组合评价方法的相对有效性分析及应用

Although it is an etfctive method for combination evaluation to solve the inconsistency from dif ferent evaluation conlcusions,different results will still be caused汕en adopting different combination evaluation methods,and this is a new inconsistency.On the basis of introducing the definition of validity and four assumptions,the paper shows an idea comparing different combination evaluation methods.validity through an example,and provides a way to solve the new inconsistency mentioned above.     

管理理论与实践脱节的界定依据、深层原因及解决思路

用归纳推理法、演绎推理法和矛盾分析法等方法,从理论的来源与去向、应用链、实践者感知、时空适用性4个方面提出了界定脱节的依据,深入分析了导致脱节的外因与内因,提出并论证了"管理学应用链偏长"、"管理学研究者客户迷失"、"存在价值与替代价值两维评价"、"引用者、读者、使用者三类指标"等重要论断.     

基于协调发展度的重大工程团队免疫系统健康评价研究

为评价重大工程团队免疫系统的健康和协调发展状况,本文提出了一种基于协调发展度的评价模型。首先通过文献查询和深度访谈,构建能够体现重大工程团队免疫系统特征的健康评价指标体系;其次利用改进的DEMATEL确定指标权重,然后采用多层次模糊综合评价将相关指标定量化,最终得出重大工程团队免疫系统的健康指数和协调发展度;再次确立重大工程团队免疫系统健康等级和协调发展度划分标准,同时提出免疫系统健康的跟踪评价策略;最后,利用本文模型对某跨国输气管道工程团队的免疫系统进行实证研究。结果表明,协调发展度模型既能反映重大工程团队免疫系统的整体健康程度,又能衡量固有性免疫和适应性免疫的协调发展状况,同时对免疫系统健康的跟踪评价也取得了良好效果。     

Impact of competitive conditions on supplier evaluation: a construction supply chain case study

This research proposes a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework and demonstrates the impact of competitive conditions on supplier evaluation process for construction supply chains. The paper focuses on the supply chain of a large-scale housing project in order to illustrate the role of competitive capability and suppliers’ profile and its influence on supplier evaluation based on prevailing supply/market conditions. Various scenarios are investigated to demonstrate the impact of competition on supplier evaluation. The contribution of the study lies in highlighting the impact of supply/market conditions on MCDM decisions causing supplier evaluation ‘imbalance’ and MCDM usage. It is expected that the study will be useful for project management, construction, supply chain management, sourcing professionals. The findings of the study are generalisable to projects-based situations such as petroleum refinery and ship building where bill of materials typically consists of thousands of items and a large number of suppliers are involved.     

Is white always the standard? Using replication to revisit and extend what we know about the leadership prototype

This research is a pre-registered replication of Rosette, Leonardelli, and Phillips' (2008) seminal work in leadership categorization theory. Their work established race as a component to the business leader prototype and found evidence that when a leader was given credit for successful organizational performance, White leaders were evaluated more favorably than non-White leaders. As leadership exemplars are evolving, however, a need to reexamine these relationships has emerged. Results from our replications of their first and third studies showed minimal support for the argument that being White is a component of the business leader prototype. Additionally, across six separate studies, we found no conditions in which White leaders received more favorable evaluations than their non-White counterparts. Contrary to our expectations, we found that non-White leaders received marginally more favorable ratings than White leaders in four of our studies.     

非实验数据政策效应评估理论与实证研究方法

非实验数据政策效应的研究是管理科学研究中的一个重要方向。政策效应评估理论在国外研究发展已经有很多年历史,但国内这一领域的研究甚少。基于此,本文对政策效应评估理论和实证研究方法做了一个较为全面的概括,侧重介绍了目前常用的三种评估方法:选择修正法、DID法和匹配法,并就一些我们在实际问题处理过程中需要注意的问题进行了探讨。     

东方系统方法论指导项目评价实践：科学性与艺术性的结合

针对西方评价方法论缺少系统性与灵活性的特点,提出东方系统方法论指导项目评价活动的理念。通过分析东方系统方法论对于项目评价实践的适应性,构建了项目评价决策概念模型和项目评价全过程模型,并以“知物理、明事理、通人理”为指导思想对项目评价全过程进行了系统分析。     

基于元网络分析的重大基础设施建设项目风险评估框架与实证

重大基础设施项目具有战略性、集成性、复杂性等特征，项目容易受到多种风险因素的综合影响，导致项目目标的偏离。现有风险评估与风险决策的方法缺乏对于风险因素、风险事件之间关联的分析。为了实现重大基础设施建设项目综合系统的风险评估，本文采用元网络分析方法，构建项目目标、风险事件和风险因素的交互模型，揭示重大基础设施风险事件发生机制的黑箱过程。风险评估过程中，通过多个网络叠加运算分析每个风险因素对于各种风险事件以及项目各目标的影响情况，改进了以往仅对风险因素单一影响程度的风险评估方法。同时，本研究选择我国某河流水电站过坝运输项目方案比选的风险评估过程验证方法的适用性。     

基于理想解和灰关联度的动态评价方法及其应用研究

为了对多个多属性（指标）待评价对象（方案）在多个时间点的发展状态和该时间段内的总体发展水平进行比较分析,根据理想解法和灰关联度法优缺点,提出基于理想解和灰关联度的动态评价方法。该方法基于三维数据,将欧氏距离和灰色关联度相结合,提出一种新贴近度,同时反映了位置关系和数据曲线的相似性差异,兼顾评价指标值差异程度和增长程度。最后将该方法应用于"十二五"期间省域循环经济生态效益评价,通过实例验证该方法实际应用上的有效性。     

Quality Risk Ratings in Global Supply Chains

Extended enterprises face many challenges in managing the product quality of their suppliers. Consequently characterizing the quality risk posed by value‐chain partners has become increasingly important. There have been several recent efforts to develop frameworks for rating the quality risk posed by suppliers. We develop an analytical model to examine the impact of such quality ratings on suppliers, manufacturers, and social welfare. While it might seem that quality ratings would benefit high‐quality suppliers and hurt low‐quality suppliers, we show that this is not always the case. We find that such quality ratings can hurt both types of suppliers or benefit both, depending on the market conditions. We also find that quality ratings do not always benefit the most demanding manufacturers who desire high‐quality suppliers. Finally, we find that social welfare is not always improved by risk ratings. These results suggest that public policy initiatives addressing risk ratings must be carefully considered.