对两权分离改革范式的十大实证性批判

两权分离改革范式的根本错误 ,不仅在于理论上缺乏行为分析性 ,更在于在实践中所引发的众多难题 :颠倒了自然人产权奠定法人产权的历史关系 ;没有解决国企所有者缺位的核心问题 ;延误了我国非国有企业的制度建设与全面成长的历史机遇 ;违背了世界经济发展的历史事实和基本趋势 ;没有彻底触动政治体制 ;没有解决不合理的社会关系 ;增大了我国制度变迁与经济发展的交易费用 ,没有解决国企企业家成长的制度问题 ;导致经济发展中短期化行为放大 ;社会资产缺乏理性投向。两权分离改革范式导致中国至今的经济改革走样 ,给经济发展带来现实与潜在的巨大危机与困难     

立足服务 改革基层人口计划管理机制

基层人口计划是各级人口计划的基础 ,也是落实人口计划时的执行计划 ,它直接影响到家家户户。现行基层人口计划的管理措施中 ,有些地方亟待完善。改革现行基层人口计划管理机制 ,让群众自愿选择生育时间已成为计划生育工作发展的必然要求     

Communicating future water needs to an at-risk population: lessons learned following defeat of the Applewhite Dam and Reservoir Project in San Antonio,Texas

San Antonio, Texas, the seventh largest city in the United States, has experienced steady population growth, since the “boom” of the 1960s. Projected water shortages due to this growth were realized as early as the 1970s by city leaders and south-central Texas regional development decision makers. To reduce dependence on the already over-taxed, Edwards aquifer, a solution, the Applewhite Dam and Reservoir Project, was developed with wide acceptance by federal, state, and city leaders who regarded the project as a necessary measure for regional growth and development. However, opposition by taxpayer and environmental groups led to referendums of 1991 and 1994 in which voters blocked construction of the dam and reservoir leaving the city with limited options for water provision. This case study investigated the factors which led to a clear mismatch in communication between decision makers—those who were aware of the actual and quantifiable risk to the region in terms of reduced water supplies—and the general public, a population that did not have complete and/or adequate knowledge of their actual risk regarding future water shortages, nor, of solutions being developed, such as the Applewhite project. The findings from this case study indicate that when municipal leadership fails to adequately communicate risk regarding resource shortage to an affected public, as well as, openly planned solutions, that voters are likely to underestimate future impacts of water shortages, heed last-minute opposition, and reject long-standing, publicly proposed projects. The intent of this research is not to support either side in the Applewhite controversy, but to shed perspective on the process of adequately and effectively communicating future water needs to an at-risk population. Decision makers in cities across the United States who are faced with solving problems of limited resources needed by a large populace may be informed by the results of this research.     

地方政府土地管理模式更新——农民参与的视角

土地可持续发展是科学发展观的一项重要内容.作为与土地有着最为直接利益关系的农民,其参与土地管理决策不仅合情合理,而且对于维护自身利益和土地可持续发展具有双重意义.然而,当前地方政府土地管理模式中却存在着农民参与有效性不高的问题,这既损害了农民的合法权益,也对土地可持续发展造成负面影响.这一问题的解决需要地方政府进行土地管理模式的更新,即通过制度创新吸纳农民参与到土地管理决策中来.     

企业的伦理需要分析

在企业需要层次理论基础上,对企业的伦理需要进行了经济学分析、管理学分析及实证分析,对伦理与制度的相关性进行了讨论。研究表明:伦理既是制度的基础又具有比制度更高的价值追求,而制度是伦理的保障。伦理需要是企业内生的基本需要,是企业文化的核心和企业凝聚力的来源。     

论我国金融类国有资产出资人制度的构建——以国有商业银行为中心

国有金融类资产运管理体制是国有金融资本运营方式创新和微观金融主体重组、经营的基础性环境。我国国有金融类资产管理体制在现行变革的基础上,应由国有资产监督管理委员会统一作为金融类资产的出资人代表,中央汇金有限责任公司作为中间层的国有资本运营主体。并辅之以相关的监管措施,即国有资本预算监管、独立监管。     

风险，创新激励政策中被忽视的关键要素

创新是经济持续增长的核心动力,鼓励创新是各国国家创新战略的关键.现行的创新相关政策忽视了如何从风险管理的角度,系统地控制和分散从事创新活动的参与者所面临的风险.本文试图从这个被人忽视的视角,探讨如何鼓励人们进行自主创新的逻辑框架;并对相关理论研究假设进行了实证检验,以期为政府决策者提供新思路.     

国企改革中MBO的实践及思考

在我国各地深化国有企业产权制度改革的实践中,管理层收购(MBO)被付诸大胆的尝试。尽管市场机制不完善、法律环境欠缺,MBO仍由默默无闻的个别行动发展而成近年大规模涌现、并引发理论界、政府及公众热切关注和争论不休的态势。     

基于分位点回归模型的条件VaR估计以及杠杆效应分析

 在文献中,分析杠杆效应时大多数都是基于ARCH类模型,本文应用分位点回归模型及其变点检测模型分析了“已实现”波动率条件下的CVaR,并尝试从CVaR的角度对杠杆效应进行分析。最后,对中国股票市场进行了实证研究,得到了“已实现”波动率条件下的CVaR估计,并对中国股市的杠杆效应进行了分析。     

Involvement of Ministries of Health in Health Service Coverage Decisions: Is England an Aberrant Case?

This article examines the involvement of ministries of health in making health service coverage decisions in Denmark, England, France and Germany. The study aims to inform debate in England about the feasibility of reducing perceived ministerial and bureaucratic ‘interference’ in decisions affecting the National Health Service, based on interviews with senior government officials and other health system stakeholders. Ministries of health differ in their involvement in health system governance and coverage decisions (‘the benefits package’), reflecting differences in institutional arrangements. In all four countries, organizations at arm's length or independent from government are either involved in providing technical advice to the ministry of health or have been mandated to take these decisions themselves. However, ministries of health occasionally intervene in the decision‐making process or ignore the advice of these organizations. The Department of Health in England is not an aberrant case, at least in relation to coverage decisions. Indeed, ministries of health in Denmark and France play a larger role in making these decisions. Public pressure, often amplified by the media, is a shared reason for ministerial and ministry involvement in all four countries. This dynamic may thus limit the feasibility of attempts to further separate the NHS from both the Department of Health and wider political pressures.