Tables for pairwise multiple comparisons using shaffer's modifiedsequentially-rejective procedure

A sequentially rejective (SR) testing procedure introduced by Holm (1979) and modified (MSR) by Shaffer (1986) is considered for testing all pairwise mean comparisons.For such comparisons, both the SR and MSR methods require that the observed test statistics be ordered and compared, each in turn, to appropriate percentiles on Student's t distribution.For the MSR method these percentiles are based on the maximum number of true null hypotheses remaining at each stage of the sequential procedure, given prior significance at previous stages, A function is developed for determining this number from the number of means being tested and the stage of the test.For a test of all pairwise comparisons, the logical implications which follow the rejection of a null hypothesis renders the MSR procedure uniformly more powerful than the SR procedure.Tables of percentiles for comparing K means, 3 < K < 6, using the MSR method are presented.These tables use Sidak's (1967) multiplicative inequality and simplify the use of t he MSR procedure.Several modifications to the MSR are suggested as a means of further increasing the power for testing the pairwise comparisons.General use of the MSR and the corresponding function for testing other parameters besides the mean is discussed.     

Power Loss for Inhomogeneous Poisson Processes

In this work, based on a realization of an inhomogeneous Poisson process whose intensity function depends on a real parameter, we consider a simple null hypothesis against the composite one sided alternative. Under certain regularity conditions we will obtain the power loss of the score test which measures its performance with respect to the Neyman-Pearson test. We present the second-order approximation of the power of the score test under the close alternatives by specifying the explicit form of the next term after the Gaussian term.     

Cointegration: Bayesian Significance Test

To estimate causal relationships, time series econometricians must be aware of spurious correlation, a problem first mentioned by Yule (1926 Yule , G. U. ( 1926 ). Why we do sometimes get nonsense-correlations between time-series? A study in sampling and the nature of time-series (with discussion) . J. Roy. Statist. Soc. 89 : 1 – 64 .[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]). To deal with this problem, one can work either with differenced series or multivariate models: VAR (VEC or VECM) models. These models usually include at least one cointegration relation. Although the Bayesian literature on VAR/VEC is quite advanced, Bauwens et al. (1999 Bauwens , L. , Lubrano , M. , Richard , J.-F. ( 1999 ). Bayesian Inference in Dynamic Econometric Models . Oxford : Oxford University Press . [Google Scholar]) highlighted that “the topic of selecting the cointegrating rank has not yet given very useful and convincing results”.

The present article applies the Full Bayesian Significance Test (FBST), especially designed to deal with sharp hypotheses, to cointegration rank selection tests in VECM time series models. It shows the FBST implementation using both simulated and available (in the literature) data sets. As illustration, standard non informative priors are used.     

Evaluation of a Frequentist Hierarchical Model to Estimate Prevalence When Sampling from a Large Geographic Area Using Pool Screening

We present a frequentist Bernoulli-Beta hierarchical model to relax the constant prevalence assumption underlying the traditional prevalence estimation approach based on pooled data. This assumption is called into question when sampling from a large geographic area. Pool screening is a method that combines individual items into pools. Each pool will either test positive (at least one of the items is positive) or negative (all items are negative). Pool screening is commonly applied to the study of tropical diseases where pools consist of vectors (e.g., black flies) that can transmit the disease. The goal is to estimate the proportion of infected vectors.

Intermediate estimators (model parameters) and estimators of ultimate interest (pertaining to prevalence) are evaluated by standard measures of merit, such as bias, variance, and mean squared error making extensive use of expansions. Using the hierarchical model an investigator can determine the probability of the prevalence being below a pre-specified threshold value, a value at which no reemergence of the disease is expected. An investigation into the least biased choice of the α parameter in the Beta (α, β) prevalence distribution leads to the choice of α = 1.     

A Positive False Discovery Rate Convergence Result

The positive false discovery rate (pFDR) is the average proportion of false rejections given that the overall number of rejections is greater than zero. Assuming that the proportion of true null hypotheses, proportion of false positives, and proportion of true positives all converge pointwise, the pFDR converges to a continuous limit uniformly over all significance levels. We are showing that the uniform convergence still holds given a weaker assumption that the proportion of true positives converges in L ¹.     

基于DNA遗传算法的表面贴装生产线负荷优化分配

印制电路板组装任务的负荷优化分配包含设备约束、工艺约束等大量约束,是电子行业表面贴装生产线中的一类重要优化问题。其优化目标是在生产节拍给定和一定约束条件下,使得不同贴装机负荷均衡,任务分配达到最优。首先,根据不同表面贴装机、不同吸嘴及多种类型元件匹配的的复杂性,提出贴装机任务分配组合优化的问题;然后分析设备和元件的参数、组装可行性、贴装时间,以及贴装优化关系等因素,并提出假设条件,建立了平衡率最大化条件下的负荷分配组合优化的数学模型;最后,针对贴装生产线负荷分配问题的复杂性与特殊性,通过改良编码方式后的DNA遗传算法来优化组合数学模型,计算适应度,并借助MATLAB进行仿真求解,进而找到最优解。结果表明：本文提出的贴装生产线负荷分配方法可以解决带复杂约束的印制电路板组装负荷优化分配问题,提高设备的平衡率和生产效率,促进生产线的优化运行。     

基于持续运营机会约束的竞争设施点选址研究——一种有效的实数编码遗传求解算法

竞争设施点选址是空间经济、区域发展、组合优化和系统工程的重要课题之一。本文以市场份额最大化为目标,研究了基于持续运营机会约束的竞争设施点选址问题,并给出了一种有效的实数编码遗传求解算法。在求解模型方面,首先假定运营成本是竞争设施点规模大小的函数,并对设施点持续运营概率进行机会约束,借鉴引力模型建立竞争设施点选址-设计问题的非线性混合整数规划模型。其次,考虑到选址变量和规模变量的数值类型,以及编码变换问题,设计了一种实数编码遗传求解算法。通过数值实验表明,对不同规模问题的实际计算结果,该算法可以在较短时间内获得最优解,可行解和精确解之间误差小于0.5%,相关比较分析也讨论了该算法的优越性和实用性,为竞争设施点选址问题的研究提供了不同的视角和实用求解算法。     

Input Variable Selection in Neural Network Models

One of the most important issues in using neural networks for the analysis of real-world problems is the input variable selection problem. This article connects input variable selection with multiple testing in the neural network regression models. In the proposed procedure, the number and the type of input neurons are selected by means of a testing scheme, based on appropriate measures of relevance of a given input variable to the model. In order to avoid the data snooping problem, family-wise error rate is controlled by using the StepM method proposed by Romano and Wolf (2005 Romano , J. P. , Wolf , M. ( 2005 ). Exact and approximate stepdown methods for multiple hypothesis testing . J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 100 : 94 – 108 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). The testing procedure is calibrated by using the subsampling, which is shown to deliver consistent results under weak assumptions on the data generating process and on the structure of the neural network model.