高师音乐教育中创新意识培养刍议

音乐是创造性最强的艺术,音乐教育是培养学生创新能力的一个重要渠道。进入二十一世纪音乐教育以其独有的特色,确立了它在我国教育领域中的重要地位。如何在音乐教育中培养学生的创新能力,是音乐教学永恒的主题。     

中国传统音乐美育思想及其现代转型

在中国传统文化中音乐美育思想十分丰富。早在两千多年以前就备受中国儒家的重视,他们视音乐为道德教化的理想手段,甚至认为音乐美育还有淳化社会风气、和谐社会的作用。但由于过多地强调音乐与政治的关系,也使音乐美育带有一定的缺陷。随着近代社会的转型,西方音乐美学思想也影响到我国音乐文化的变革,在实践的摸索中,中国近代的音乐美育思想有了较大的转向,中国的有识之士顺应时代的要求,引进了西方的美育思想,并将之与中国传统文化相结合,形成了新的特色。     

人间自是有情痴--读徐志摩的《我等候你》

徐志摩的情诗是他爱情生活的留痕,《我等候你》是他对陆小曼痴情的见证。这首诗不仅体现了徐志摩的爱情观、生活观,即追求爱、自由与美;也体现了他的艺术观,即诗歌的目的不是表现政治理想,而是抒发内心情感。这首诗按情感的自然流动分行,不讲究压韵和格式的整齐,具有浓厚的散文风格,同时兼具绘画美与音乐美,被认为是他最好的一首抒情诗之一。     

家庭档案及其教育功能探析

家庭档案在人们社会生活中的重要作用日益凸显;就教育功能而言,突出地表现在家庭档案可以提供德智体、美育、心育等方面的教育内容;同时,家庭档案也是一种积极有效的教育手段:能促进自主学习与自我教育,有利于家庭积极参与社区教育和社会主义精神文明建设;能促进学校的教育教学工作,有利于家教合作。档案部门、家庭、学校等有关方面应积极协作,加强宣传力度,加强公众的档案意识,向公众提供建设家庭档案的业务指导,加强家庭档案的建设,以充分发挥其教育功能。     

家族企业未来发展趋势的理论探析

家族企业由注重情感的家族和追求业绩的企业组成,它必定与其他企业存在差异.在对克林·盖尔西克等人相关理论研究的基础上,提出了新三环模式和新三极发展模式,并以此作为分析工具对家族企业发展演变过程进行全面、系统的理论探析,认为家族企业的未来发展必然走向泛家族化或社会化、公众化.     

Poverty and social trends in Russia

The article describes the socioeconomic situation of the Russian population and its dynamics in 1992. The analysis is based on series of regional sociological surveys led by the All-Russian Living Standards Research Center and on official Russian statistical data. The basic unit of analysis is the family, and hence family typology approbated both in research and in practical social work is introduced. Besides describing and discussing the growing poverty tendencies in contemporary Russia, the article also contains methodological recommendations for social policy bodies and social workers on the strategy of work in social maintenance and social support of the least secure population strata.     

Employment and filial relations: Is there a conflict?

Since children, particularly daughters, are among the most important sources of help and support for older Americans, it has been suggested that women's increasing employment will affect filial relations. Empirical evidence on this issue is inconsistent, in part due to the use of nonprobability samples. Few studies have measured effects for men. We attempt to broaden the scope of this question beyond help to the frail elderly by asking whether employment affects filial relations in general. We examine effects of hours employed on telephone contact, visiting, feelings of closeness, filial attitudes, and assistance to biological parents, for an area probability sample of men and women over 40. There are no effects of employment for men or women on contact, closeness, or assistance. For the vast majority of this population sample, contact and assistance involve few hours per week, and thus do not seem to conflict with employment.     

Work/Care Regimes: Institutions,Culture and Behaviour and the Australian Case

Increasingly around the industrialized world, labour markets rely upon the paid work of women, many of whom have dependents. Such changing patterns of paid work by women — and by men — are located within work/care regimes that are more or less hostile to the needs of paid workers who care for others. This article sets out a model of work/care regimes and locates the Australian case within international and historical contexts. In Australia, the unchanging normative male worker archetype dominates institutions of work and care, while the cultures of motherhood and fatherhood remain stoically resistant to renovation. In the meantime, the behaviour of working women runs ahead of these unchanging cultures and institutions, creating a policy interest in ‘reconciling’ work and care, but a failure to provide it. The reasons for this failure are outlined.     

Who Gets What From Government? Distributional Consequences of Child‐Care Assistance Policies

Given the fragmented structure of child‐care assistance in the United States, it has been difficult to obtain accurate estimates of which families are assisted, through which mechanisms, and at what level. Making use of survey data from New York City, we analyze the distribution of several forms of public child‐care assistance. Results suggest that about 40% of all families with young children receive some form of child‐care assistance. Considering all forms of assistance, the distribution of child‐care help is targeted in both expected and some unexpected ways. Implications of these results are discussed in the context of U.S. child‐care policies governing access and benefit levels.