关于改革开放30年的几点思考

中国改革开放30年取得的成绩举世瞩目,在实践中坚决纠正了“文化大革命”的错误,成功探索了中国特色社会主义建设的新道路;在理论上重新恢复了马列主义毛泽东思想的指导地位,形成了“中国特色社会主义理论体系”,在改革开放的进程中,还需要进一步明确思想解放的重点指向,明确任何时候解放思想都不能脱离实事求是的轨道。     

试论马克思主义哲学的辩证本体论

马克思主义哲学包含丰富的唯物辩证的本体论思想,是一种辩证本体论。其中,物质本体论是马克思主义哲学的基础本体论,其宗旨是先行地澄明世界的一般前提和基础;人学本体论是马克思主义哲学的主体本体论、其宗旨是先行地澄明马克思主义哲学研究的核心和主题;实践本体论是马克思主义哲学的逻辑本体论,其宗旨是先行地澄明人类社会历史活动的一般前提和基础;社会存在本体论是马克思主义哲学的结构本体论,其宗旨是先行地澄明人类社会历史的一般本质和特征。     

辩证法在东、西方发展的不同命运——兼谈哲学研究中的方法论问题

我们在辩证法研究中之所以出现种种困惑,就在于没有从范式的高度去看待东西方的研究成果。东西方学者的研究可以概括为两个范式＂：研究马恩辩证法之间关系＂的范式和＂关注辩证法应用＂的范式。这两种范式的形成,既与东西方学者的研究方式有关,又与西方人重视＂正的方法＂,中国人重视＂负的方法＂等文化传统相联系。在借鉴西方学者研究成果时,态度要非常慎重,要注意现成结论背后的研究方式与文化传统的差异。     

多一些辨证思维--古代小说作家生平研究刍议

研究古代小说作家生平籍贯,必须坚持实事求是、辨证思维.根据作品中的地理描写来考证作者籍贯,必须注意作者籍贯与其实际生活地区常常并不一致;有些地理错误,系因照顾情节需要所致;部分地理错误属于传抄、刊刻之误,与作者本人无关,更不能作为判断作者籍贯的依据.作品使用方言的问题非常复杂,根据方言来判断作者是非常困难的,以往已有若干失误的教训,对此必须十分谨慎.对民间传说与古代小说的关系,应持科学的分析态度,不宜将传说当作考证历史人物生平籍贯的依据.     

孙子思维的整体性辩证性跳跃性——对《孙子兵法》文义多处重述原因的探索

《孙子兵法》的文义多处重出 ,有的认为是重复 ,有的认为是错简。本文认为应该从孙子思维的整体性、辩证性与跳跃性等思维特征来寻求其重述的原因 ,不是简单的重复或错简 ,而是另有新意。     

从《启蒙辩证法》看霍克海默的真理观

以霍克海默的《启蒙辩证法》为主要依据,参证其他著述,并结合时代语境来梳理霍克海默的真理观,旨在揭示出霍氏真理观的否定神学背景及其时代意义。     

When ‘political demand’ meets ‘video-politics’

ABSTRACT

The emergence of a ‘macro-personification of politics’ within the political field of Aotearoa New Zealand alters the manner by which political demand needs to now operate if it is to succeed as a form of tactical strategy in political activism. A particular analytical initiative is identified as being central to success under these conditions, whereby given political demands enlarge from a ‘state of singularity’ to become ‘complex discursive demands’. Key to that initiative is the ‘dialectic of appearances’ and the ‘labour of the negative’ associated with the ideas-work of Hegel. This article identifies how this dynamic was playing out within a key event in the anti-surveillance movement of 2013, the August public rally in the Auckland Town Hall.     

Explicating the public memory dialectic in public relations: The case of Donald Trump,The Oath Keepers,and January 6, 2021

The public relations practice participates in making, shaping, telling, and interpreting societal memory to influence issue positions and related actions. That claim implies several themes. One, societal memory is a useful concept for understanding the strategic processes of meaning and meaning making, narratives which constitute society. Two, the content of their prevailing memories shapes the choices individuals make separately and collectively. Public relations’ centrality to societal memory remains an underappreciated and underexplored research area. Scholars have explored the role public relations plays in societal memory by examining, for instance, the textuality of art as well as memorials and statues, their erection and erasure. To better understand this process, scholarship needs to examine strategic public relations efforts to “blur” societal memory as a means of creating alternative versions (revisionist history) of lived truth, values, norms, and policies. After examining memory, including blurring, we use the January 6, 2021 United States presidential election (Congressional Certification) Capitol “protest event” to demonstrate how blurring occurs and its potential adverse implications. We suggest and conceptualize in a model that societal memory occurs as a dialectic; some etched version of history (i.e., thesis) comes under question (i.e., antithesis), and through either a process of blurring, erasure, or retention, that etched history is then muddied, expunged, or lives on (i.e., synthesis). Meaning matters in the enactment and critical assessment of public relations’ role in societal agency.