解构传统的80年代女性主义诗歌

女性主义诗歌在 2 0世纪 80年代中期以“躯体诗学”对舒婷一代的替代 ,完成了性别意识的艰难蝉蜕与确证。它从女性隐秘的生理心理经验、性行为欲望和死亡意识三个向度上进行的黑夜意识笼罩下的躯体叙述 ,在冲击传统理性文学的同时找到了自己的精神空间。它在艺术上多采用自白方式制造强烈的叙述氛围 ,使语言结构日趋情绪化和弥散化。这种创作改变了女性被书写的命运 ,扩大了女性解放的内涵 ,但也存在着高度私语化、自动迷狂等误区     

论股份合作改革中“性别化”的土地权利——基于女性主义视角的研究个案

随着农村土地股份合作改革的推进,妇女个体的合法权益屡屡遭到剥夺。从女性主义视角来看,"农嫁女"的合法土地权利受侵,属于公共行政管理问题,而非单一的妇女问题。它不仅侵害了妇女的合法权利和身心健康,也对国家推行城乡一体化改革形成强大阻力。明确并完善农村集体组织成员资格的界定标准和操作规则,保障弱势妇女群体参与村民自治,强化推行性别平等的村规民约修订,弱化农村传统的社会性别偏好,有助于应对这一问题。     

西方性别理论话语中的女性问题研究——以马克思异化理论为视角

女性在社会发展进程中扮演着重要的角色,同时女性面临的各种问题一直以来也备受社会关注。西方女性主义马克思主义者借鉴了马克思的异化理论,并将其运用于家庭和私人生活领域,创造性地提出了性别异化理论。她们认为,当代社会女性异化表现在两性关系领域、家务劳动领域、心理和精神智力领域等。而消除异化实现女性解放需要通过消除性别角色、提高女性经济地位、扩大女性政治参与权等途径来实现。她们的探索为人们理解两性问题、实现性别和谐发展提供了有益的理论借鉴与指导。     

当代女性主义伦理学的理论旨趣探究

女性主义伦理学是当代伦理学中反主流规范伦理学中的一支.它将女性身份作为反思西方社会生活的一个符号代码,试图以性别分析方法剖析伦理学领域内性别权力的运作,以结束使女性受压迫的伦理意识和谋划,达到更合理的对伦理道德的理解.同时它批判了规范伦理学的普遍主义理论体系与论证方式,质疑了主流伦理理论的基本预设与价值建构.女性主义伦理学探究是一个正在进行的过程,当代伦理学多元化发展的潮流中,女性主义的探究为伦理学的发展提供了更大空间.     

女性主义女体书写的误读——从当代中国大众文化的身体话语谈起

女性主义身体理论认为女性身体是差异和同一性集中表现的场所,女性主义身体写作意在体现女性本真体验和主流身体意向的冲突中生存的紧张状态。兴起于上世纪90年代中国的女体文艺继承了中国女体艺术历史中将女体客体化的话语结构,并汇入现代性身体书写传统的解放话语体系,从而与男性中心话语“合谋”,将女性女体进一步客体化,将其归入女性主义身体书写是一种误读,女性主义身体书写应牢牢把握住女性本真的体验这一基本要点方才能达到真正的女性表达和女性话语。     

女权运动同盟会与中共妇女运动统一战线的初步尝试

1922年8月，北京女权运动同盟会成立，随后浙江、上海、天津、南京、山东、湖北等地相继成立，其主要活动为女权宣传、女权请愿、于民权运动中争女权，如参加取消治安警察法运动、裁兵运动、声援工人罢工、支持学生运动等，同时还致力于女工保护、争取男女教育平等、参加国民会议运动等，其斗争锋芒直指封建伦理道德和军阀统治。女权运动同盟会是中国共产党妇女运动统一战线的初步尝试，中国共产党和社会主义青年团的指导和影响贯穿女权运动同盟会发起、成立、发展的全过程。女权运动同盟会在唤起妇女觉醒，影响社会舆论、引导妇女群众贯彻民主政治等方面都有一定的积极意义。     

On the consequences of scarcity mindset: How ‘having too little’ means so much for ethnic venture failure

Drawing on the psychological concept of scarcity mindset as a lens, we explore UK-based ethnic entrepreneurs' accounts of their behaviors and choices to theorize ethnic business venture failure. Our findings suggest the constraints of ‘having too little’ entrepreneurial resources can induce three organizing tensions in organizing, community embeddedness, spatial and segment spawning, and dispositional optimism––which may operate in combination or serially to precipitate ethnic venture failure. Our findings contribute to research on conflicting demands in entrepreneurship by showing how resource constraints, sometimes played out in the form of enduring inequalities within markets and society-at-large stymies the conversion of contradictory yet mutually constituting demands in organizing into potentially productive outcomes.     

Navigating midwifery solidarity: A feminist participatory action research framework

BackgroundA core aspect of midwifery philosophy is the optimisation of normal physiology; however, this has been challenged as a radical idea in the medicalisation of birth. Research has demonstrated the benefits of midwifery in improving outcomes for both mothers and babies. The understanding of midwifery benefits fails to reach wider sociocultural contexts as births becomes more medicalised. Midwifery research requires an action arm, to help translate theory to practice and mobilise midwives in solidarity with women towards action and change.AimThe aim of this article is to describe a Feminist Participatory Action Research (FPAR) by establishing the philosophical underpinnings, theory and methodology with an exemplar.MethodsFPAR has two distinct yet intertwined parts, a research arm and an action arm. The study was conducted using FPAR, and collaboration with nine women, who led transformative action within their community. The exemplar details the use of the FPAR framework.FindingsA FPAR framework was developed through this research to guide researchers aiming to use the FPAR design. The framework details four steps: 1. Create, 2. Collaborate, 3. Consider, and 4. Change. The iterative FPAR cycles were shown in this study to centre women in the research and guide the community research group towards transformative action.ConclusionFPAR is shown in this project to assist midwifery researchers to realise solidarity and provides support for other midwifery researchers in applying feminist theory and participatory methodologies to bring about transformation within their research.     

From strangers to social collectives? Sensemaking and organizing in response to a pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic temporarily exposed the inadequacy of established institutions and markets to handle a multidimensional crisis, but it also revealed the spontaneous emergence of social collectives to mitigate some of its consequences. Building upon more than 600 responses from an open-ended survey and follow-up qualitative interviews, we seek to understand the spontaneous formation of social collectives in neighborhoods during the initial global lockdown. Applying the sensemaking lens, we theorize the process that prevented the collapse of sensemaking; motivated neighbors to comply with the pandemic-related restrictions; and inspired the development of collective initiatives and the sharing of resources, experiences, and a feeling of belonging. In doing so, we identify mechanisms that allow distributed sensemaking and organizing for resilience: widely shared and accepted cues and frames, simultaneous enactment of practices, embeddedness, visibility of actions, and sense of community. Contrary to the literature on local community organizing and entrepreneurship, which emphasizes the importance of shared values and beliefs, we reveal how the abovementioned mechanisms enable social collectives to emerge and build resilience in times of crisis, even in the absence of pre-existing ties and physical and social isolation. Implications for sensemaking, resilience, organization studies, and community psychology are discussed.