当前世界金融-经济危机的性质及原因——基于理论、历史和现状的比较分析

当前正在世界蔓延的危机是一种特殊的世界金融-经济危机.引起危机的直接原因是金融因素,而不是实体经济因素.具体来说,政府疏于管理的金融衍生品泛滥形成了超长的金融链条;美国实体经济危机的设备投资调整因素尚未成熟;生产与市场的国际间均衡减轻了美国实体经济承受的压力.因此美国次贷危机爆发一年多之后才形成了金融与实体经济共生的经济危机.     

不可扼杀的顽强生命——从当前国际金融危机再论马克思主义命运

由美国次贷危机引发的世界性金融危机以及由金融危机发展而来的经济危机,充分揭示了资本主义制度的寄生性、腐朽性,进一步证明了马克思主义关于资本主义必然灭亡、社会主义必然胜利的结论的科学性,更加证明马克思主义仍然具有强大生命力。主要表现在：资本主义制度无法克服其自身固有矛盾;马克思的经济理论及其巨著《资本论》声誉大振;社会主义社会在曲折中不断前进。     

“资本主义的基本矛盾与经济危机”教学“三部曲”

教学＂三部曲＂即＂讲＂、＂看＂、＂议＂三个教学环节,＂讲＂即导学和精讲,＂看＂即观看视频资料,＂议＂即议论和讨论。三者具有内在的统一性,＂讲＂是＂看＂和＂议＂的基础,是教学过程的根本;＂看＂是＂讲＂的延伸、＂议＂的基础,是教学过程的重要部分;＂议＂是＂讲＂和＂看＂的升华,是教学过程的精髓。在运用＂三部曲＂教学法时,要处理好教学中的普遍性与特殊性的关系,要实现知识传授与思想教育的统一。     

突发公共危机条件下公共物品供给主体的行为特征分析

地震等突发公共危机具有较强烈的破坏性,会导致公共物品的严重短缺,给人民生活和国民经济造成了极大的影响。在公共危机条件下,作为公共物品的供给主体——政府、企业和第三部门等的供给行为受到了很大冲击,严重影响了公共物品供给的效率和可持续性。文章在以上分析的基础上提出了在危机条件下的基于激励机制和监督机制上的以政府供给为主导,企业供给和第三部门供给相互支撑的多维框架下的多中心的供给新模式。     

中国证券公司核心竞争力的内涵与评估——基于美国金融危机的反思

美国金融危机中投资银行普遍经营失败的深刻启示在于:核心竞争力中风险控制和承受能力最重要;核心竞争力的评估和培育必须坚持长期视角.提高证券公司核心竞争力的关键在于培养保障企业稳定盈利和成长并保持一定市场竞争优势的能力,这种能力必须植根于企业良好的治理结构和优秀的企业文化.论文分别建立了中固证券公司核心竞争力的理论指标体系和实证评估指标体系,运用因子分析法对31家中国证券公司竞争力进行综合评价.研究发现:样本公司核心竞争力不强;行业内出现明显分化;市场份顿年均增长、总资产利润率和净资本等指标对核心竞争力的估值有重要影响.     

Issue management and crisis management: An integrated,non-linear,relational construct

Despite extensive attempts to define and differentiate issue management and crisis management, the definitional approach – and linear life-cycle models which focus on the elements – fail to capture the full dynamics of the disciplines. Instead of a focus on definitions, this paper proposes a non-linear, relational construct which considers issue and crisis management in the context of interdependent activities and clusters of activity which must be managed at different stages. This includes the role of issue management in both the pre-crisis and post-crisis phases. The model addresses some of the limitations of linear approaches and helps analyze the outcomes and overlaps between activity clusters in order to optimize strategic relationships and enhance bottom-line effectiveness.     

企业危机管理存在的问题及改进措施

进入新世纪，尽管我国企业进入了飞速发展的阶段，然而由于企业所面对的环境不确定性大幅度提高，市场需求瞬息万变，再加上科学技术的迅速发展，使市场的变动起伏加大，经济周期变短，企业的危机增大，稍不留意就会失去自己的市场份额，所以加强企业的危机管理就至关重要。本文在对企业危机管理中存在的问题进行分析的基础上，对企业的危机管理提出了相应的改进措施和建议，以便为企业的危机管理提供现实指导。     

Navigating the COVID-19 pandemic in the contingency framework: Antecedents and consequences of public’s stance toward the CDC

This study applied the contingency theory of conflict management to examine how contingency factors influence the public’s perceptual and behavioral responses to COVID-19 and stance toward the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In particular, we tested political ideology as an important individual characteristic variable to examine its roles in the contingency theory framework. The findings revealed that two situational variables (i.e., threat appraisal and attitudes toward CDC) positively influenced the public’s contingency accommodation stance toward the CDC. Furthermore, greater conservatism was significantly associated with lower levels of threat appraisal and more negative attitudes toward the CDC, however it did not influence the stance toward the CDC. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings and directions for future research are discussed.     

Finding the path beyond reputation repair: A structural topic modeling analysis of the crisis communication paradigm in public relations

This research utilizes computational methods to examine crisis communication scholarship from 2010 to 2020 in two studies with a census of all articles in Public Relations Review and the Journal of Public Relations Research (n = 1293 articles, 7400,685 words). Results indicate crisis scholarship has expanded beyond its prior focus on reputation repair. Situational crisis communication theory and image repair are compared in volume of scholarship and methodological affinity. Social media, SCCT, and media relations are identified as central topics within crisis communication scholarship.     

Warranted inferences of mediation and possibility of a threshold effect: Verifying the mediating effects of anger in situational crisis communication theory

Scholars have called for communication research to verify the causal claims of mediation models from a research design perspective, instead of only proving mediation statistically. This study validates whether and how anger mediates the causal effects of crisis types on publics’ responses in Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT), including reputation, negative word-of-mouth intention, and purchase intention in China. Two experiments were conducted based on the experimental-causal-chain design. Results in Study 1 demonstrate that the causal relationships between three crisis types and publics’ emotional and other responses in China are consistent with findings in Western contexts. In Study 2, the results of a 2 (anger: low, high) x 3 (crisis types: victim crisis, accidental crisis, preventable crisis) factorial experiment reveal significant mediating effects of anger on publics’ responses in the victim and accidental crisis conditions, but not for preventable crises. This novel finding suggests the possibility of a threshold effect of anger in the mediating process. Specifically, anger has a mediating effect on publics’ responses when it is below the high-anger threshold. However, anger may no longer be the mediator when it exceeds this threshold. This finding empirically challenges the common assumption that emotions have a linear relationship with publics’ responses, thus offering a new research avenue and deeper understanding of how emotions function in crises. Therefore, this research serves as a pioneer, calling for future studies to validate other theories involving mediation to yield fruitful insights.