的目标。     

内容出自形式吗——略评哈贝马斯的“对话伦理学”

近代西方"内容出自形式"神话的构建历史,可从康德"绝对命令"开始,直到罗尔斯的"社会契约"论和哈贝马斯的"对话伦理学"。哈氏"对话伦理学"的纯粹形式倾向,体现在"交往的不可避免性,论证性原则,最后根据的问题"等三项基本要义之中。"形式不可能产生内容",因而对哈氏神话必须进行反思和批判,基于经验、内容及人的法权,尝试构建实体论证的程序正义论。