理想认知模型视阈下的误解成因分析及消减策略

误解，在生活中时有发生，轻则令人不快，重则造成严重的人际冲突。语言学家、社会学家、心理学家都试图揭示误解成因。但遗憾的是，这些研究都没有从交际过程出发来探讨误解成因。文章借助于Lakoff的理想认知模型，对误解成因进行充分描述和系统分析并给出误解的消减策略。     

关于建立我国高校实验设备淘汰机制的探讨

目前我国尚未建立高校实验设备强制淘汰制度,由于没有制度约束,很多高校的实验设备运行状态已大大落后于科学技术发展和实验教学需要,本文结合目前我国高校实验设备运行状况,提出了建立我国高校实验设备强制淘汰机制的思路。     

赔礼道歉与消除影响的适用研究——以1999-2015年互联网不正当竞争案件判决书为样本

实证考察中国1999—2015年的互联网不正当竞争案件判决书发现，以最高人民法院为代表的司法机关在适用赔礼道歉、消除影响时比较混乱，存在请求主体不统一、适用条件及适用逻辑未厘清等问题。其重要原因是二者功能定位仍存困惑，且相关立法或空白、或不一致。为解决这两种责任形式适用混乱的问题，应重新界定赔礼道歉、消除影响的适用目的，并从请求主体、适用范围、适用限度及适用边界等多方面予以制度化，从而有效回应互联网竞争主体的正当诉求，规范互联网市场竞争秩序。     

Lean and green in the transport and logistics sector – a case study of simultaneous deployment

The transport and logistics sector is of vital importance for the stimulation of trade and hence the economic development of nations. However, over the last few years, this sector has taken central stage in the green agenda due to the negative environmental effects derived from its operations. Several disciplines including operations research and sub-areas of supply chain management such as green supply chains, green logistics and reverse logistics have tried to address this problem. However, despite the work undertaken through these disciplines, theoretical or empirical research into the sequential or simultaneous deployment of the lean and green paradigms, particularly, in the road transport and logistics sector is limited. This paper presents a case study where both paradigms have been combined to improve the transport operations of a world leader logistics organisation in the metropolitan area of Monterrey, Mexico. To do this, a systematic methodology and a novel tool called Sustainable Transportation Value Stream Map (STVSM) were proposed. The results obtained from the case study indicate that the concurrent deployment of the green and lean paradigms through such methodology and the STVSM tool is an effective approach to improve both operational efficiency and environmental performance of road transport operations. The paper can be used as a guiding reference for transport and logistics organisations to undertake improvement projects similar to the one presented in this paper. Additionally, this research also intends to stimulate scholarly research into the application of lean and green paradigms in the transport and logistics sector to expand the limited research pursued in this area.     

Estimating time to steady state using the effective rate of drug accumulation

Unless all of a drug is eliminated during each dosing interval, the plasma concentrations within a dosing interval will increase until the time course of change in plasma concentrations becomes invariant from one dosing interval to the next, resulting in steady state. A simple method for estimating drug concentration time to steady state based on multiple dose area under the plasma concentration–time curve and effective rate of drug accumulation is presented. Several point estimates and confidence intervals for time to 90% of steady state are compared, and a recommendation is made on how to summarize and present the results. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

基于交叉口冲突消除的区域疏散交通管理研究——以长春市中心区疏散交通管理为例

针对非常规突发事件下区域大规模机动车辆疏散的交通运行管理进行了研究。以元胞传输模型为理论基础,针对疏散交通流时空分布的高度随机、动态特性,建立了区域疏散系统最优动态交通分配模型。进一步重点分析了平面交叉口在疏散过程中的瓶颈问题,整合了交叉口流向冲突消除的交通管理策略,构建了基于交叉口冲突消除的疏散交通管理优化模型。最后以长春市中心区路网和2020年人口预测数据为依托进行实证分析,结果表明该模型能够为疏散交通管理者的决策提供有效支撑。     

论“反复自白”的效力

在刑事诉讼中,犯罪嫌疑人、被告人可能反复自白,形成多份甚至十数份口供,而一旦出现刑讯逼供等非法取供问题,则是否排除以及如何排除反复自白遂成为困扰实务界的难题。反复自白应当排除,并非基于"毒树之果"规则,而是因为非法证据排除规则具有延续效力。从我国现行司法体制和刑事诉讼机制出发,对反复自白应当坚持全部排除的观点,即只要刑讯逼供等非法取供行为一经查实,则犯罪嫌疑人所作的全部有罪供述均应无例外地一体排除。反复自白排除后,在对遭受刑讯逼供的被告人提供心理辅导的前提下,法官可以重新依法对被告人展开讯问,若被告人仍作出有罪供述,该口供可以作为定案根据。     

瑕疵证据之新解读

非法证据排除规则一直为我国社会所关注,其所蕴含的人权保障与程序正义理念已成为刑事诉讼的基本价值体现。两个证据规则的出台明确了非法证据排除规则在我国的正式确立,但与非法证据相伴而生的还有瑕疵证据,二者在证据的基本属性上有本质的差异,对其排除与适用规则也有不同规定:非法证据一律排除,瑕疵证据则可以有条件转化适用。     

论清末民初文学文本中“日化”语言的淘汰与扬弃

受清末民初繁盛的翻译态势的影响,汉语中引进了大量的"日化"外来语.这些外来语有些最终被现代汉语吸收,有些却遭到淘汰与扬弃.之所以会这样,一方面由汉语自身特点决定,一方面受中日政治、经济、文化交往或军事冲突的影响所致.     

西方经济政策、分配政策及扶贫政策观点上的分歧及其原因分析

过去的 2 0年里 ,西方经济学界在经济政策、财富分配和扶贫政策上存在着较大的分歧 ,而且有越演越烈的趋势。在分析这些分歧的基础上进一步探索分歧的本源 ,认为分歧的存在主要是由于两类思维方式 (“政府思维方式”与“民众思维方式”)在看待经济问题的角度和理解问题框架的不同造成的。最终 ,本文将冲突与分歧的本源归结为 :聚合尺度不同、时间尺度不同及对市场机制与能力理解的不同。只要充分认识到这些分歧的本源 ,本着求同存异的态度 ,持这两种不同观点的人是完全可能进行对话而非对抗的。